• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利多卡因浸润拭子用于新冠病毒采样的研究

Research on sampling of COVID-19 with lidocaine-soaked swab.

作者信息

Gong Chen, Lan Xiaoyan

机构信息

Respiratory Medicine Department, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, People's Republic of China.

Experiment Center, Faculty of Chinese Medicine Science Guangxi University of Chinese Medicine, Nanning, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 Aug 15;104(33):e43918. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000043918.

DOI:10.1097/MD.0000000000043918
PMID:40826795
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12366947/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study explores the comfort level of lidocaine-soaked swab for nucleic acid detection of COVID-19 (Coronavirus Disease 2019) patients. Oropharyngeal and nasopharyngeal secretions from COVID-19 patients were collected using lidocaine-soaked swabs.

METHODS

COVID-19 patients were randomly divided into experimental group and control group, with 25 patients in each group. The first oropharyngeal and nasopharyngeal swabs (experimental group) was be soaked in lidocaine hydrochloride injection. The control group was tested for novel coronavirus nucleic acid by routine nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swabs. Then, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) ribonucleic acid (RNA) was detected in 2 groups by real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Participants' discomfort was assessed by a visual analog scale. Then, the discomfort and cycle threshold (Ct) values after sampling were compared between the 2 groups.

RESULTS

A total of 50 patients were enrolled in the study. There were no lidocaine-related complications during sampling. COVID-19 inpatients feel more comfortable with the use of lidocaine-soaked swabs (nasopharyngeal 3.44 ± 1.42 vs 5.68 ± 0.95, P < .01; oropharyngeal 4.4 ± 1.53 vs 8.92 ± 0.91, P < .01). Ct values of nasopharyngeal swab specimens were generally lower than those of oropharyngeal swab specimens. There was no statistically significant difference between Ct value results of the 2 groups. The use of lidocaine-soaked swabs for sampling of COVID-19 reduces patients' discomfort. This method is worth popularizing in novel coronavirus sampling.

CONCLUSION

The use of lidocaine-soaked swabs for sampling of COVID-19 reduces patients' discomfort, which it has no obvious effect on Ct value. This method is worth popularizing in novel coronavirus sampling.

摘要

背景

本研究探讨利多卡因浸润拭子用于新型冠状病毒肺炎(COVID-19)患者核酸检测时的舒适度。使用利多卡因浸润拭子采集COVID-19患者的口咽和鼻咽分泌物。

方法

将COVID-19患者随机分为实验组和对照组,每组25例。第一口咽和鼻咽拭子(实验组)浸泡于盐酸利多卡因注射液中。对照组采用常规鼻咽/口咽拭子检测新型冠状病毒核酸。然后,通过实时逆转录-聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)检测两组中的严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)核糖核酸(RNA)。采用视觉模拟评分法评估参与者的不适程度。然后,比较两组采样后的不适程度和循环阈值(Ct)值。

结果

本研究共纳入50例患者。采样过程中未出现与利多卡因相关的并发症。使用利多卡因浸润拭子,COVID-19住院患者感觉更舒适(鼻咽部3.44±1.42 vs 5.68±0.95,P<.01;口咽部4.4±1.53 vs 8.92±0.91,P<.01)。鼻咽拭子标本的Ct值普遍低于口咽拭子标本。两组Ct值结果之间无统计学显著差异。使用利多卡因浸润拭子对COVID-19进行采样可减轻患者的不适。该方法值得在新型冠状病毒采样中推广。

