• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在北欧国家奥密克戎为主导期间,不同异源第三剂疫苗接种方案对严重 COVID-19 的效果比较:基于人群的队列分析。

Comparative effectiveness of heterologous third dose vaccine schedules against severe covid-19 during omicron predominance in Nordic countries: population based cohort analyses.

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology Research, Statens Serum Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark

Department of Epidemiology Research, Statens Serum Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

BMJ. 2023 Jul 24;382:e074325. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2022-074325.

DOI:10.1136/bmj-2022-074325
PMID:37487623
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10360027/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the comparative vaccine effectiveness of heterologous booster schedules (ie, three vaccine doses) compared with primary schedules (two vaccine doses) and with homologous mRNA vaccine booster schedules (three vaccine doses) during a period of omicron predominance.

DESIGN

Population based cohort analyses.

SETTING

Denmark, Finland, Norway, and Sweden, 27 December 2020 to 31 December 2022.

PARTICIPANTS

All adults aged ≥18 years who had received at least a primary vaccination schedule of AZD1222 (Oxford-AstraZeneca) or monovalent SARS-CoV-2 wild type (ancestral) strain based mRNA vaccines BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) or mRNA-1273 (Moderna), in any combination.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The main outcome measure was country combined risks of covid-19 related hospital admission and death with covid-19 and additional outcomes of covid-19 related admission to an intensive care unit and SARS-CoV-2 infection. During a period of omicron predominance, these outcomes were compared in those who received a heterologous booster versus primary schedule (matched analyses) and versus those who received a homologous mRNA vaccine booster (weighted analyses). Follow-up was for 75 days from day 14 after the booster dose; comparative vaccine effectiveness was calculated as 1-risk ratio.

RESULTS

Across the four Nordic countries, 1 086 418 participants had received a heterologous booster schedule of AZD1222+BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273 and 2 505 093 had received a heterologous booster schedule of BNT162b2+mRNA-1273. Compared with the primary schedule only (two doses), the vaccine effectiveness of heterologous booster schedules comprising AZD1222+BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273 and BNT162b2+mRNA-1273 was 82.7% (95% confidence interval 77.1% to 88.2%) and 81.5% (78.9% to 84.2%) for covid-19 related hospital admission and 95.9% (91.6% to 100.0%) and 87.5% (82.5% to 92.6%) for death with covid-19, respectively. Homologous mRNA booster schedules were similarly associated with increased protection against covid-19 related hospital admission (≥76.5%) and death with covid-19 (≥84.1%) compared with previous primary course vaccination only. When a heterologous booster schedule was compared with the homologous booster schedule, vaccine effectiveness was 27.2% (3.7% to 50.6%) for AZD1222+BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273 and 23.3% (15.8% to 30.8%) for BNT162b2+mRNA-1273 schedules against covid-19 related hospital admission and 21.7% (-8.3% to 51.7%) and 18.4% (-15.7% to 52.5%) against death with covid-19, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Heterologous booster schedules are associated with increased protection against severe, omicron related covid-19 outcomes compared with primary course schedules and homologous booster schedules.

摘要

目的

在奥密克戎为主的时期,研究异源加强接种方案(即三剂疫苗)与初级接种方案(两剂疫苗)以及同源 mRNA 疫苗加强接种方案(三剂疫苗)相比的疫苗相对有效性。

设计

基于人群的队列分析。

设置

丹麦、芬兰、挪威和瑞典,2020 年 12 月 27 日至 2022 年 12 月 31 日。

参与者

所有至少接受过 AZD1222(牛津-阿斯利康)或单价 SARS-CoV-2 野生型(祖先)株基于 mRNA 疫苗 BNT162b2(辉瑞-生物技术)或 mRNA-1273(Moderna)的初级接种方案的≥18 岁成年人,无论组合如何。

主要观察指标

主要观察指标是与 COVID-19 相关的住院和死亡的国家合并风险,以及 COVID-19 相关的 ICU 住院和 SARS-CoV-2 感染的其他结果。在奥密克戎为主的时期,比较了接受异源加强接种与初级接种方案(匹配分析)和同源 mRNA 疫苗加强接种方案(加权分析)的患者的这些结果。随访时间为加强接种后第 14 天开始的 75 天;比较疫苗有效性为 1-风险比。

