Cantamessa Astrid, Blouin Stéphane, Rummler Maximilian, Berzlanovich Andrea, Weinkamer Richard, Hartmann Markus A, Ruffoni Davide
Mechanics of Biological and Bioinspired Materials Laboratory, Department of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering, University of Liège, 4000 Liège, Belgium.
Trauma Centre Meidling, 1st Medical Department Hanusch Hospital, Ludwig Boltzmann Institute of Osteology at Hanusch Hospital of OEGK and AUVA, 1120 Vienna, Austria.
JBMR Plus. 2025 Jul 8;9(9):ziaf114. doi: 10.1093/jbmrpl/ziaf114. eCollection 2025 Sep.
The cement line (CL) is a thin layer, 1-3 μm in width, separating secondary osteons from interstitial bone and other osteons. Despite the possible role for bone quality, the CL is still one of the least understood features of bone. This study aims to investigate how the mineral content of the CL varies not only with osteon age but also with the surrounding environment. Using quantitative backscattered electron imaging to measure the mineral content, we analyzed 35 osteons from femoral bone of 2 male individuals (40 and 81 yr old). We implemented a new approach to investigate the mineral content based on a spatially resolved analysis in layers along the CL and incorporating regions both inside the osteon (formed soon after CL deposition) and outside (already present at the time of CL deposition). We found that the CLs had always higher mineral content than the corresponding osteon ( < .001) and that not only the osteon, but also the CL increases its mineral content with time. Including areas outside the osteon in the analysis improved considerable our understanding of CL mineralization. After a rapid primary phase, where the CL incorporates more mineral than the osteon, secondary mineralization is about 60% lower in the CL than in the osteon. One key finding is that the mineralization of the CL is not universal but depends on the region in which the osteon is formed. This is supported by a strong correlation between the mineral content of the CL and outside the osteon ( = 0.75, < .001), but not inside. One possible explanation is that mineral released during bone resorption may contribute to the mineralization of the CL, as higher mineral content in resorbed bone was associated with greater mineralization in the CL.
黏合线(CL)是一层薄薄的结构,宽度为1 - 3微米,将次级骨单位与骨间质和其他骨单位分隔开来。尽管黏合线可能对骨质量有作用,但其仍是骨骼中最不为人所了解的特征之一。本研究旨在探究黏合线的矿物质含量不仅如何随骨单位年龄变化,还如何随周围环境变化。我们使用定量背散射电子成像来测量矿物质含量,分析了2名男性个体(40岁和81岁)股骨中的35个骨单位。我们实施了一种新方法来研究矿物质含量,该方法基于沿黏合线分层的空间分辨分析,并纳入骨单位内部(黏合线沉积后不久形成)和外部(黏合线沉积时已存在)的区域。我们发现,黏合线的矿物质含量始终高于相应的骨单位(<0.001),而且不仅骨单位,黏合线的矿物质含量也随时间增加。在分析中纳入骨单位外部区域极大地增进了我们对黏合线矿化的理解。在快速的初级阶段,黏合线比骨单位吸收更多矿物质,之后黏合线的次级矿化比骨单位低约60%。一个关键发现是,黏合线的矿化并非普遍现象,而是取决于骨单位形成的区域。这一点得到黏合线与骨单位外部矿物质含量之间强相关性(=0.75,<0.001)的支持,但骨单位内部则不然。一种可能的解释是,骨吸收过程中释放的矿物质可能有助于黏合线的矿化,因为吸收骨中较高的矿物质含量与黏合线中更大程度的矿化相关。