Pinedo Andres, Kruger Nate
Department of Human and Organizational Development, Vanderbilt University Peabody College, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
J Res Adolesc. 2025 Sep;35(3):e70058. doi: 10.1111/jora.70058.
Recognizing the significant roles of youth in social change efforts, research has increasingly aimed to clarify the processes that promote critical action among young people. Studies on sociopolitical development and critical consciousness emphasize that youth's reasoning about inequality and their sociopolitical efficacy are particularly salient precursors to critical action. However, this body of scholarship has yet to clarify the role of opportunity structures in sociopolitical development. Even less research investigates how the key factors in the sociopolitical development framework (e.g., critical reflection, sociopolitical efficacy, opportunity structures) differentially shape youth's critical action depending on their developmental phase. The current study analyzes the processes outlined in the theory of sociopolitical development using a diverse national sample of adolescents and young adults. Multigroup structural equation modeling of participants' survey data elucidated the prominent positive relationship between critical reflection and critical action, but revealed that sociopolitical efficacy was only positively linked to critical action in young adults. Additionally, the results indicated that opportunity structures played a more significant role in shaping the critical action of adolescents than that of young adults. In summary, the distinct relationships observed between adolescents and young adults highlight the necessity of considering key developmental differences in the sociopolitical development process to clarify pathways to political engagement.
认识到青年在社会变革努力中的重要作用后,研究越来越致力于阐明促进年轻人采取批判性行动的过程。关于社会政治发展和批判意识的研究强调,青年对不平等的推理及其社会政治效能是批判性行动特别突出的先兆。然而,这一学术领域尚未阐明机会结构在社会政治发展中的作用。更少的研究探讨社会政治发展框架中的关键因素(如批判性反思、社会政治效能、机会结构)如何根据青年的发展阶段不同地塑造他们的批判性行动。本研究使用来自不同国家的青少年和青年样本,分析了社会政治发展理论中概述的过程。对参与者调查数据的多组结构方程模型揭示了批判性反思与批判性行动之间显著的正相关关系,但表明社会政治效能仅与青年的批判性行动呈正相关。此外,结果表明,机会结构在塑造青少年的批判性行动方面比在塑造青年的批判性行动方面发挥了更重要的作用。总之,在青少年和青年之间观察到的不同关系凸显了在社会政治发展过程中考虑关键发展差异以阐明政治参与途径的必要性。