结果

在四个北欧国家中,有 1086418 名参与者接受了 AZD1222+BNT162b2 或 mRNA-1273 的异源加强接种方案,2505093 名参与者接受了 BNT162b2+mRNA-1273 的异源加强接种方案。与仅接受初级接种方案(两剂)相比,AZD1222+BNT162b2 或 mRNA-1273 和 BNT162b2+mRNA-1273 组成的异源加强接种方案的疫苗有效性分别为 82.7%(95%置信区间 77.1%至 88.2%)和 81.5%(78.9%至 84.2%),COVID-19 相关住院的风险和 95.9%(91.6%至 100.0%)和 87.5%(82.5%至 92.6%),与 COVID-19 相关的死亡。同源 mRNA 加强接种方案与 COVID-19 相关住院(≥76.5%)和 COVID-19 相关死亡(≥84.1%)的保护作用相似,与之前的初级疗程接种相比。当比较异源加强接种方案与同源加强接种方案时,AZD1222+BNT162b2 或 mRNA-1273 方案的疫苗有效性为 27.2%(3.7%至 50.6%),BNT162b2+mRNA-1273 方案为 23.3%(15.8%至 30.8%),用于 COVID-19 相关住院,分别为 21.7%(-8.3%至 51.7%)和 18.4%(-15.7%至 52.5%)。

结论

与初级疗程方案和同源加强接种方案相比,异源加强接种方案与严重的、与奥密克戎相关的 COVID-19 结果的保护作用增加。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a156/10360027/501bba153ccc/andn074325.f6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a156/10360027/37a50464b24d/andn074325.f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a156/10360027/f2982acc865b/andn074325.f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a156/10360027/52bcad3c99ca/andn074325.f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a156/10360027/7d58c614eef6/andn074325.f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a156/10360027/1b5200654989/andn074325.f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a156/10360027/501bba153ccc/andn074325.f6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a156/10360027/37a50464b24d/andn074325.f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a156/10360027/f2982acc865b/andn074325.f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a156/10360027/52bcad3c99ca/andn074325.f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a156/10360027/7d58c614eef6/andn074325.f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a156/10360027/1b5200654989/andn074325.f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a156/10360027/501bba153ccc/andn074325.f6.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparative effectiveness of heterologous third dose vaccine schedules against severe covid-19 during omicron predominance in Nordic countries: population based cohort analyses.在北欧国家奥密克戎为主导期间,不同异源第三剂疫苗接种方案对严重 COVID-19 的效果比较:基于人群的队列分析。
BMJ. 2023 Jul 24;382:e074325. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2022-074325.
2
Effectiveness of homologous and heterologous booster doses for an inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine: a large-scale prospective cohort study.同源和异源加强针对于灭活 SARS-CoV-2 疫苗的有效性:一项大规模前瞻性队列研究。
Lancet Glob Health. 2022 Jun;10(6):e798-e806. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(22)00112-7. Epub 2022 Apr 23.
3
Safety of heterologous primary and booster schedules with ChAdOx1-S and BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273 vaccines: nationwide cohort study.ChAdOx1-S 和 BNT162b2 或 mRNA-1273 疫苗异源初免和加强接种的安全性:全国队列研究。
BMJ. 2022 Jul 13;378:e070483. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2022-070483.
4
