Nishioka Noriko, Fujima Noriyuki, Tsuneta Satonori, Kato Daisuke, Kamiishi Takashi, Yoshikawa Masato, Kimura Rina, Sakamoto Keita, Matsumoto Ryuji, Abe Takashige, Kwon Jihun, Yoneyama Masami, Kudo Kohsuke
Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Hokkaido University Hospital, N14 W5, Kita-Ku, Sapporo 060-8648, Japan.
Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Faculty of Medicine and Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, N15 W7, Kita-ku, Sapporo 060-8638, Japan.
Eur J Radiol Open. 2025 Jul 22;15:100671. doi: 10.1016/j.ejro.2025.100671. eCollection 2025 Dec.
To evaluate and compare the image quality and lesion conspicuity of prostate T2-weighted imaging (T2WI) using four reconstruction methods: conventional Sensitivity Encoding (SENSE), compressed sensing (CS), model-based deep learning reconstruction (DL), and deep learning super-resolution reconstruction (SR).
This retrospective study included 49 patients who underwent multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) or biparametric MRI (bpMRI) for suspected prostate cancer. Axial T2WI was acquired using two protocols: conventional SENSE and CS-based acquisition. From the CS-based data, three reconstruction methods (CS, DL, and SR) were applied to generate additional images. Two board-certified radiologists independently assessed overall image quality and sharpness using a 4-point Likert scale (1 = poor, 4 = excellent). Quantitative analysis included signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and sharpness index. PI-RADS T2WI scoring and lesion conspicuity were preliminarily evaluated in 18 individuals with pathologically confirmed prostate cancer. Statistical comparisons were conducted using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test.
SR consistently achieved the highest scores in both qualitative (overall image quality, image sharpness) and quantitative (SNR, CNR, sharpness index) assessments, compared with SENSE, CS, and DL (all pairwise comparisons, Bonferroni-corrected p < 0.0001). In lesion-based analysis, SR showed a trend toward improved lesion conspicuity, although PI-RADS T2WI scores were similar across reconstruction.
SR reconstruction demonstrated superior image quality in both qualitative and quantitative assessments and showed potential benefits for lesion visualization. These findings, although based on a small sample, suggest that SR may be a promising approach for prostate MRI and warrants further investigation in larger populations.
使用四种重建方法评估并比较前列腺T2加权成像(T2WI)的图像质量和病变显示能力,这四种方法分别是:传统灵敏度编码(SENSE)、压缩感知(CS)、基于模型的深度学习重建(DL)和深度学习超分辨率重建(SR)。
这项回顾性研究纳入了49例因疑似前列腺癌而接受多参数MRI(mpMRI)或双参数MRI(bpMRI)检查的患者。使用两种方案采集轴位T2WI:传统SENSE和基于CS的采集。从基于CS的数据中,应用三种重建方法(CS、DL和SR)生成额外的图像。两名具有专业认证的放射科医生使用4分李克特量表(1=差,4=优)独立评估整体图像质量和清晰度。定量分析包括信噪比(SNR)、对比噪声比(CNR)和清晰度指数。对18例经病理证实为前列腺癌的患者进行PI-RADS T2WI评分和病变显示能力的初步评估。使用Wilcoxon符号秩检验进行统计学比较。
与SENSE、CS和DL相比,SR在定性(整体图像质量、图像清晰度)和定量(SNR、CNR、清晰度指数)评估中均始终获得最高分(所有成对比较,经Bonferroni校正的p<0.0001)。在基于病变的分析中,尽管不同重建方法的PI-RADS T2WI评分相似,但SR显示出病变显示能力改善的趋势。
SR重建在定性和定量评估中均显示出卓越的图像质量,并对病变可视化显示出潜在益处。这些发现虽然基于小样本,但表明SR可能是前列腺MRI的一种有前景的方法,值得在更大规模人群中进一步研究。