一项关于护士、助产士和专职医疗专业人员研究能力建设成功情况的范围综述方案。

Protocol for a scoping review investigating success in research capacity building for nurses, midwives and allied health professionals.

作者信息

Hamilton Colin, Malyon Alexandra, Pike Natalie, Wong Lok Yiu, Lock Kieran, Jones Emma, Deora Gabrielle, Martin Graham, McPeake Joanne

机构信息

Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom.

University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2025 Aug 1;20(8):e0329264. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0329264. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0329264

PMID:40748937

原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12316307/

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To identify and describe how success is currently conceptualised in research capacity building in nurses, midwives and allied health professionals in the UK.

INTRODUCTION

Having a research active healthcare workforce is associated with improved patient outcomes as well as staff retention. It is therefore seen as a key target for many healthcare organisations. Nurses, Midwives and Allied Health Professionals form the largest group of healthcare professionals but are traditionally less involved in research than medically trained staff. A variety of schemes have aimed to address this through so called "research capacity building" activities but an understanding of what constitutes success is needed to aid development of future interventions.

INCLUSION CRITERIA

Participants - Any or all of Nurses, Midwives or Allied Health Professionals. Concept- Definition of success or description of aims of activities aimed at research capacity building. Context- Within in the UK.

METHODS

Content from peer reviewed journals will be searched for in: Embase, CINAHL, MEDLINE, AMED, BNI and EMCARE Web of Science Core Collection. Grey Literature will be searched for in Google and Overton as well as key websites of organisations that work in developing research capacity. Website searches will include National Institute for Health and Care Research, all charities that form the Association of Medical Research Charities as of search date and the websites for the recognised professional bodies for Nurses, Midwives and Allied Health Professionals. Screening of titles and abstracts then full text will be undertaken by one person with 20% cross checked by a second reviewer. Data extraction will use a bespoke data extraction tool and will be undertaken by one person, with 20% cross checked with a second reviewer. A narrative synthesis and qualitative content analysis will be used to synthesise the data.

REGISTERED

OSF Registries: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/QVCDX.

摘要

目的

识别并描述目前英国护士、助产士和专职医疗人员研究能力建设中成功的概念是如何界定的。

引言

拥有积极开展研究的医疗保健工作队伍与改善患者治疗效果以及员工留任意愿相关。因此，这被视为许多医疗保健机构的关键目标。护士、助产士和专职医疗人员构成了最大的医疗保健专业人员群体，但传统上他们参与研究的程度低于接受医学培训的人员。各种计划旨在通过所谓的“研究能力建设”活动来解决这一问题，但需要了解成功的构成要素，以帮助制定未来的干预措施。

纳入标准

参与者——护士、助产士或专职医疗人员中的任何一方或全部。概念——成功的定义或旨在进行研究能力建设的活动目标描述。背景——在英国范围内。

方法

将在以下数据库中搜索同行评审期刊的内容：Embase、CINAHL、MEDLINE、AMED、BNI和EMCARE科学网核心合集。将在谷歌和Overton以及从事研究能力发展工作的组织的关键网站上搜索灰色文献。网站搜索将包括国家卫生与保健研究所、截至搜索日期构成医学研究慈善协会的所有慈善机构，以及护士、助产士和专职医疗人员认可专业机构的网站。由一人对标题和摘要进行筛选，然后对全文进行筛选，20%由第二名评审员进行交叉核对。数据提取将使用定制的数据提取工具，由一人进行，20%由第二名评审员进行交叉核对。将使用叙述性综合和定性内容分析来综合数据。