Immunogenicity and reactogenicity against the SARS-CoV-2 variants following heterologous primary series involving CoronaVac, ChAdox1 nCov-19 and BNT162b2 plus BNT162b2 booster vaccination: An open-label randomized study in healthy Thai adults.接种科兴新冠疫苗、腺病毒载体新冠疫苗和辉瑞疫苗加强针后对 SARS-CoV-2 变异株的免疫原性和反应原性:一项在泰国健康成年人中开展的开放标签随机研究。
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2022 Nov 30;18(6):2091865. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2022.2091865. Epub 2022 Jul 11.
5
Heterologous versus homologous COVID-19 booster vaccination in previous recipients of two doses of CoronaVac COVID-19 vaccine in Brazil (RHH-001): a phase 4, non-inferiority, single blind, randomised study.巴西两剂科兴新冠疫苗(CoronaVac)既往接种者中异源与同源加强接种 COVID-19 疫苗(RHH-001):一项四期、非劣效性、单盲、随机研究。
Lancet. 2022 Feb 5;399(10324):521-529. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)00094-0. Epub 2022 Jan 21.
6
COVID-19 vaccine waning and effectiveness and side-effects of boosters: a prospective community study from the ZOE COVID Study.COVID-19 疫苗效力下降和加强针的有效性和副作用:来自 ZOE COVID 研究的一项前瞻性社区研究。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2022 Jul;22(7):1002-1010. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(22)00146-3. Epub 2022 Apr 8.
7
Comparative effectiveness of BNT162b2 versus mRNA-1273 covid-19 vaccine boosting in England: matched cohort study in OpenSAFELY-TPP.BNT162b2 与 mRNA-1273 新冠病毒疫苗加强针在英格兰的疗效比较:OpenSAFELY-TPP 的匹配队列研究。
BMJ. 2023 Mar 15;380:e072808. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2022-072808.
8
Effect of priming interval on reactogenicity, peak immunological response, and waning after homologous and heterologous COVID-19 vaccine schedules: exploratory analyses of Com-COV, a randomised control trial.预充间隔对同源和异源 COVID-19 疫苗接种方案的反应原性、免疫反应峰值和消退的影响:Com-COV 的探索性分析,一项随机对照试验。
Lancet Respir Med. 2022 Nov;10(11):1049-1060. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(22)00163-1. Epub 2022 Jun 9.
9
Covid-19 Vaccine Effectiveness against the Omicron (B.1.1.529) Variant.Covid-19 疫苗对奥密克戎(B.1.1.529)变异株的有效性。
N Engl J Med. 2022 Apr 21;386(16):1532-1546. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2119451. Epub 2022 Mar 2.
10
Effect of mRNA Vaccine Boosters against SARS-CoV-2 Omicron Infection in Qatar.mRNA 疫苗加强剂对卡塔尔奥密克戎感染的保护效果。
N Engl J Med. 2022 May 12;386(19):1804-1816. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2200797. Epub 2022 Mar 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Association of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination status with risk of influenza-like illness and loss of workdays in healthcare workers.严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2型(SARS-CoV-2)疫苗接种状况与医护人员流感样疾病风险及工作日损失的关联。
Commun Med (Lond). 2025 Aug 9;5(1):347. doi: 10.1038/s43856-025-01046-8.
2
Viral sepsis-induced mortality of older patients infected by the Omicron subvariant BA.5 of SARS-CoV-2: a retrospective study.新型冠状病毒Omicron变异株BA.5感染导致老年患者的病毒败血症死亡率:一项回顾性研究。
BMC Infect Dis. 2025 Apr 22;25(1):577. doi: 10.1186/s12879-025-10894-7.
3
Comparative effectiveness of monovalent XBB.1.5 containing covid-19 mRNA vaccines in Denmark, Finland, and Sweden: target trial emulation based on registry data.

