Thanasai Jongkonnee, Laklaeng Sa-Ngob, Khemla Supphachoke, Ratanavong Khonesavanh, Chatatikun Moragot, Tangpong Jitbanjong, Klangbud Wiyada Kwanhian
Faculty of Medicine, Mahasarakham University, Mahasarakham 44000, Thailand.
School of Allied Health Sciences, Walailak University, Nakhon Si Thammarat 80160, Thailand.
Antibiotics (Basel). 2025 Jun 25;14(7):647. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics14070647.
: , the causative agent of melioidosis, is intrinsically resistant to multiple antibiotics, posing substantial challenges for treatment. Reports of acquired resistance are increasing, underscoring the need for global surveillance. : This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine the global prevalence of antibiotic-resistant isolated from human clinical cases, with a focus on regional differences and variations in antimicrobial susceptibility testing methods. We systematically searched PubMed, Scopus, and Embase for studies reporting resistance in clinical isolates, following PRISMA guidelines. Pooled resistance rates to 11 antibiotics were calculated using a random-effect model. Subgroup analyses were performed based on geographical region and testing methodology (MIC vs. disk diffusion). Twelve studies comprising 10,391 isolates were included. Resistance rates varied across antibiotics, with the highest pooled resistance observed for tigecycline (46.3%) and ciprofloxacin (38.3%). Ceftazidime (CAZ) and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (SXT), commonly used first-line agents, showed resistance rates of 5.3% and 4.2%, respectively. Subgroup analyses of CAZ and SXT revealed significantly higher resistance in studies from Asia compared to Australia and America ( value < 0.0001). Disk diffusion methods tended to overestimate resistance compared to MIC-based approaches, which revealed non-significant differences for CAZ ( value = 0.5343) but significant differences for SXT ( value < 0.0001). Antibiotic resistance in exhibits regional variation and is influenced by the susceptibility testing method used. Surveillance programs and standardized antimicrobial susceptibility testing protocols are essential to guide effective treatment strategies and ensure accurate resistance reporting.
类鼻疽杆菌是类鼻疽病的病原体,对多种抗生素具有内在抗性,给治疗带来了巨大挑战。获得性抗性的报告不断增加,凸显了全球监测的必要性。本系统评价和荟萃分析旨在确定从人类临床病例中分离出的抗生素抗性类鼻疽杆菌的全球流行率,重点关注区域差异和抗菌药敏试验方法的变化。我们按照PRISMA指南,系统检索了PubMed、Scopus和Embase,以查找报告临床类鼻疽杆菌分离株抗性的研究。使用随机效应模型计算了对11种抗生素的合并抗性率。根据地理区域和检测方法(最低抑菌浓度与纸片扩散法)进行亚组分析。纳入了12项研究,共10391株分离株。不同抗生素的抗性率各不相同,替加环素(46.3%)和环丙沙星(38.3%)的合并抗性率最高。常用的一线药物头孢他啶(CAZ)和复方磺胺甲恶唑(SXT)的抗性率分别为5.3%和4.2%。对CAZ和SXT的亚组分析显示,与澳大利亚和美洲的研究相比,亚洲研究中的抗性显著更高(P值<0.0001)。与基于最低抑菌浓度的方法相比,纸片扩散法往往高估抗性,基于最低抑菌浓度的方法显示CAZ无显著差异(P值=0.5343),但SXT有显著差异(P值<0.0001)。类鼻疽杆菌的抗生素抗性存在区域差异,并受所用药敏试验方法的影响。监测计划和标准化的抗菌药敏试验方案对于指导有效的治疗策略和确保准确的抗性报告至关重要。