Suppr超能文献

丹麦成年人用植物性替代品替代乳制品的驱动因素和障碍的混合方法评估

A Mixed-Method Assessment of Drivers and Barriers for Substituting Dairy with Plant-Based Alternatives by Danish Adults.

作者信息

Philippi Rosane Beatriz, Tjørring Lise, Ley Annika, Byrne Derek Victor, Andersen Barbara Vad, Bügel Susanne Gjedsted, Wennerscheid Sophie

机构信息

Department of Nutrition, Exercise and Sports, University of Copenhagen, Rolighedsvej 26, 1980 Frederiksberg, Denmark.

Sino-Danish College (SDC), University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 380 Huaibeizhuang, Huairou District, Beijing 101408, China.

出版信息

Foods. 2025 Aug 7;14(15):2755. doi: 10.3390/foods14152755.

Abstract

The market for plant-based alternatives to animal foods has increased rapidly in the past decade, mainly due to consumer demand. Little evidence is available regarding nutritional impacts, drivers, and barriers to using these products as substitutes for animal foods in real-life conditions. This pilot study followed 16 Danish adults (30 ± 11 years old; 11 females) for 4 weeks with substituting milk, cheese, and yogurt with plant-based analogues to dairy (PBADs) and assessed their drivers and barriers to applying the intervention with a mixed-method approach. PBADs are constantly compared to their animal counterparts, both regarding product characteristics, such as price and sensory properties, as well as cultural roles and subjective memories. The mixed methods showed dairy attachment, price, and taste were the main barriers to consuming PBAD, while changes in life and social circles were drivers (qualitative data). As for the liking of PBADs, plant-based yoghurt was the preferred intervention product (73.5/100, < 0.05), followed by plant-based drinks (65.9/100), while plant-based cheese was the lowest rated (47.9/100, < 0.05). As for dietary changes, a lower average intake of sugars, saturated fatty acids, cholesterol, calcium, phosphorus, and zinc was observed after the intervention. Additionally, this study describes the attachment of the study population to milk and dairy products. It shows that choosing dairy is beyond nourishment but is connected to tradition, culture, pleasure, memories, and a sense of belonging. In contrast, there is no history or attachment to PBADs.

摘要

在过去十年中,植物性动物食品替代品市场迅速增长,这主要归因于消费者需求。关于在现实生活中将这些产品用作动物食品替代品的营养影响、驱动因素和障碍,目前几乎没有相关证据。这项试点研究对16名丹麦成年人(年龄30±11岁;11名女性)进行了为期4周的跟踪,用植物性乳制品替代品(PBADs)替代牛奶、奶酪和酸奶,并采用混合方法评估他们应用该干预措施的驱动因素和障碍。PBADs在产品特性(如价格和感官特性)以及文化角色和主观记忆方面,都经常与动物性同类产品进行比较。混合方法显示,对乳制品的依恋、价格和口味是食用PBADs的主要障碍,而生活和社交圈子的变化则是驱动因素(定性数据)。至于对PBADs的喜好,植物性酸奶是首选的干预产品(73.5/100,<0.05),其次是植物性饮料(65.9/100),而植物性奶酪的评分最低(47.9/100,<0.05)。在饮食变化方面,干预后观察到糖、饱和脂肪酸、胆固醇、钙、磷和锌的平均摄入量有所降低。此外,本研究描述了研究人群对牛奶和乳制品的依恋情况。研究表明,选择乳制品不仅仅是为了营养,还与传统、文化、愉悦感、记忆和归属感有关。相比之下,PBADs没有相关历史或情感依恋。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b8cd/12346285/c06568e051f1/foods-14-02755-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验