Gaikwad Shweta A, Jagtap Amit K, Madhav V N V
Department of Prosthodontics, Crown & Bridge and Implantology, Dr. D. Y. Patil Dental College and Hospital, Dr. D. Y. Patil Vidyapeeth, Pimpri, Pune, 411018, India.
J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2025 Nov-Dec;15(6):1248-1253. doi: 10.1016/j.jobcr.2025.08.001. Epub 2025 Aug 11.
The aim of this study was to compare the optical performance of pressable and milled lithium disilicate crowns, focusing on their shade-matching accuracy against the VITA Classical A1 shade guide.
20 samples each of lithium disilicate crowns were fabricated using pressable and CAD/CAM-milled techniques and VITA A1 shade tab as the control. A spectrophotometer was used to measure the optical properties of the crown, namely, brightness (L∗), red-green (a∗), blue-yellow (b∗), and color difference (ΔE) values. Data obtained was analyzed statistically to assess shade-matching precision and optical differences.
The lightness (L∗) value of the pressable group (92.22 ± 2.67) was significantly higher than that of the milled group (88.10 ± 1.08) and the control group (87.78 ± 0.08). Regarding the red-green axis (a∗), the pressable group had the highest mean value (0.97 ± 0.37), followed by milled (0.85 ± 0.24) and control (0.35 ± 0.11), showed statistically significant differences. In terms of yellow-blue chroma (b), the pressable crowns recorded the highest value (14.89 ± 0.99), followed by the control (14.43 ± 0.07) and milled (13.56 ± 0.25). Milled crowns exhibited a significantly lower ΔE (1.49 ± 0.42) compared to pressable crowns (4.71 ± 2.55).
Milled lithium disilicate crowns showed superior shade-matching accuracy, which exhibited lower color difference (ΔE) values, inferring closer color alignment with the A1 standard. Pressable crowns showed enhanced translucency and esthetic vibrancy as contributed by higher brightness and chromatic intensity, but exhibited greater variability in color matching.
本研究旨在比较可压制成型和铣削加工的二硅酸锂全冠的光学性能,重点关注其与VITA经典A1比色板的颜色匹配精度。
使用可压制成型和CAD/CAM铣削技术分别制作20个二硅酸锂全冠样本,并以VITA A1比色片作为对照。使用分光光度计测量全冠的光学性能,即亮度(L∗)、红绿色度(a∗)、黄蓝色度(b∗)和色差(ΔE)值。对获得的数据进行统计分析,以评估颜色匹配精度和光学差异。
可压制成型组的亮度(L∗)值(92.22 ± 2.67)显著高于铣削加工组(88.10 ± 1.08)和对照组(87.78 ± 0.08)。在红绿色轴(a∗)方面,可压制成型组的平均值最高(0.97 ± 0.37),其次是铣削加工组(0.85 ± 0.24)和对照组(0.35 ± 0.11),差异具有统计学意义。在黄蓝色度(b)方面,可压制成型全冠的值最高(14.89 ± 0.99),其次是对照组(14.43 ± 0.07)和铣削加工组(13.56 ± 0.25)。与可压制成型全冠(4.71 ± 2.55)相比,铣削加工全冠的ΔE值显著更低(1.49 ± 0.42)。
铣削加工的二硅酸锂全冠显示出更高的颜色匹配精度,表现为更低的色差(ΔE)值,表明其颜色与A1标准更接近。可压制成型全冠由于更高的亮度和色彩强度而具有更高的透明度和美学活力,但在颜色匹配方面表现出更大的变异性。