• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

远端直肠癌新辅助治疗和手术平台的变化与演进对肿瘤学结局及括约肌保留的影响:一项23年的回顾性研究经验

The Shifting and Evolving Neoadjuvant Treatments and Surgical Platforms on Oncological Outcomes and Sphincter Preservation in Distal Rectal Cancer: A 23-Year Retrospective Experience.

作者信息

Shadmanov Niyaz, Aliyev Vusal, Bakır Barıs, Goksel Suha, Asoglu Oktar

机构信息

Bogazici Academy for Clinical Sciences, Acisu Street, Apart. No 16, 34357/Beşiktaş, Istanbul, Turkey.

Department of General Surgery, Alibey Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.

出版信息

J Gastrointest Cancer. 2025 Aug 24;56(1):177. doi: 10.1007/s12029-025-01303-y.

DOI:10.1007/s12029-025-01303-y
PMID:40849600
Abstract

PURPOSE

This study aims to evaluate how advancements in surgical technology and evolving neoadjuvant treatment (NAT) protocols have influenced clinical, pathological, and long-term oncological outcomes in patients with locally advanced distal rectal cancer (LADRC). Particular emphasis is placed on how the evolving practice of a single high-volume colorectal surgeon has mirrored these developments over a 23-year period.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort included 561 patients with LADRC who underwent NAT between 2001 and 2024. Patients were stratified into two groups based on the year 2013, which marked the institutional adoption of robotic surgery, high-resolution 3-Tesla MRI, and the formal implementation of the Watch-and-Wait (W&W) strategy: Group I (2001-2012) and Group II (2013-2024).

RESULTS

The median follow-up duration was significantly longer in Group 1 (191 ± 2.29 months) compared to Group 2 (71 ± 2.81 months). Local recurrence (LR) occurred in 11.6% of patients in Group 1 and 6.9% in Group 2 (p = 0.107), while distant metastasis (DM) was observed in 15.5% and 10.6%, respectively (p = 0.178) (Fig. 2). Disease-free survival (DFS) at 5 years was 67.4% (95% CI: 58.6-74.8) in Group 1 and 80.1% (95% CI: 75.6-83.8) in Group 2 (p = 0.003). At 10 years, DFS was 65.2% (95% CI: 58.6-74.8) and 79.4% (95% CI: 74.7-83.3) in Groups 1 and 2, respectively (p = 0.006). Similarly, overall survival (OS) at 5 years was 78.0% (95% CI: 67.6-82.4) in Group 1 and 91.7% (95% CI: 87.9-93.3) in Group 2 (p < 0.001). At 10 years, OS was 73.4% (95% CI: 66.0-81.1) and 90.5% (95% CI: 87.3-92.9), respectively (p < 0.001). Additionally, permanent stoma-free survival (PSFS) improved significantly over time, from 56.5% in Group 1 to 85.8% in Group 2 (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The integration of robotic surgery, high-resolution MRI, and the W&W strategy has significantly improved oncological outcomes and sphincter preservation rates in patients with LADRC over the past two decades.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估手术技术的进步和不断演变的新辅助治疗(NAT)方案如何影响局部晚期低位直肠癌(LADRC)患者的临床、病理和长期肿瘤学结局。特别强调了在23年期间,一位高年资结直肠外科医生不断变化的实践是如何反映这些进展的。

方法

本回顾性队列研究纳入了2001年至2024年间接受NAT的561例LADRC患者。根据2013年进行分层,该年份标志着机构开始采用机器人手术、高分辨率3特斯拉MRI以及正式实施观察等待(W&W)策略:第一组(2001 - 2012年)和第二组(2013 - 2024年)。

结果

第一组的中位随访时间(191±2.29个月)显著长于第二组(71±2.81个月)。第一组11.6%的患者发生局部复发(LR),第二组为6.9%(p = 0.107),远处转移(DM)分别为15.5%和10.6%(p = 0.178)(图2)。第一组5年无病生存率(DFS)为67.4%(95%CI:58.6 - 74.8),第二组为80.1%(95%CI:75.6 - 83.8)(p = 0.003)。10年时,第一组和第二组的DFS分别为65.2%(95%CI:58.6 - 74.8)和79.4%(95%CI:74.7 - 83.3)(p = 0.006)。同样,第一组5年总生存率(OS)为78.0%(95%CI:67.6 - 82.4),第二组为91.7%(95%CI:87.9 - 93.3)(p < 0.001)。10年时,OS分别为73.4%(95%CI:66.0 - 81.1)和90.5%(95%CI:87.3 - 92.9)(p < 0.001)。此外,无永久性造口生存率(PSFS)随时间显著提高,从第一组的56.5%提高到第二组的85.8%(p < 0.001)。

