Dörr Tamara, Lacy Joanne, Ballouz Tala, Cusini Alexia, Grässli Fabian, Haile Sarah, Kocan Emina, Möller J Carsten, Puhan Milo A, Schlegel Matthias, von Kietzell Matthias, Rütti Markus, Stocker Reto, Vuichard Gysin Danielle, Kahlert Christian R, Kuster Stefan P, Kohler Philipp
HOCH, Cantonal Hospital St.Gallen, Division of Infectious Diseases, Infection Prevention and Travel Medicine, St.Gallen, Switzerland.
Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention Institute (EBPI), University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Commun Med (Lond). 2025 Aug 9;5(1):347. doi: 10.1038/s43856-025-01046-8.
BACKGROUND: In the post-pandemic phase, the value of annual SARS-CoV-2 booster vaccination in healthcare-workers is unclear. In this multicentre cohort study, we sought to determine the association of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination status and other risk factors with the occurrence of influenza-like respiratory illness and workdays lost due to influenza-like respiratory illness. METHODS: During a period of high SARS-CoV-2 community transmission (November 2023 to May 2024), we collected weekly data on symptoms and sick day leave and used negative binomial regression to identify risk factors for these outcomes among 1745 healthcare workers. To single out the effect of the vaccine and account for potential confounding, additional inverse probability weighted analysis was performed. RESULTS: In both analyses, we show that more SARS-CoV-2 vaccinations are associated with a higher risk of influenza-like respiratory illness and workdays lost. For influenza-like respiratory illness, the association is stronger with a more recent timing of the vaccination rather than the number of vaccinations, which suggests that the effect wanes over time. In contrast, seasonal influenza vaccination is associated with a decreased risk for both outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Based on our data, we conclude that SARS-CoV-2 booster vaccination does not contribute to the protection of the healthcare workforce in a post-pandemic setting. SARS-CoV-2 vaccination may even temporarily increase the likelihood of symptomatic infection and workday loss.
背景:在疫情后阶段,医护人员每年接种新冠病毒加强针的价值尚不清楚。在这项多中心队列研究中,我们试图确定新冠病毒疫苗接种状况及其他风险因素与流感样呼吸道疾病的发生以及因流感样呼吸道疾病导致的工作日损失之间的关联。 方法:在新冠病毒社区传播高发期(2023年11月至2024年5月),我们每周收集症状和病假数据,并使用负二项回归分析来确定1745名医护人员中这些结果的风险因素。为了单独分离出疫苗的效果并考虑潜在的混杂因素,我们进行了额外的逆概率加权分析。 结果:在两项分析中,我们均表明,接种更多剂次新冠病毒疫苗与患流感样呼吸道疾病及工作日损失的较高风险相关。对于流感样呼吸道疾病,这种关联在疫苗接种时间更近时更强,而非接种剂次数,这表明这种效果会随时间减弱。相比之下,季节性流感疫苗接种与这两种结果的风险降低相关。 结论:基于我们的数据,我们得出结论,在疫情后环境中,新冠病毒加强针接种无助于保护医护人员。新冠病毒疫苗接种甚至可能暂时增加出现症状性感染和工作日损失的可能性。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023-1-30
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022-1-17
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025-2-27
Health Technol Assess. 2024-7
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022-5-20
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024-12-16
Eur J Clin Invest. 2024-3
Clin Immunol. 2023-10
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2023-10