• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估YouTube视频作为面瘫康复训练信息来源的情况。

Evaluation of YouTube videos as a source of information on facial paralysis exercises.

作者信息

Engin Onur, Kızılırmak Karataş Ayşe Sezgi, Taşpınar Betül, Taşpınar Ferruh

机构信息

Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, Izmir Democracy University, Izmir, Turkey.

Department of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health Sciences, Izmir Democracy University, Izmir, Turkey.

出版信息

NeuroRehabilitation. 2024 Sep 18. doi: 10.3233/NRE-240027.

DOI:10.3233/NRE-240027
PMID:39302386
Abstract

BACKGROUND

YouTube has emerged as an important source for obtaining information regarding health issues.

OBJECTIVE

The study aimed to assess the reliability and quality of facial paralysis exercise videos that are accessible on the YouTube platform.

METHODS

The investigation was carried out on Youtube, utilizing the keyword "facial paralysis exercises". We listed the first 100 videos based on relevancy. The quality and reliability of the videos were assessed using DISCERN, the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) Benchmark Criteria, the Global Quality Scale (GQS), and the Video Power Index (VPI).

RESULTS

Out of 100 studies, we excluded 52 and included the remaining 48. The scores we obtained for the videos were as follows: DISCERN Quality (2.92±0.91), DISCERN Total (39.16±6.75), JAMA (2.09±0.55), and GQS (3.00±0.89). Our study also revealed that videos uploaded by healthcare professionals had significantly higher DISCERN total, JAMA and VPI scores compared to those uploaded by non-healthcare professionals (p = 0.018, 0.001 and 0.023, respectively). Additionally, we observed a positive and statistically significant correlation between the DISCERN quality score, total score, JAMA, and video features.

CONCLUSION

The facial paralysis exercise videos were determined to be of medium to low quality. Higher-quality videos need to be produced.

摘要

背景

YouTube已成为获取健康问题相关信息的重要来源。

目的

本研究旨在评估YouTube平台上可获取的面瘫锻炼视频的可靠性和质量。

方法

在YouTube上进行调查,使用关键词“面瘫锻炼”。我们根据相关性列出了前100个视频。使用DISCERN、美国医学会杂志(JAMA)基准标准、全球质量量表(GQS)和视频影响力指数(VPI)评估视频的质量和可靠性。

结果

在100项研究中,我们排除了52项,纳入了其余48项。我们为这些视频获得的分数如下:DISCERN质量(2.92±0.91)、DISCERN总分(39.16±6.75)、JAMA(2.09±0.55)和GQS(3.00±0.89)。我们的研究还表明,与非医疗专业人员上传的视频相比,医疗专业人员上传的视频在DISCERN总分、JAMA和VPI分数上显著更高(p分别为0.018、0.001和0.023)。此外,我们观察到DISCERN质量得分、总分、JAMA与视频特征之间存在正相关且具有统计学意义。

结论

面瘫锻炼视频被判定为中低质量。需要制作更高质量的视频。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of YouTube videos as a source of information on facial paralysis exercises.评估YouTube视频作为面瘫康复训练信息来源的情况。
NeuroRehabilitation. 2024 Sep 18. doi: 10.3233/NRE-240027.
2
Quality of online video resources concerning patient education for neck pain: A YouTube-based quality-control study.基于 YouTube 的视频质量控制研究:在线视频资源在颈椎病患者教育中的质量。
Front Public Health. 2022 Sep 21;10:972348. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.972348. eCollection 2022.
3
Analysis of videos about vesicoureteral reflux on YouTube.YouTube上关于膀胱输尿管反流的视频分析。
J Pediatr Urol. 2021 Dec;17(6):858.e1-858.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2021.10.006. Epub 2021 Oct 15.
4
Evaluation of the Accuracy and Quality of Information in Videos About Lateral Epicondylitis Shared on Internet Video Sharing Services.互联网视频分享服务上关于外侧上髁炎的视频信息准确性和质量评估
Cureus. 2022 Feb 24;14(2):e22583. doi: 10.7759/cureus.22583. eCollection 2022 Feb.
5
A quality analysis of nocturnal enuresis videos on YouTube.YouTube 上遗尿症视频的质量分析。
J Pediatr Urol. 2021 Aug;17(4):449.e1-449.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2021.03.014. Epub 2021 Mar 24.
6
Evaluation of the Reliability, Utility, and Quality of the Information in Sleeve Gastrectomy Videos Shared on Open Access Video Sharing Platform YouTube.开放获取视频分享平台YouTube上袖状胃切除术视频中信息的可靠性、实用性及质量评估
Obes Surg. 2019 May;29(5):1477-1484. doi: 10.1007/s11695-019-03738-2.
7
Evaluation of the reliability and quality of YouTube videos as a source of information for transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation.评估 YouTube 视频作为经皮神经电刺激信息源的可靠性和质量。
PeerJ. 2023 Jul 21;11:e15412. doi: 10.7717/peerj.15412. eCollection 2023.
8
Is the information about lateral epicondylitis on the YouTube platform reliable and of good quality?YouTube 平台上关于外侧肱骨上髁炎的信息可靠且质量高吗?
Phys Sportsmed. 2023 Oct;51(5):458-462. doi: 10.1080/00913847.2022.2129504. Epub 2022 Sep 29.
9
YouTube as a source of information on fibromyalgia.YouTube 作为纤维肌痛信息来源。
Int J Rheum Dis. 2021 Feb;24(2):197-202. doi: 10.1111/1756-185X.14043. Epub 2020 Dec 23.
10
The Quality, Reliability, and Popularity of YouTube Education Videos for Vestibular Rehabilitation: A Cross-sectional Study.YouTube 教育视频在前庭康复中的质量、可靠性和人气:一项横断面研究。
Otol Neurotol. 2021 Sep 1;42(8):e1077-e1083. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000003197.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessing the quality of myopia prevention videos on Chinese short video platforms: a cross-sectional content analysis by source.评估中国短视频平台上近视预防视频的质量:基于来源的横断面内容分析
BMJ Open. 2025 Aug 21;15(8):e102818. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-102818.