Wang Ziru, Duan Shuning, Chen Xier, Deng Huili, Wang Yunqi, Ni Guoxin
School of Sport Medicine and Rehabilitation, Beijing Sport University, Beijing, China.
School of Sports Medicine, Wuhan Sports University, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
BMJ Open. 2025 Aug 22;15(8):e100546. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-100546.
To understand current practices and identify barriers and facilitators to implementing guideline-recommended core osteoarthritis (OA) treatments in China.
An exploratory mixed-methods design SETTING: Public and private clinical institutions across mainland China.
A total of 498 healthcare professionals participated. The qualitative phase included semistructured interviews (n=15) and a qualitative survey (n=181). The quantitative phase consisted of a survey with 302 respondents across 19 provinces, representing seven health professions.
Five themes identified as barriers during the qualitative phase: misconceptions about OA; limitations in current medical insurance policies; insufficient multidisciplinary collaboration; lack of workplace support and low patient adherence to self-management. Three themes identified as facilitators: telehealth and community-based delivery pathways; professional training and patient education resources; and personalised services with positive feedback. Quantitative findings showed that physical agent therapy (56%) and traditional Chinese medicine (22%) were the most frequently used OA treatments, while exercise therapy was implemented in only 9% of cases. The average OA knowledge score was 31.2 (±8.9) out of 55, with the lowest self-rated confidence in interdisciplinary collaboration (3.4±0.1, 'somewhat confident'). The most applicable factors impacting the implementation of core OA treatments included patient comorbidities, knowledge of pain science and exercise therapy, and financial support (all 2.8±0.8, 'applicable').
The uptake of core OA treatments in China remains suboptimal, constrained by limitations in insurance coverage, workforce capacity and interdisciplinary integration. Enhancing telehealth accessibility, strengthening professional training and refining policy incentives may help bridge this evidence-practice gap and improve OA management in China.
了解中国目前实施骨关节炎(OA)指南推荐的核心治疗方法的现状,识别其中的障碍和促进因素。
探索性混合方法设计
中国大陆的公立和私立临床机构。
共有498名医疗保健专业人员参与。定性阶段包括半结构化访谈(n = 15)和定性调查(n = 181)。定量阶段包括对来自19个省份的302名受访者进行的调查,涵盖七个卫生专业。
定性阶段确定的五个障碍主题:对OA的误解;当前医疗保险政策的局限性;多学科协作不足;缺乏工作场所支持以及患者自我管理依从性低。确定的三个促进因素主题:远程医疗和基于社区的服务途径;专业培训和患者教育资源;以及提供积极反馈的个性化服务。定量研究结果表明,物理因子治疗(56%)和中医(22%)是最常用的OA治疗方法,而运动疗法仅在9%的病例中实施。OA知识平均得分为55分中的31.2分(±8.9),对跨学科协作的自我评定信心最低(3.4±0.1,“有些信心”)。影响核心OA治疗实施的最适用因素包括患者合并症、疼痛科学和运动疗法知识以及经济支持(均为2.8±0.8,“适用”)。
中国核心OA治疗方法的采用率仍不理想,受到保险覆盖范围、劳动力能力和跨学科整合方面的限制。提高远程医疗的可及性、加强专业培训和完善政策激励措施可能有助于弥合这一证据与实践之间的差距,并改善中国的OA管理。