Li Yinglin, Zhao Ling, Lin Doudou, Wang Xinmei, Zhang Chunlong, Zhou Jiali, Cai Zhongxiang
Department of Nursing, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Department of Geriatrics, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Front Psychiatry. 2025 Jul 30;16:1596015. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1596015. eCollection 2025.
Anxiety and depression are common mental disorders in the elderly. Concurrent frailty may lead to worse clinical outcomes. This study examined the network structures of anxiety and depression in frail and non-frail older adults.
The Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale-10 (CESD-10) and the Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale-7 (GAD-7) were used to measure depressive and anxiety symptoms, respectively. Following propensity score matching (PSM), 877 frail elderly individuals were matched with 877 non-frail elderly individuals. Central (influential) and bridge symptoms were estimated using the expected influence (EI) and bridge expected influence (bridge EI), respectively. Network stability was assessed using the case-dropping bootstrap method.
Based on the NCT results, there were no significant differences in the comparison of the network models between the non-frailty group and the frailty group in terms of global strength (7.175 vs. 7.136, S = 0.039, P = 0.802) and network structure (M = 0.137, P = 0.703). There were also no significant differences in edge weights between the networks of the two groups (P > 0.05).
NCT results showed no significant difference in the network structure of anxiety and depression between frail elderly and control groups. A slight decrease in network strength was observed in non-frail elderly but was not statistically significant. Both groups showed similar characteristics in bridging symptoms, central symptoms, overall strength, and network structure. Interventions for anxiety and depression are equally beneficial for both frail and non-frail elderly.
焦虑和抑郁是老年人常见的精神障碍。同时存在的虚弱可能导致更差的临床结果。本研究探讨了虚弱和非虚弱老年人焦虑和抑郁的网络结构。
分别使用流行病学研究中心抑郁量表10项版(CESD-10)和广泛性焦虑障碍量表7项版(GAD-7)来测量抑郁和焦虑症状。经过倾向得分匹配(PSM)后,877名虚弱老年人与877名非虚弱老年人进行了匹配。分别使用预期影响力(EI)和桥梁预期影响力(桥梁EI)来估计中心(有影响力)症状和桥梁症状。使用病例剔除自助法评估网络稳定性。
基于网络比较测试(NCT)结果,在全局强度(7.175对7.136,S = 0.039,P = 0.802)和网络结构(M = 0.137,P = 0.703)方面,非虚弱组和虚弱组的网络模型比较无显著差异。两组网络之间的边权重也无显著差异(P > 0.05)。
NCT结果显示,虚弱老年人与对照组在焦虑和抑郁的网络结构上无显著差异。非虚弱老年人的网络强度略有下降,但无统计学意义。两组在桥梁症状、中心症状、整体强度和网络结构方面表现出相似的特征。针对焦虑和抑郁的干预措施对虚弱和非虚弱老年人同样有益。