Suppr超能文献

髌股疼痛跑步者的跑步再训练技术与神经肌肉锻炼:一项范围综述

Running Retraining Technique and Neuromuscular Exercises in Runners with Patellofemoral Pain: A Scoping Review.

作者信息

Farraj Miguel, Guilhem Thomas, Van Cant Joachim, Rambaud Alexandre

机构信息

Faculty of Human Movement Sciences, Research Unit in Rehabilitation Sciences Université Libre de Bruxelles.

IFMK Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint-Étienne.

出版信息

Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2025 Aug 1;20(8):1107-1121. doi: 10.26603/001c.141861. eCollection 2025.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

When treating runners with patellofemoral pain (PFP), clinicians aim to reduce patients' symptoms, such as pain and discomfort. Running retraining techniques (RRT) and neuromuscular exercises (NME) are key interventions to achieve these goals.

PURPOSE

This scoping review examined the use of RRT and NME, either combined or standalone, in runners with PFP.

STUDY DESIGN

Scoping review.

METHODS

Databases searched included MEDLINE, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar. Two researchers independently identified eligible studies and extracted data. The scoping review followed the PRISMA-SCR framework, using population, concept, and context criteria. The population included recreational to professional runners over 18 years with PFP, excluding those involved in any sport other than running., as well as those with prior knee surgeries, the history or presence of other knee pathologies, or pediatric populations. The review focused on studies utilizing NME or RRT for PFP treatment, adhering to ACSM guidelines and excluding studies only providing study protocols. Exercise reporting was assessed using the Consensus on Exercise Reporting Template. NME protocols were analyzed using the FITT framework (Frequency, Intensity, Time, Type). RRT protocols were evaluated by session frequency, start timing, clinician input, cadence, feedback, footwear use, speed changes, self-rehabilitation, and progression.

RESULTS

Fifteen studies were reviewed. The timing and complementarity of RRT with NME were often absent or poorly defined. NME mainly focused on single-leg squats in seven protocols, with forward lunges, step-downs, and trunk-rotating squats in three studies each. These exercises emphasized trunk inclination and gluteal activation, with variations in feedback, sets, reps, and progression. RRT treatment ranged from a single 10-minute retraining session to 12 weekly sessions. Cadence increase was addressed in six studies, dynamic valgus in four, with most feedback being auditory/visual. Minimalist shoes were used in two studies, and three standardized running speed.

CONCLUSION

A notable variability exists in interventions for PFP in runners, especially in the timing and complementarity of RRT and NME. A standardized reporting system is needed to better analyze study protocol implementation.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

N/A.

摘要

背景

在治疗患有髌股疼痛(PFP)的跑步者时,临床医生旨在减轻患者的症状,如疼痛和不适。跑步再训练技术(RRT)和神经肌肉锻炼(NME)是实现这些目标的关键干预措施。

目的

本范围综述研究了RRT和NME单独或联合用于患有PFP的跑步者的情况。

研究设计

范围综述。

方法

检索的数据库包括MEDLINE、ScienceDirect和谷歌学术。两名研究人员独立确定符合条件的研究并提取数据。该范围综述遵循PRISMA-SCR框架,使用人群、概念和背景标准。人群包括18岁以上患有PFP的业余到专业跑步者,不包括从事跑步以外任何运动的人,以及有过膝关节手术史、其他膝关节病变史或存在其他膝关节病变的人,或儿童人群。该综述重点关注利用NME或RRT治疗PFP的研究,遵循美国运动医学学会指南,排除仅提供研究方案的研究。使用运动报告模板共识评估运动报告。使用FITT框架(频率、强度、时间、类型)分析NME方案。通过训练频率、开始时间、临床医生指导、步频、反馈、鞋类使用、速度变化、自我康复和进展情况评估RRT方案。

结果

共审查了15项研究。RRT与NME的时间安排和互补性往往缺乏或定义不明确。在七个方案中,NME主要侧重于单腿深蹲,在三项研究中分别侧重于前弓步、下台阶和躯干旋转深蹲。这些练习强调躯干倾斜和臀肌激活,在反馈、组数、重复次数和进展方面存在差异。RRT治疗从单次10分钟的再训练课程到每周12次课程不等。六项研究涉及步频增加,四项研究涉及动态外翻,大多数反馈为听觉/视觉。两项研究使用了极简主义跑鞋,三项研究采用了标准化跑步速度。

结论

跑步者PFP的干预措施存在显著差异,尤其是在RRT和NME的时间安排和互补性方面。需要一个标准化的报告系统来更好地分析研究方案的实施情况。

证据水平

无。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b0df/12317788/ecf939bcddcb/ijspt_2025_20_8_141861_292716.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验