Logan John R, Minca Elisabeta, Bellman Benjamin, Kisch Amory, Carlson H Jacob
Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
Kean University, NJ, US.
City Community. 2024 Jun;23(2):155-179. doi: 10.1177/15356841231188968. Epub 2023 Aug 2.
A standard interpretation of the intensification of segregation in the early twentieth century is that residents of Northern cities reacted against a growing African American presence, using segregation as a tool of social control that was less needed in the South. Evidence from newly available data for 134 cities in 1900-1940 puts this interpretation in question in several ways. We find that segregation was already high in 1900 at the neighborhood scale. Not only was it rising, but it was changing its spatial scale as clusters of Black settlement in side streets and alleys disappeared from White districts while expanding into large Black zones. Finally, multivariate analyses show that trends were similar in the North and South, and in neither region was Black population size (i.e., "Black threat") a significant predictor of increasing segregation. The general trends of rising segregation and increasing spatial scale became a nationwide pattern.
对20世纪初种族隔离加剧的一种标准解释是,北方城市的居民对非裔美国人数量的不断增加做出反应,将种族隔离作为一种社会控制手段,而这种手段在南方并不那么必要。1900年至1940年期间134个城市的新数据证据从几个方面对这种解释提出了质疑。我们发现,在1900年,邻里层面的种族隔离程度就已经很高了。它不仅在上升,而且其空间尺度也在变化,因为白人社区中位于小巷和胡同的黑人聚居区消失了,同时扩展成了大型黑人区。最后,多变量分析表明,南北地区的趋势相似,而且在这两个地区,黑人人口规模(即“黑人威胁”)都不是种族隔离加剧的重要预测因素。种族隔离加剧和空间尺度扩大的总体趋势成为了一种全国性模式。