• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

韩国全国队列研究:高血压患者诊室血压范围与心血管事件

Office Blood Pressure Range and Cardiovascular Events in Patients With Hypertension: A Nationwide Cohort Study in South Korea.

机构信息

Division of Cardiology Department of Internal Medicine Konkuk University Medical Center Konkuk University School of Medicine Seoul Republic of Korea.

Division of Cardiology Department of Internal Medicine Hanyang University College of Medicine Seoul Republic of Korea.

出版信息

J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 Apr 6;10(7):e017890. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.017890. Epub 2021 Mar 19.

DOI:10.1161/JAHA.120.017890
PMID:33739126
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8174356/
Abstract

Background It is unclear what office blood pressure (BP) is the optimal treatment target range in patients with hypertension. Methods and Results Using the Korean National Health Insurance Service database, we extracted the data on 479 359 patients with hypertension with available BP measurements and no history of cardiovascular events from 2002 to 2011. The study end point was major cardiovascular events (MACE), a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke. This cohort study evaluated the association of BP levels (<120/<70, 120-129/70-79, 130-139/80-89, 140-149/90-99, and ≥150/≥100 mm Hg) with MACE. During a median follow-up of 9 years, 55 401 MACE were documented in our cohort. The risk of MACE was the lowest (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.79; 95% CI, 0.76-0.84) at BP level of <120/<70 mm Hg, and was the highest (HR, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.29-1.36) at ≥150/≥100 mm Hg in comparison with 130 to 139/80 to 89 mm Hg. These results were consistent in all age groups and both sexes. Among patients treated with antihypertensive medication (n=237 592, 49.5%), in comparison with a BP level of 130 to 139/80 to 89 mm Hg, the risk of MACE was significantly higher in patients with elevated BP (≥140/≥90 mm Hg), but not significantly lower in patients with BP of <130/<80 mm Hg. Low BP <120/70 mm Hg was associated with increased risk of all-cause or cardiovascular death in all age groups. Conclusions BP level is significantly correlated with the risk of MACE in all Korean patients with hypertension. However, there were no additional benefits for MACE amongst those treated for hypertension with BP <120/70 mm Hg.

摘要

背景

目前尚不清楚高血压患者的最佳治疗目标血压范围是多少。

方法和结果

利用韩国国家健康保险服务数据库,我们提取了 2002 年至 2011 年间 479359 例有血压测量值且无心血管事件史的高血压患者的数据。研究终点为主要心血管事件(MACE),即心血管死亡、心肌梗死或中风的综合指标。本队列研究评估了血压水平(<120/<70、120-129/70-79、130-139/80-89、140-149/90-99 和≥150/≥100mmHg)与 MACE 的关系。在中位随访 9 年期间,我们的队列中记录了 55401 例 MACE。BP 水平<120/<70mmHg 时,MACE 风险最低(校正后的危险比[HR],0.79;95%置信区间[CI],0.76-0.84),而≥150/≥100mmHg 时,MACE 风险最高(HR,1.32;95%CI,1.29-1.36),与 130-139/80-89mmHg 相比。这些结果在所有年龄组和性别中均一致。在接受降压药物治疗的患者中(n=237592,占 49.5%),与 130-139/80-89mmHg 的 BP 相比,BP 升高(≥140/≥90mmHg)的患者发生 MACE 的风险显著更高,但 BP<130/<80mmHg 的患者发生 MACE 的风险并无显著降低。所有年龄组的 BP<120/70mmHg 均与全因或心血管死亡风险增加相关。

