Tian Xu, Shuai Ting, Jimenez-Herrera Maria F, Shdefat Aisha Al, Shang Hongcai, Liu Xiaoling, Ren Yi
Division of Sci-Tech and Foreign Affairs, Chongqing Center for Evidence- Based Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chongqing Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Chongqing, 400020, China.
Second Clinical Division, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology & National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases & National Engineering Laboratory for Digital and Material Technology of Stomatology & Beijing Key Laboratory of Digital Stomatology, Beijing, 100081, China.
BMC Nurs. 2025 Aug 27;24(1):1123. doi: 10.1186/s12912-025-03783-6.
Registered nurses frequently face moral sufferings due to unavoidable ethical conflicts, which highlights the importance of moral resilience as a mitigating resource. A valid and reliable tool is essential to effectively measure moral resilience.
The study aimed to translate, culturally adapt, and evaluate the psychometrics of the revised Rushton Moral Resilience Scale (RMRS) for use with Chinese registered nurses.
A methodological study employing a cross-sectional survey design.
A convenience sample of 432 Chinese registered nurses was recruited via an online survey platform from October to November 2023.
The study received approval from the Ethics Committees of Hunan Traditional Chinese Medical College (Approval number: YXLL202401004).
Not applicable.
The revised RMRS was successfully translated and culturally adapted into the Chinese version. The scale-level content validity index (CVI) was 0.906, with item-level CVIs ranging from 0.833 to 1.000. Explanatory factor analysis (EFA) generated 12 items on a three-factor model for the revised Chinese version (Chi-RMRS-12). Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) supported this structure, with factor loadings for each item ranging from 0.42 to 0.93. The scale demonstrated a Cronbach's α coefficient was 0.734, with dimensions ranging from 0.657 to 0.831, and a composite reliability (CR) coefficient of 0.902, with dimension-specific values from 0.628 to 0.811. Significant correlations were found among the Chi-RMRS-12, the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale-10 (CD-RISC-10) and the Moral Distress Thermometer (MDT).
The Chi-RMRS-12 effectively measures moral resilience of Chinese registered nurses, demonstrating strong validity and reliability. This scale can be used in research and practice to assess moral resilience, aiding nursing managers in monitoring the well-being of Chinese registered nurses and developing interventions to enhance their professional resilience and ensure quality of care.
注册护士经常因不可避免的伦理冲突而面临道德痛苦,这凸显了道德复原力作为一种缓解资源的重要性。一个有效且可靠的工具对于有效测量道德复原力至关重要。
本研究旨在对修订后的拉什顿道德复原力量表(RMRS)进行翻译、文化调适,并评估其在中国注册护士中的心理测量学特性。
采用横断面调查设计的方法学研究。
2023年10月至11月,通过在线调查平台招募了432名中国注册护士作为便利样本。
本研究获得湖南中医药高等专科学校伦理委员会批准(批准号:YXLL202401004)。
不适用。
修订后的RMRS成功翻译并文化调适为中文版。量表层面的内容效度指数(CVI)为0.906,各条目层面的CVI范围为0.833至1.000。探索性因子分析(EFA)为修订后的中文版(Chi-RMRS-12)生成了一个三因子模型的12个条目。验证性因子分析(CFA)支持了这一结构,各条目的因子载荷范围为0.42至0.93。该量表的Cronbach's α系数为0.734,各维度范围为0.657至0.831,组合信度(CR)系数为0.902,各维度特异性值为0.628至0.811。在Chi-RMRS-12、康纳-戴维森复原力量表-10(CD-RISC-10)和道德痛苦温度计(MDT)之间发现了显著相关性。
Chi-RMRS-12有效地测量了中国注册护士的道德复原力,显示出很强的效度和信度。该量表可用于研究和实践中评估道德复原力,帮助护理管理者监测中国注册护士的福祉,并制定干预措施以增强他们的职业复原力并确保护理质量。