Pg AkhilAnand, Ann Abraham Elen, Verma Ghanshyam, Prakash Keerthana, Mounika Pedada
Department of Respiratory Medicine, Sree Balaji Medical College and Hospital, Chennai, IND.
Cureus. 2025 Jul 13;17(7):e87811. doi: 10.7759/cureus.87811. eCollection 2025 Jul.
Background Pleural effusion affects approximately 320 individuals per 100,000 population and can result from a wide range of pulmonary and extrapulmonary conditions. It may present as a complication of an existing illness or as an initial clinical sign, making accurate diagnosis and timely management essential. Under normal physiological conditions, the pleural space contains 7-16 mL of fluid (approximately 0.26 ± 0.1 mL/kg in healthy non-smokers). Effusion develops when fluid production exceeds clearance. Based on pathophysiology, pleural effusions are classified as either transudates or exudates. Light's criteria remain the standard diagnostic tool but may misclassify up to 25% of cases. Recent studies suggest that pleural fluid cholesterol (pCHOL) may offer superior diagnostic accuracy. Aim This study aims to evaluate the reliability and diagnostic accuracy of pCHOL and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) in distinguishing between transudative and exudative effusions in a tertiary care setting. Methods In this cross-sectional study, 80 patients with pleural effusion were classified as transudative (n = 30) or exudative (n = 50) based on clinical and radiological criteria. Paired pleural fluid and serum samples were collected. Pleural fluid protein, LDH, and cholesterol levels, as well as serum protein and LDH, were analyzed to apply Light's criteria. Diagnostic performance was evaluated using sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values. Statistical analysis was conducted using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 21.0 (Released 2012; IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, US), with p < 0.05 considered statistically significant. Results Mean pCHOL was significantly higher in exudative effusions (68.5 ± 20.3 mg/dL) than in transudative effusions (25.2 ± 9.6 mg/dL, p < 0.001). At a cutoff value of 45 mg/dL, pCHOL showed a sensitivity of 98% and specificity of 100%. This outperformed the pleural/serum protein ratio (78%/82%), pleural/serum LDH ratio (86%/93%), and pleural LDH level (88%/90%). The statistically significant difference in pCHOL levels underscores its superior diagnostic utility (p < 0.001). Conclusion pCHOL is a highly sensitive and specific biomarker for identifying exudative pleural effusions and demonstrates better diagnostic performance than Light's criteria. Its simplicity, cost-effectiveness, and diagnostic reliability support its routine inclusion in pleural fluid analysis.
胸腔积液在每10万人中约影响320人,可由多种肺部和肺外疾病引起。它可能表现为现有疾病的并发症或初始临床症状,因此准确诊断和及时处理至关重要。在正常生理条件下,胸膜腔含有7 - 16毫升液体(健康非吸烟者约为0.26±0.1毫升/千克)。当液体产生超过清除时就会形成积液。根据病理生理学,胸腔积液分为漏出液或渗出液。莱特标准仍然是标准诊断工具,但可能会将高达25%的病例误诊。最近的研究表明,胸水胆固醇(pCHOL)可能具有更高的诊断准确性。目的:本研究旨在评估在三级医疗环境中,pCHOL和乳酸脱氢酶(LDH)在区分漏出性和渗出性胸腔积液方面的可靠性和诊断准确性。方法:在这项横断面研究中,80例胸腔积液患者根据临床和放射学标准分为漏出性(n = 30)或渗出性(n = 50)。收集配对的胸水和血清样本。分析胸水蛋白、LDH和胆固醇水平以及血清蛋白和LDH,以应用莱特标准。使用敏感性、特异性和预测值评估诊断性能。使用IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows,版本21.0(2012年发布;IBM公司,美国纽约州阿蒙克)进行统计分析,p < 0.05被认为具有统计学意义。结果:渗出性胸腔积液的平均pCHOL(68.5±20.3毫克/分升)显著高于漏出性胸腔积液(25.2±9.6毫克/分升,p < 0.001)。在临界值为45毫克/分升时,pCHOL的敏感性为98%,特异性为100%。这优于胸水/血清蛋白比值(78%/82%)、胸水/血清LDH比值(86%/93%)和胸水LDH水平(88%/90%)。pCHOL水平的统计学显著差异突出了其优越的诊断效用(p < 0.001)。结论:pCHOL是识别渗出性胸腔积液的高度敏感和特异的生物标志物,并且比莱特标准具有更好的诊断性能。其简单性、成本效益和诊断可靠性支持将其常规纳入胸水分析。