• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

超越普查区:多地理尺度下种族隔离的模式与决定因素

Beyond the Census Tract: Patterns and Determinants of Racial Segregation at Multiple Geographic Scales.

作者信息

Lee Barrett A, Reardon Sean F, Firebaugh Glenn, Farrell Chad R, Matthews Stephen A, O'Sullivan David

机构信息

Pennsylvania State University.

Stanford University.

出版信息

Am Sociol Rev. 2008 Oct;73(5):766-791. doi: 10.1177/000312240807300504.

DOI:10.1177/000312240807300504
PMID:25324575
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4196718/
Abstract

The census tract-based residential segregation literature rests on problematic assumptions about geographic scale and proximity. We pursue a new tract-free approach that combines explicitly spatial concepts and methods to examine racial segregation across egocentric local environments of varying size. Using 2000 census data for the 100 largest U.S. metropolitan areas, we compute a spatially modified version of the information theory index to describe patterns of black-white, Hispanic-white, Asian-white, and multi-group segregation at different scales. The metropolitan structural characteristics that best distinguish micro-segregation from macro-segregation for each group combination are identified, and their effects are decomposed into portions due to racial variation occurring over short and long distances. A comparison of our results to those from tract-based analyses confirms the value of the new approach.

摘要

基于普查区的居住隔离文献基于关于地理尺度和邻近性的有问题的假设。我们采用一种新的无普查区方法,该方法结合明确的空间概念和方法,以研究不同规模的以自我为中心的当地环境中的种族隔离。利用美国100个最大都市区的2000年人口普查数据,我们计算了信息理论指数的空间修正版本,以描述不同尺度下黑-白、西班牙裔-白、亚裔-白和多群体隔离模式。确定了每组组合中最能区分微观隔离和宏观隔离的大都市结构特征,并将其影响分解为短距离和长距离种族差异所导致的部分。将我们的结果与基于普查区分析的结果进行比较,证实了新方法的价值。

相似文献

1
Beyond the Census Tract: Patterns and Determinants of Racial Segregation at Multiple Geographic Scales.超越普查区:多地理尺度下种族隔离的模式与决定因素
Am Sociol Rev. 2008 Oct;73(5):766-791. doi: 10.1177/000312240807300504.
2
Race and space in the 1990s: changes in the geographic scale of racial residential segregation, 1990-2000.20世纪90年代的种族与空间:1990 - 2000年种族居住隔离地理范围的变化
Soc Sci Res. 2009 Mar;38(1):55-70. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2008.10.002.
3
The geographic scale of metropolitan racial segregation.大都市种族隔离的地理范围。
Demography. 2008 Aug;45(3):489-514. doi: 10.1353/dem.0.0019.
4
Racial and Ethnic Residential Segregation and Household Structure: A Research Note.种族与族裔居住隔离及家庭结构:一篇研究笔记
Soc Sci Res. 2010 Jan;39(1):39-47. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2009.06.006.
5
Linking Dichotomous Segregation with Multi-group Segregation: Weighted Segregation Ratios in Selected U. S. Metropolitan Areas.将二分法隔离与多群体隔离联系起来:美国部分大都市地区的加权隔离率
Soc Sci Res. 2011 Jan;40(1):379-391. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2010.05.005.
6
White Residential Segregation in U.S. Metropolitan Areas: Conceptual Issues, Patterns, and Trends from the US Census, 1980 to 2010.美国大都市区的白人居住隔离:概念问题、模式以及1980年至2010年美国人口普查的趋势
Popul Res Policy Rev. 2013 Oct 1;32(5). doi: 10.1007/s11113-013-9277-6.
7
Race/Ethnicity and Geographic Access to Urban Trauma Care.种族/民族和地理上获得城市创伤护理。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Mar 1;2(3):e190138. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.0138.
8
From Census Tracts to Local Environments: An Egocentric Approach to Neighborhood Racial Change.从人口普查区到当地环境:一种以自我为中心的邻里种族变化研究方法。
Spat Demogr. 2019 Apr;7(1):1-26. doi: 10.1007/s40980-018-0044-5. Epub 2018 Jun 18.
9
Racial Segregation and Inequality in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit for Very Low-Birth-Weight and Very Preterm Infants.极低出生体重和极早产儿新生儿重症监护病房中的种族隔离和不平等。
JAMA Pediatr. 2019 May 1;173(5):455-461. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2019.0241.
10
The residential segregation of the American Indian and Alaska Native population in US metropolitan and micropolitan areas, 2010.2010年美国都市和微型都市地区美国印第安人和阿拉斯加原住民的居住隔离情况。
Demogr Res. 2019 Jan-Jun;40:963-974. doi: 10.4054/DemRes.2019.40.33. Epub 2019 Apr 16.