结论

使用利多卡因浸润拭子对COVID-19进行采样可减轻患者的不适,且对Ct值无明显影响。该方法值得在新型冠状病毒采样中推广。

相似文献

1
Research on sampling of COVID-19 with lidocaine-soaked swab.利多卡因浸润拭子用于新冠病毒采样的研究
Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 Aug 15;104(33):e43918. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000043918.
2
The effect of sample site and collection procedure on identification of SARS-CoV-2 infection.样本采集部位和采集程序对严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)感染鉴定的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Dec 16;12(12):CD014780. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014780.
3
Saline gargle collection method is comparable to nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swabbing for the molecular detection and sequencing of SARS-CoV-2 in Botswana.在博茨瓦纳,盐水漱口采集方法在SARS-CoV-2的分子检测和测序方面与鼻咽/口咽拭子采集方法相当。
Microbiol Spectr. 2025 Jul;13(7):e0202324. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.02023-24. Epub 2025 May 22.
4
Laboratory-based molecular test alternatives to RT-PCR for the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection.基于实验室的分子检测替代 RT-PCR 用于 SARS-CoV-2 感染的诊断。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Oct 14;10(10):CD015618. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015618.
5
High Concordance Between SYBR Green and TaqMan PCR for SARS-CoV-2 Detection in Nasopharyngeal and Saliva Samples.用于检测鼻咽和唾液样本中新型冠状病毒的SYBR Green法与TaqMan PCR法具有高度一致性。
Viruses. 2025 Aug 18;17(8):1130. doi: 10.3390/v17081130.
6
Head-to-head comparison of anterior nares and nasopharyngeal swabs for SARS-CoV-2 antigen detection in a community drive-through test centre in the UK.在英国一个社区免下车检测中心对前鼻孔拭子和鼻咽拭子进行SARS-CoV-2抗原检测的直接比较。
BMJ Open Respir Res. 2025 Mar 22;12(1):e001747. doi: 10.1136/bmjresp-2023-001747.
7
SARS-CoV-2 positivity rates in tear secretions of inpatient COVID-positive individuals in an Indian tertiary care setting.印度一家三级医疗机构中新冠病毒检测呈阳性住院患者泪液分泌物中的新冠病毒2型阳性率。
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2025 Feb 1;73(2):273-279. doi: 10.4103/IJO.IJO_2347_23. Epub 2024 Jul 11.
8
Colorimetric RT-LAMP for SARS-CoV-2 detection from nasopharyngeal swabs or crude saliva: a multicountry diagnostic accuracy study in Africa.用于从鼻咽拭子或未经处理的唾液中检测新型冠状病毒的比色逆转录环介导等温扩增技术:一项在非洲开展的多国诊断准确性研究
Lancet Glob Health. 2025 Jul;13(7):e1258-e1267. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(25)00150-0.
9
Comparison of Mid-turbinate Nasal Swabs, Saliva, and Nasopharyngeal Swabs for SARS-CoV-2 Reverse Transcription-Polymerase Chain Reaction Testing in Pediatric Outpatients.儿童门诊患者中鼻甲鼻拭子、唾液和鼻咽拭子用于SARS-CoV-2逆转录-聚合酶链反应检测的比较
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2022 Sep 1;146(9):1056-1061. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2021-0625-SA.
10
A multicenter study to assess the performance of the point-of-care RT-PCR Cobas SARS-CoV-2 & Influenza A/B nucleic acid test for use on the Cobas Liat system in comparison with centralized assays across healthcare facilities in the United States.一项多中心研究,旨在评估即时检测的逆转录聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)科巴斯SARS-CoV-2及甲型/乙型流感核酸检测在科巴斯Liat系统上的性能,并与美国各医疗机构的集中检测方法进行比较。
J Clin Microbiol. 2025 Aug 13;63(8):e0145924. doi: 10.1128/jcm.01459-24. Epub 2025 Jul 2.

本文引用的文献

1
Complications of Nasopharyngeal Swabs and Safe Procedures for COVID-19 Testing Based on Anatomical Knowledge.基于解剖学知识的鼻咽拭子并发症和 COVID-19 检测安全程序。
J Korean Med Sci. 2022 Mar 21;37(11):e88. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2022.37.e88.
2
SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant: Characteristics and prevention.严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2型奥密克戎变异株:特征与预防
MedComm (2020). 2021 Dec 16;2(4):838-845. doi: 10.1002/mco2.110. eCollection 2021 Dec.
3
Lessons learned 1 year after SARS-CoV-2 emergence leading to COVID-19 pandemic.SARS-CoV-2 引发 COVID-19 大流行一年后的经验教训。
Emerg Microbes Infect. 2021 Dec;10(1):507-535. doi: 10.1080/22221751.2021.1898291.
4
Performance of Saliva, Oropharyngeal Swabs, and Nasal Swabs for SARS-CoV-2 Molecular Detection: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.唾液、咽拭子和鼻拭子用于 SARS-CoV-2 分子检测的性能:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Clin Microbiol. 2021 Apr 20;59(5). doi: 10.1128/JCM.02881-20.
5
Topical lignocaine anaesthesia for oropharyngeal sampling for COVID-19.局部利多卡因麻醉用于 COVID-19 的口咽部采样。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2021 May;278(5):1669-1673. doi: 10.1007/s00405-020-06402-z. Epub 2020 Oct 1.
6
An overview of COVID-19.关于 COVID-19 的概述。
J Zhejiang Univ Sci B. 2020 May;21(5):343-360. doi: 10.1631/jzus.B2000083. Epub 2020 May 8.
7
Recent progress on the diagnosis of 2019 Novel Coronavirus.新型冠状病毒诊断的最新进展。
Transbound Emerg Dis. 2020 Jul;67(4):1485-1491. doi: 10.1111/tbed.13620. Epub 2020 May 31.
8
Airborne transmission of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 to healthcare workers: a narrative review.空气传播严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 2 对医护人员的影响:叙事性综述。
Anaesthesia. 2020 Aug;75(8):1086-1095. doi: 10.1111/anae.15093. Epub 2020 May 8.