本文引用的文献

1
A third vaccine dose equalises the levels of effectiveness and immunogenicity of heterologous or homologous COVID-19 vaccine regimens, Lyon, France, December 2021 to March 2022.法国里昂,2021 年 12 月至 2022 年 3 月,第三剂疫苗使异源或同源 COVID-19 疫苗方案的有效性和免疫原性达到平衡。
Euro Surveill. 2023 Apr;28(15). doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2023.28.15.2200746.
2
Comparative effectiveness of BNT162b2 versus mRNA-1273 covid-19 vaccine boosting in England: matched cohort study in OpenSAFELY-TPP.BNT162b2 与 mRNA-1273 新冠病毒疫苗加强针在英格兰的疗效比较:OpenSAFELY-TPP 的匹配队列研究。
BMJ. 2023 Mar 15;380:e072808. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2022-072808.
3
丹麦、芬兰和瑞典含单价XBB.1.5的新冠mRNA疫苗的比较有效性:基于登记数据的目标试验模拟
BMJ Med. 2024 Nov 17;3(1):e001074. doi: 10.1136/bmjmed-2024-001074. eCollection 2024.
4
A dose escalation study to evaluate the safety of an aerosol BCG infection in previously BCG-vaccinated healthy human UK adults.一项评估先前接种过卡介苗的健康英国成年人气溶胶卡介苗感染安全性的剂量递增研究。
Front Immunol. 2024 Nov 14;15:1427371. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1427371. eCollection 2024.
5
Pulmonary embolism after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination.新型冠状病毒2型疫苗接种后的肺栓塞
Vaccine X. 2024 Oct 15;21:100571. doi: 10.1016/j.jvacx.2024.100571. eCollection 2024 Dec.
6
A Response to: A Letter to the Editor Regarding 'Comparative Effectiveness of mRNA-1273 and BNT162b2 COVID-19 Vaccines Among Older Adults: Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis Using the GRADE Framework'.对一篇致编辑的信的回应:关于“mRNA-1273和BNT162b2新冠疫苗在老年人中的比较效果:使用GRADE框架的系统文献综述和荟萃分析”
Infect Dis Ther. 2024 Oct;13(10):2195-2202. doi: 10.1007/s40121-024-01020-2. Epub 2024 Aug 24.
7
A Letter to the Editor Regarding 'Comparative Effectiveness of mRNA-1273 and BNT162b2 COVID-19 Vaccines Among Older Adults: Systematic Literature Review and Meta-analysis Using the GRADE Framework'.致编辑的一封信,关于“mRNA-1273和BNT162b2新冠疫苗在老年人中的比较效果:使用GRADE框架的系统文献综述和荟萃分析”
Infect Dis Ther. 2024 Oct;13(10):2203-2206. doi: 10.1007/s40121-024-01019-9. Epub 2024 Aug 24.
8
Comparison of long-term anti-RBD SARS-CoV-2 antibody response following different vaccination schemes in Tunisia.突尼斯不同疫苗接种方案后长期抗 RBD SARS-CoV-2 抗体应答的比较。
Tunis Med. 2024 Aug 5;102(8):457-464. doi: 10.62438/tunismed.v102i8.4944.
9
Vaccine Effectiveness against GP-Attended Symptomatic COVID-19 and Hybrid Immunity among Adults in Hungary during the 2022-2023 Respiratory Season Dominated by Different SARS-CoV-2 Omicron Subvariants.2022 - 2023年呼吸道疾病季节期间,在以不同的严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)奥密克戎亚变体为主导的匈牙利,疫苗对成人出现症状的新冠病毒感染(COVID-19)的有效性及混合免疫情况
Vaccines (Basel). 2024 May 4;12(5):496. doi: 10.3390/vaccines12050496.
10
Interchangeability of different COVID-19 vaccine platforms as booster doses: A phase 3 study mimicking real-world practice.不同 COVID-19 疫苗平台作为加强针的可互换性:一项模拟真实世界实践的 3 期研究。
Vaccine. 2024 Jul 25;42(19):3989-3998. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.05.009. Epub 2024 May 17.
Effectiveness of ChAdOx1-S COVID-19 booster vaccination against the Omicron and Delta variants in England.
在英格兰,ChAdOx1-S COVID-19 加强疫苗接种对奥密克戎和德尔塔变异株的有效性。
Nat Commun. 2022 Dec 12;13(1):7688. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-35168-7.
4
High vaccine effectiveness against severe COVID-19 in the elderly in Finland before and after the emergence of Omicron.在奥密克戎出现前后,芬兰老年人对严重 COVID-19 的疫苗有效性很高。
BMC Infect Dis. 2022 Nov 5;22(1):816. doi: 10.1186/s12879-022-07814-4.
5
Effectiveness of mRNA COVID-19 Vaccine Boosters Against Infection, Hospitalization, and Death: A Target Trial Emulation in the Omicron (B.1.1.529) Variant Era.mRNA COVID-19 疫苗加强针对感染、住院和死亡的有效性:奥密克戎(B.1.1.529)变异株时代的目标试验模拟。
Ann Intern Med. 2022 Dec;175(12):1693-1706. doi: 10.7326/M22-1856. Epub 2022 Oct 11.
6
Effectiveness of an inactivated Covid-19 vaccine with homologous and heterologous boosters against Omicron in Brazil.巴西使用同源和异源加强针的灭活新冠疫苗对奥密克戎的有效性。
Nat Commun. 2022 Oct 6;13(1):5536. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-33169-0.
7
Waning of vaccine effectiveness against moderate and severe covid-19 among adults in the US from the VISION network: test negative, case-control study.美国 VISION 网络中成年人针对中度和重度 COVID-19 的疫苗有效性下降:阴性检测、病例对照研究。
BMJ. 2022 Oct 3;379:e072141. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2022-072141.
8
Estimated Effectiveness of COVID-19 Vaccines Against Omicron or Delta Symptomatic Infection and Severe Outcomes.奥密克戎或德尔塔变异株感染及重症的 COVID-19 疫苗有效性评估。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Sep 1;5(9):e2232760. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.32760.
9
Comparative Effectiveness of BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 Booster Dose After BNT162b2 Primary Vaccination Against the Omicron Variants: A Retrospective Cohort Study Using Large-Scale Population-Based Registries in Japan.BNT162b2 和 mRNA-1273 加强针在 BNT162b2 基础免疫后对奥密克戎变异株的有效性比较:一项使用日本大规模基于人群的登记处的回顾性队列研究。
Clin Infect Dis. 2023 Jan 6;76(1):18-24. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciac763.
10
Comparison of the Effectiveness and Safety of Heterologous Booster Doses with Homologous Booster Doses for SARS-CoV-2 Vaccines: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.异源加强免疫与同源加强免疫对 SARS-CoV-2 疫苗有效性和安全性的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 29;19(17):10752. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191710752.