引用本文的文献

1
From Side Street to Ghetto: Understanding the Rising Levels and Changing Spatial Pattern of Segregation, 1900-1940.从偏僻街道到贫民区:理解1900年至1940年间种族隔离程度的上升及空间模式的变化
City Community. 2024 Jun;23(2):155-179. doi: 10.1177/15356841231188968. Epub 2023 Aug 2.
2
Assessing Obesity Risk: The Interaction of the Built and Food Environments with African Americans in Chicago.评估肥胖风险:芝加哥建成环境与食物环境对非裔美国人的影响
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2025 Jun 24. doi: 10.1007/s40615-025-02463-0.
3
A State-Level Examination into Structural Racism and Racialized Disparities in Sexually Transmitted Infections.

本文引用的文献

1
Using Geographic Information Systems to Reconceptualize Spatial Relationships and Ecological Context.利用地理信息系统重新概念化空间关系和生态环境。
AJS. 2006 Sep;112(2):567-612. doi: 10.1086/506418?origin=JSTOR-pdf.
2
The geographic scale of metropolitan racial segregation.大都市种族隔离的地理范围。
Demography. 2008 Aug;45(3):489-514. doi: 10.1353/dem.0.0019.
3
Immigrant residential segregation in U.S. metropolitan areas, 1990-2000.1990 - 2000年美国大都市地区的移民居住隔离情况。
一项关于性传播感染中结构性种族主义和种族化差异的州级调查。
Spat Demogr. 2025;13(1):4. doi: 10.1007/s40980-025-00136-4. Epub 2025 Feb 10.
4
A bivariate multifractal analysis approach to understanding socio-spatial segregation dynamics.一种用于理解社会空间隔离动态的双变量多重分形分析方法。
Sci Rep. 2025 Feb 7;15(1):4610. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-86024-9.
5
Quantification and visualization of US racial geography using the National Racial Geography Dataset 2020.利用 2020 年国家种族地理数据集量化和可视化美国种族地理。
PLoS One. 2024 Jul 25;19(7):e0307745. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0307745. eCollection 2024.
6
Longitudinal Associations Between Friendship Ethnic/Racial Composition and Ethnic/Racial Identity: The Role of School Ethnic/Racial Diversity.友谊的种族/民族构成与种族/民族认同的纵向关联:学校种族/民族多样性的作用。
J Youth Adolesc. 2024 Nov;53(11):2534-2550. doi: 10.1007/s10964-024-02041-3. Epub 2024 Jun 28.
7
Urban segregation on multilayered transport networks: a random walk approach.多层交通网络上的城市隔离:一种随机游走方法。
Sci Rep. 2024 Apr 10;14(1):8370. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-58932-9.
8
Association between racial residential segregation and walkability in 745 U.S. cities.美国 745 个城市中种族居住隔离与可步行性之间的关联。
Health Place. 2023 Nov;84:103114. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2023.103114. Epub 2023 Sep 27.
9
Location-specific strategies for eliminating US national racial-ethnic [Formula: see text] exposure inequality.消除美国国家种族-民族[公式:见正文]暴露不平等的特定地点策略。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Nov;119(44):e2205548119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2205548119. Epub 2022 Oct 24.
10
Identifying a spatial scale for the analysis of residential burglary: An empirical framework based on point pattern analysis.确定住宅入室盗窃分析的空间尺度:基于点模式分析的实证框架。
PLoS One. 2022 Feb 28;17(2):e0264718. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0264718. eCollection 2022.
Demography. 2008 Feb;45(1):79-94. doi: 10.1353/dem.2008.0009.
4
Neighborhood racial composition, neighborhood poverty, and the spatial accessibility of supermarkets in metropolitan Detroit.底特律都会区的邻里种族构成、邻里贫困状况以及超市的空间可达性。
Am J Public Health. 2005 Apr;95(4):660-7. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2004.042150.
5
Distinguishing the geographic levels and social dimensions of U.S. metropolitan segregation, 1960-2000.区分1960年至2000年美国大都市隔离的地理层次和社会维度。
Demography. 2004 Feb;41(1):37-59. doi: 10.1353/dem.2004.0002.
6
Hypersegregation in the twenty-first century.21世纪的高度隔离。
Demography. 2004 Feb;41(1):23-36. doi: 10.1353/dem.2004.0009.
7
Segregation of minorities in the metropolis: two decades of change.大都市中少数族裔的隔离:二十年的变迁
Demography. 2004 Feb;41(1):1-22. doi: 10.1353/dem.2004.0007.
8
Future directions in residential segregation and health research: a multilevel approach.居住隔离与健康研究的未来方向:一种多层次方法
Am J Public Health. 2003 Feb;93(2):215-21. doi: 10.2105/ajph.93.2.215.
9
Smooth pycnophylactic interpolation for geographical regions.地理区域的平滑密集插值法。
J Am Stat Assoc. 1979;74(367):519-30. doi: 10.1080/01621459.1979.10481647.
10
Latino, Asian, and black segregation in U.S. metropolitan areas: are multiethnic metros different?美国大都市区的拉丁裔、亚裔和黑人隔离情况:多民族大都市有何不同?
Demography. 1996 Feb;33(1):35-50.