结论

BP 水平与所有韩国高血压患者的 MACE 风险显著相关。然而,对于接受 BP<120/70mmHg 治疗的高血压患者,MACE 并无额外获益。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/21d0/8174356/b90899a4dcb6/JAH3-10-e017890-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/21d0/8174356/ca536ea12f7c/JAH3-10-e017890-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/21d0/8174356/e1ed6facfc0a/JAH3-10-e017890-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/21d0/8174356/b9bb61aecbbb/JAH3-10-e017890-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/21d0/8174356/b90899a4dcb6/JAH3-10-e017890-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/21d0/8174356/ca536ea12f7c/JAH3-10-e017890-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/21d0/8174356/e1ed6facfc0a/JAH3-10-e017890-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/21d0/8174356/b9bb61aecbbb/JAH3-10-e017890-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/21d0/8174356/b90899a4dcb6/JAH3-10-e017890-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Office Blood Pressure Range and Cardiovascular Events in Patients With Hypertension: A Nationwide Cohort Study in South Korea.韩国全国队列研究:高血压患者诊室血压范围与心血管事件
J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 Apr 6;10(7):e017890. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.017890. Epub 2021 Mar 19.
2
Optimal office blood pressure levels in younger (<50 years old) Korean hypertensive patients: a nationwide cohort study in South Korea.韩国年轻(<50 岁)高血压患者最佳诊室血压水平:一项全国性队列研究。
J Hypertens. 2022 Dec 1;40(12):2449-2458. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000003277. Epub 2022 Aug 18.
3
Disparities in Mortality and Cardiovascular Events by Income and Blood Pressure Levels Among Patients With Hypertension in South Korea.韩国高血压患者的收入和血压水平与死亡率和心血管事件的差异。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 Apr 6;10(7):e018446. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.018446. Epub 2021 Mar 15.
4
Evaluation of Optimal Diastolic Blood Pressure Range Among Adults With Treated Systolic Blood Pressure Less Than 130 mm Hg.收缩压治疗后低于130mmHg的成年人最佳舒张压范围的评估
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Feb 1;4(2):e2037554. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.37554.
5
Thiazide Use and Cardiovascular Events in Type 2 Diabetic Patients With Well-Controlled Blood Pressure.噻嗪类利尿剂的使用与血压控制良好的 2 型糖尿病患者的心血管事件。
Hypertension. 2019 Dec;74(6):1541-1550. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.119.13886. Epub 2019 Nov 4.
6
Cardiovascular Risk of Isolated Systolic or Diastolic Hypertension in Young Adults.年轻人单纯收缩期或舒张期高血压的心血管风险。
Circulation. 2020 Jun 2;141(22):1778-1786. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.044838. Epub 2020 Jun 1.
7
Blood pressure levels and cardiovascular risk according to age in patients with diabetes mellitus: a nationwide population-based cohort study.糖尿病患者血压水平及心血管风险与年龄的关系:一项基于全国人群的队列研究。
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2020 Oct 19;19(1):181. doi: 10.1186/s12933-020-01156-8.
8
Systolic blood pressure levels among adults with hypertension and incident cardiovascular events: the atherosclerosis risk in communities study.患有高血压和新发心血管事件的成年人的收缩压水平:社区动脉粥样硬化风险研究
JAMA Intern Med. 2014 Aug;174(8):1252-61. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.2482.
9
Age and sex specific target of blood pressure for the prevention of cardiovascular event among the treatment naive hypertensive patients.降压治疗的高血压患者心血管事件预防的血压年龄和性别特定目标。
Sci Rep. 2020 Dec 9;10(1):21538. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-78641-3.
10
Association of Optimal Blood Pressure With Critical Cardiorenal Events and Mortality in High-Risk and Low-Risk Patients Treated With Antihypertension Medications.优化的血压与接受抗高血压药物治疗的高危和低危患者的关键心肾事件及死亡率的关系。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Aug 2;2(8):e199307. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.9307.

引用本文的文献

1
Mortality and Readmission Outcomes for Intensive and Conventional Cardiac Rehabilitation (MR-OFICR) Study.强化与传统心脏康复的死亡率和再入院结局(MR-OFICR)研究
J Community Hosp Intern Med Perspect. 2025 Jul 3;15(4):8-13. doi: 10.55729/2000-9666.1514. eCollection 2025.
2
Real-World Impact of Blood Pressure Control in Patients With Apparent Treatment-Resistant or Difficult-to-Control Hypertension and Stages 3 and 4 Chronic Kidney Disease.伴有明显治疗抵抗或难以控制的高血压及 3 或 4 期慢性肾脏病患者的血压控制的真实世界影响。
Am J Hypertens. 2024 May 15;37(6):438-446. doi: 10.1093/ajh/hpae020.
3
Association of uncontrolled blood pressure in apparent treatment-resistant hypertension with increased risk of major adverse cardiovascular events plus.