结论

在过去二十年中,机器人手术、高分辨率MRI和W&W策略的整合显著改善了LADRC患者的肿瘤学结局和括约肌保留率。

相似文献

1
The Shifting and Evolving Neoadjuvant Treatments and Surgical Platforms on Oncological Outcomes and Sphincter Preservation in Distal Rectal Cancer: A 23-Year Retrospective Experience.远端直肠癌新辅助治疗和手术平台的变化与演进对肿瘤学结局及括约肌保留的影响:一项23年的回顾性研究经验
J Gastrointest Cancer. 2025 Aug 24;56(1):177. doi: 10.1007/s12029-025-01303-y.
2
Oncological Outcomes of Intersphincteric Resection Versus Abdominoperineal Resection for ypT3 Low Rectal Cancer After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy: A Multicenter Retrospective Analysis.新辅助放化疗后ypT3期低位直肠癌行括约肌间切除术与腹会阴联合切除术的肿瘤学结局:一项多中心回顾性分析
Dis Colon Rectum. 2025 Aug 1;68(8):951-961. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000003821. Epub 2025 May 7.
3
Oncologic outcomes of watch-and-wait strategy or surgery for low to intermediate rectal cancer in clinical complete remission after adjuvant chemotherapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.辅助化疗后临床完全缓解的低至中危直肠肿瘤行观察等待策略或手术的肿瘤学结局:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2023 Oct 3;38(1):246. doi: 10.1007/s00384-023-04534-2.
4
Outcomes of Distal Rectal Cancer Patients Who Did Not Qualify for Watch-and-Wait: Comparison of Intersphincteric Resection Versus Abdominoperineal Resection.不符合观察等待条件的低位直肠癌患者的结局:括约肌间切除术与腹会阴联合切除术的比较
Ann Surg Oncol. 2025 Jan;32(1):128-136. doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-16316-3. Epub 2024 Oct 12.
5
Rectal Cancer Watch-and-Wait Management: Experience of 545 Patients From the US Rectal Cancer Research Group.直肠癌观察等待管理:来自美国直肠癌研究小组的545例患者的经验
Dis Colon Rectum. 2025 Feb 1;68(2):180-189. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000003586. Epub 2024 Nov 7.
6
What To Do With Suspected Nodal Regrowth on MRI During Follow-Up in an Organ Preservation Approach for Rectal Cancer?在直肠癌器官保留治疗的随访过程中,对于MRI检查发现的可疑淋巴结再生该如何处理?
Dis Colon Rectum. 2024 Dec 1;67(12):1528-1535. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000003385. Epub 2024 Sep 6.
7
Feasibility and outcomes of robotic sphincter-preserving surgery for rectal cancer after neoadjuvant treatment in patients with preexisting colostomy.新辅助治疗后存在肠造口的直肠癌患者行机器人保肛手术的可行性和结局。
Tech Coloproctol. 2024 Aug 13;28(1):102. doi: 10.1007/s10151-024-02980-w.
8
Comparison of laparoscopic versus robot-assisted sugery for rectal cancer after neo-adjuvant therapy: a large volume single center experience.新辅助治疗后腹腔镜与机器人辅助手术治疗直肠癌的比较:一项大样本单中心经验
BMC Surg. 2025 Mar 12;25(1):98. doi: 10.1186/s12893-025-02764-5.
9
Tailored selection of the interval between neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and surgery for locally advanced rectal cancer: analysis based on the pathologic stage or chemoradiation response.局部晚期直肠癌新辅助放化疗与手术间隔时间的个体化选择:基于病理分期或放化疗反应的分析
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2015 Apr;141(4):719-28. doi: 10.1007/s00432-014-1843-8. Epub 2014 Oct 9.
10
Correlation Between Grade of Clinical Response to Neoadjuvant Therapy for Rectal Cancer and Oncologic Outcomes in the Era of Watch-and-Wait.等待观察时代直肠癌新辅助治疗临床反应分级与肿瘤学结局的相关性
Dis Colon Rectum. 2025 Mar 1;68(3):300-307. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000003538. Epub 2024 Nov 18.

