Chen Weiyi, Qian Hui, Zhang Limao, Pan Yue, Li Zongao, Gardoni Paolo
School of Civil Engineering, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.
School of Civil Engineering, Henan Polytechnic University, Jiaozuo, China.
Commun Eng. 2025 Aug 7;4(1):145. doi: 10.1038/s44172-025-00481-8.
Floods severely disrupt prehospital emergency medical services (EMS), which dispatch medical personnel to deliver on-scene treatment, by hindering ambulance mobility and increasing medical demand. Here, we proposes a simulation-based framework that integrates flood inundation, EMS facility data, and population-weighted medical demand to assess regional EMS performance under different flood scenarios. Applied to Zhengzhou, China, the framework evaluates system responses during normal conditions, 1-in-50-year, 1-in-100-year floods, and the extreme "7.20" rainfall disaster. Results show dramatic increases in response times during "7.20", with resource shortages identified as a key delay factor. Three mitigation strategies are evaluated: adding ambulances, inter-subcenter ambulance sharing, and a hybrid approach. The results demonstrate that ambulance sharing outperforms limited ambulance additions, increasing 10-min and 30-min population coverage by 15.2% and 22.7%, respectively, while the hybrid approach achieves optimal improvement. The findings offer policy guidance for improving EMS resilience in flood-prone regions and support global urban disaster preparedness.
洪水严重扰乱了院前紧急医疗服务(EMS),这种服务通过派遣医务人员进行现场治疗,而洪水阻碍了救护车的机动性并增加了医疗需求。在此,我们提出了一个基于模拟的框架,该框架整合了洪水淹没情况、EMS设施数据和人口加权医疗需求,以评估不同洪水场景下的区域EMS绩效。应用于中国郑州,该框架评估了正常情况、50年一遇、100年一遇洪水以及极端“7·20”降雨灾害期间的系统响应。结果显示,“7·20”期间响应时间大幅增加,资源短缺被确定为关键延迟因素。评估了三种缓解策略:增加救护车、分中心间救护车共享以及混合方法。结果表明,救护车共享优于有限地增加救护车,分别将10分钟和30分钟的人口覆盖率提高了15.2%和22.7%,而混合方法实现了最佳改善。这些发现为提高洪水易发地区的EMS复原力提供了政策指导,并支持全球城市备灾工作。