本文引用的文献

1
Relationship of the Blood Pressure Categories, as Defined by the ACC/AHA 2017 Blood Pressure Guidelines, and the Risk of  Development of Cardiovascular Disease in Low-Risk Young  Adults: Insights From a Retrospective Cohort of Young Adults.美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会 2017 年血压指南定义的血压类别与低危年轻成年人发生心血管疾病风险的关系:来自年轻成年人回顾性队列的研究结果。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2019 Jun 4;8(11):e011946. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.011946. Epub 2019 May 29.
2
Age-specific associations between systolic blood pressure and cardiovascular mortality.收缩压与心血管死亡率的年龄特异性关联。
Heart. 2019 Jul;105(14):1070-1077. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2019-314697. Epub 2019 May 4.
3
与明显治疗抵抗性高血压中未控制的血压相关联的主要不良心血管事件风险增加。
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2023 Aug;25(8):737-747. doi: 10.1111/jch.14701. Epub 2023 Jul 17.
4
Participation and Prognostic Impact of Cardiac Rehabilitation After Acute Coronary Syndrome: Big-Data Study of the Korean National Health Insurance Service.急性冠状动脉综合征后心脏康复的参与和预后影响:韩国国家健康保险服务的大数据研究。
J Korean Med Sci. 2023 Apr 17;38(15):e119. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2023.38.e119.
5
Combined Citrulline and Glutathione Supplementation Improves Endothelial Function and Blood Pressure Reactivity in Postmenopausal Women.联合补充瓜氨酸和谷胱甘肽可改善绝经后妇女的内皮功能和血压反应性。
Nutrients. 2023 Mar 23;15(7):1557. doi: 10.3390/nu15071557.
Optimal Target Blood Pressure and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease in Low-Risk Younger Hypertensive Patients.
低危年轻高血压患者的最佳目标血压与心血管疾病风险。
Am J Hypertens. 2019 Aug 14;32(9):833-841. doi: 10.1093/ajh/hpz067.
4
Reconsidering the cut-off diastolic blood pressure for predicting cardiovascular events: a nationwide population-based study from Korea.重新考虑预测心血管事件的舒张压截止值:来自韩国的一项全国性基于人群的研究。
Eur Heart J. 2019 Mar 1;40(9):724-731. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy801.
5
Association of Blood Pressure Classification in Korean Young Adults According to the 2017 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Guidelines With Subsequent Cardiovascular Disease Events.根据 2017 年美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会指南对韩国年轻成年人进行的血压分类与随后心血管疾病事件的关系。
JAMA. 2018 Nov 6;320(17):1783-1792. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.16501.
6
2017 ACC/AHA/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/AGS/APhA/ASH/ASPC/NMA/PCNA Guideline for the Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Management of High Blood Pressure in Adults: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines.2017美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会/美国医师助理学会/美国心脏病学学会/美国预防医学学院/美国老年医学会/美国药剂师协会/美国血液学会/美国预防医学学会/美国医学协会/美国初级保健医师学会成人高血压预防、检测、评估和管理指南:美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会临床实践指南工作组报告
Circulation. 2018 Oct 23;138(17):e484-e594. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000596.
7
2018 ESC/ESH Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension.2018年欧洲心脏病学会/欧洲高血压学会动脉高血压管理指南。
Eur Heart J. 2018 Sep 1;39(33):3021-3104. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy339.
8
Influence of Baseline Diastolic Blood Pressure on Effects of Intensive Compared With Standard Blood Pressure Control.基础舒张压对强化与标准血压控制效果影响的研究。
Circulation. 2018 Jan 9;137(2):134-143. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.030848. Epub 2017 Oct 11.
9
Cohort profile: the National Health Insurance Service-National Health Screening Cohort (NHIS-HEALS) in Korea.队列简介:韩国国家健康保险服务-国家健康筛查队列(NHIS-HEALS)。
BMJ Open. 2017 Sep 24;7(9):e016640. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016640.
10
Global, regional, and national comparative risk assessment of 84 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or clusters of risks, 1990-2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016.全球、区域和国家 84 种行为、环境和职业以及代谢风险或风险组合的比较风险评估,1990-2016 年:全球疾病负担研究 2016 年的系统分析。
Lancet. 2017 Sep 16;390(10100):1345-1422. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32366-8.