Kokkinidis L, Anisman H
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1977 Apr 29;52(2):123-8. doi: 10.1007/BF00439098.
Mice received either intraperitoneal (1.0, 3.0, 5.0, or 15.0 mg/kg) or unilateral intraventricular injection (50.0, 100.0 or 200.0 microgram) of d-amphetamine. Both routes of injection produced circling behavior in a dose-related fashion when animals were tested in a circular alley-way. In contrast, performance in a free running Y-maze alternation task was differentially affected by the route of administration. Whereas intraperitoneal injection induced perseveration (i.e., animals consecutively visited only two arms of the maze), intraventricular injection augmented alternation behavior normally seen in saline-treated mice. It was suggested that Y-maze performance following intraventricular d-amphetamine injection reflects response perseveration, whereas systemic d-amphetamine treatment produced stimulus perseveration (repetition of location rather than direction). Moreover d-amphetamine-induced circling produced by intraperitoneal administration probably is an artifact of drug-induced stimulus perseveration as opposed to motor biases observed following intraventricular injections.
给小鼠腹腔注射(1.0、3.0、5.0或15.0毫克/千克)或单侧脑室内注射(50.0、100.0或200.0微克)d-苯丙胺。当在圆形通道中对动物进行测试时,两种注射途径均以剂量相关的方式产生转圈行为。相比之下,在自由运行的Y迷宫交替任务中的表现受到给药途径的不同影响。腹腔注射会导致固执行为(即动物仅连续访问迷宫的两个臂),而脑室内注射则增强了盐水处理小鼠中通常可见的交替行为。有人认为,脑室内注射d-苯丙胺后的Y迷宫表现反映了反应固执,而全身性d-苯丙胺治疗则产生了刺激固执(位置重复而非方向重复)。此外,腹腔给药引起的d-苯丙胺诱导的转圈可能是药物诱导的刺激固执的假象,而不是脑室内注射后观察到的运动偏差。