本文引用的文献

1
Perioperative and long-term oncological outcomes of robotic versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision: a retrospective study of 672 patients.机器人与腹腔镜全直肠系膜切除术的围手术期和长期肿瘤学结果:672 例患者的回顾性研究。
J Robot Surg. 2024 Mar 30;18(1):144. doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-01922-w.
2
Chemoradiation and consolidation chemotherapy for rectal cancer provides a high rate of organ preservation with a very good long-term oncological outcome: a single-center cohort series.直肠癌的放化疗和巩固化疗可提供高的器官保存率和非常好的长期肿瘤学结果:一项单中心队列研究。
World J Surg Oncol. 2022 Nov 10;20(1):358. doi: 10.1186/s12957-022-02816-7.
3
Short-course radiotherapy followed by chemotherapy before total mesorectal excision (TME) versus preoperative chemoradiotherapy, TME, and optional adjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer (RAPIDO): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial.
短程放疗联合化疗后行全直肠系膜切除术(TME)与术前放化疗、TME 及辅助化疗在局部进展期直肠癌(RAPIDO)中的应用:一项随机、开放标签、3 期临床试验。
Lancet Oncol. 2021 Jan;22(1):29-42. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30555-6. Epub 2020 Dec 7.
4
Standardized Laparoscopic Sphincter-preserving Total Mesorectal Excision For Rectal Cancer: Median of 10 Years' Long-term Oncologic Outcome in 217 Unselected Consecutive Patients.标准化腹腔镜保留括约肌全直肠系膜切除术治疗直肠癌:217例未经选择的连续患者10年长期肿瘤学结局的中位数
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2019 Oct;29(5):354-361. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000664.
5
Effect of Robotic-Assisted vs Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery on Risk of Conversion to Open Laparotomy Among Patients Undergoing Resection for Rectal Cancer: The ROLARR Randomized Clinical Trial.机器人辅助手术与传统腹腔镜手术对直肠癌切除患者中转开腹风险的影响:ROLARR随机临床试验
JAMA. 2017 Oct 24;318(16):1569-1580. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.7219.
6
Magnetic resonance imaging for clinical management of rectal cancer: Updated recommendations from the 2016 European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR) consensus meeting.磁共振成像在直肠癌临床管理中的应用:2016 年欧洲胃肠道和腹部放射学会(ESGAR)共识会议的更新建议。
Eur Radiol. 2018 Apr;28(4):1465-1475. doi: 10.1007/s00330-017-5026-2. Epub 2017 Oct 17.
7
Preoperative versus postoperative chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer: results of the German CAO/ARO/AIO-94 randomized phase III trial after a median follow-up of 11 years.局部进展期直肠癌术前与术后放化疗的比较:中位随访 11 年后德国 CAO/ARO/AIO-94 随机 III 期临床试验结果。
J Clin Oncol. 2012 Jun 1;30(16):1926-33. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.40.1836. Epub 2012 Apr 23.
8
Definition and grading of anastomotic leakage following anterior resection of the rectum: a proposal by the International Study Group of Rectal Cancer.直肠前切除术后吻合口漏的定义和分级:直肠癌国际研究组的建议。
Surgery. 2010 Mar;147(3):339-51. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2009.10.012. Epub 2009 Dec 11.
9
Improved overall survival with oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and leucovorin as adjuvant treatment in stage II or III colon cancer in the MOSAIC trial.在MOSAIC试验中,奥沙利铂、氟尿嘧啶和亚叶酸作为II期或III期结肠癌辅助治疗可提高总生存率。
J Clin Oncol. 2009 Jul 1;27(19):3109-16. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.20.6771. Epub 2009 May 18.
10
Effect of the plane of surgery achieved on local recurrence in patients with operable rectal cancer: a prospective study using data from the MRC CR07 and NCIC-CTG CO16 randomised clinical trial.手术平面的达成对可手术直肠癌患者局部复发的影响:一项使用MRC CR07和NCIC-CTG CO16随机临床试验数据的前瞻性研究。
Lancet. 2009 Mar 7;373(9666):821-8. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60485-2.