• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

护士对被监禁患者态度量表的编制:一项心理测量学研究。

Development of the Nurses' Attitudes Toward Incarcerated Patients Scale: A Psychometric Study.

作者信息

Dağci-Günal Büşra, Ayaz-Alkaya Sultan, Köse-Kabakcioğlu Neslihan, Kan Adnan

机构信息

Bandırma Onyedi Eylül University Faculty of Health Sciences, Balıkesir, Türkiye.

Gazi University Faculty of Nursing, Ankara, Türkiye.

出版信息

Int Nurs Rev. 2025 Sep;72(3):e70086. doi: 10.1111/inr.70086.

DOI:10.1111/inr.70086
PMID:40874718
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12392871/
Abstract

AIM

To develop an original scale to measure nurses' attitudes toward incarcerated patients and assess its psychometric properties.

METHODS

This study employed a psychometric testing approach involving test-retest design. The sample size was determined based on the rule of selecting a sample 5 to 10 times the number of scale items. The study included 672 nurses. Data were collected using the Descriptive Information Form and the Nurses' Attitudes Toward Incarcerated Patients Scale. Content validity was determined using the Lawshe technique. Construct validity was examined through exploratory (n1  =  336) and confirmatory factor analysis (n2  =  336). Internal consistency was assessed using Cronbach's alpha coefficient. Temporal stability was evaluated through the test-retest method conducted four weeks later (n  =  32).

RESULTS

The scale consists of 12 items and was categorized into three factors-discriminatory attitudes, emotional discomfort, and patient equality-accounting for 67.6% of the variance. Items with factor loadings between 0.69 and 0.85 supported the scale's validity. The fit indices from confirmatory factor analysis indicated an acceptable model fit. Internal consistency was confirmed with a Cronbach's alpha of 0.84. Test-retest reliability analysis showed moderate, significant correlations among subdimensions.

CONCLUSION

The scale is valid and reliable in assessing nurses' attitudes toward incarcerated patients. Future research should test its applicability across diverse cultural and geographical contexts to enhance generalizability.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING POLICY

This study underscores the need for policies addressing nurses' attitudes toward incarcerated patients. The developed scale may support the identification of biases and emotional discomfort, guiding targeted education and institutional interventions to promote equitable, ethical, and nonjudgmental healthcare practices.

摘要

目的

开发一种原创量表,以测量护士对被监禁患者的态度,并评估其心理测量特性。

方法

本研究采用心理测量测试方法,包括重测设计。样本量根据选择量表项目数量5至10倍的样本的规则确定。该研究纳入了672名护士。使用描述性信息表和护士对被监禁患者态度量表收集数据。使用劳希技术确定内容效度。通过探索性分析(n1 = 336)和验证性因素分析(n2 = 336)检验结构效度。使用克朗巴赫α系数评估内部一致性。通过四周后进行的重测法评估时间稳定性(n = 32)。

结果

该量表由12个项目组成,分为三个因素——歧视态度、情感不适和患者平等,解释了67.6%的方差。因子载荷在0.69至0.85之间的项目支持了量表的有效性。验证性因素分析的拟合指数表明模型拟合可接受。克朗巴赫α系数为0.84,证实了内部一致性。重测信度分析显示各子维度之间存在中度、显著的相关性。

结论

该量表在评估护士对被监禁患者的态度方面有效且可靠。未来的研究应测试其在不同文化和地理背景下的适用性,以提高普遍性。

对护理政策的启示

本研究强调了制定解决护士对被监禁患者态度问题的政策的必要性。所开发的量表可能有助于识别偏见和情感不适,指导有针对性的教育和机构干预,以促进公平、符合伦理和无偏见的医疗实践。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b83/12392871/c8b2321721fc/INR-72-0-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b83/12392871/941ba33b5de4/INR-72-0-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b83/12392871/c8b2321721fc/INR-72-0-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b83/12392871/941ba33b5de4/INR-72-0-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b83/12392871/c8b2321721fc/INR-72-0-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Development of the Nurses' Attitudes Toward Incarcerated Patients Scale: A Psychometric Study.护士对被监禁患者态度量表的编制:一项心理测量学研究。
Int Nurs Rev. 2025 Sep;72(3):e70086. doi: 10.1111/inr.70086.
2
Assessment of the Psychometric Properties of the Mask Usability Scale: A Measure of the Perceived Usability of N95 Respirators Among Healthcare Students and Staff.口罩可用性量表的心理测量特性评估:一项针对医护专业学生和工作人员对N95口罩感知可用性的测量。
J Adv Nurs. 2025 Aug;81(8):4613-4626. doi: 10.1111/jan.16590. Epub 2024 Nov 13.
3
Polish validation of soft skills questionnaire for nurses.护士软技能问卷的波兰语验证
Front Public Health. 2025 Jul 29;13:1597455. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1597455. eCollection 2025.
4
Development and psychometric evaluation of the nurses' competency in patient education scale: a sequential exploratory mixed-method study.护士患者教育能力量表的开发与心理测量学评估:一项序贯探索性混合方法研究
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Jul 1;25(1):872. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-07478-z.
5
Validity and reliability study of the Turkish version of the autism spectrum knowledge scale.自闭症谱系知识量表土耳其语版本的效度和信度研究
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2025 Jun 25;258:105204. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.105204.
6
Turkish adaptation of the artificial intelligence ethics scale (EAI): a validity and reliability study for nursing students.人工智能伦理量表(EAI)的土耳其语改编版:一项针对护理专业学生的效度和信度研究。
BMC Psychol. 2025 Aug 17;13(1):925. doi: 10.1186/s40359-025-03283-x.
7
Adaptation and validation of the Chinese version of the digital addiction scale for children (DASC).儿童数字成瘾量表中文版(DASC)的改编与验证
BMC Public Health. 2025 Jul 30;25(1):2599. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-23817-7.
8
Ethical Awareness in the Use of Large Language Models: Development and Validation of a Scale for Healthcare Professionals.医疗专业人员使用大语言模型时的伦理意识:一种量表的开发与验证
J Eval Clin Pract. 2025 Aug;31(5):e70241. doi: 10.1111/jep.70241.
9
Psychometric Evaluation of the Persian Version of the Professional Socialization Scale for Hospital Nurses: A Methodological Study.医院护士专业社会化量表波斯语版本的心理测量学评估:一项方法学研究
SAGE Open Nurs. 2025 Jun 19;11:23779608251345276. doi: 10.1177/23779608251345276. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
10
The Job Embeddedness Scale: A Test of Its Reliability and Validity in Chinese Perioperative Settings.工作嵌入量表:在中国围手术期环境中的信效度检验
J Nurs Manag. 2025 Jun 29;2025:9311215. doi: 10.1155/jonm/9311215. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Prevalence of severe mental illness among people in prison across 43 countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis.43个国家监狱人群中严重精神疾病的患病率:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Lancet Public Health. 2025 Feb;10(2):e97-e110. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(24)00280-9.
2
Training on Corrections and Health Within U.S. Academic Health Professions Education: A Scoping Review.美国学术健康专业教育中的惩教与健康培训:一项范围综述
J Correct Health Care. 2023 Oct;29(5):370-383. doi: 10.1089/jchc.22.06.0042. Epub 2023 Sep 7.
3
Estimated Use of Prescription Medications Among Individuals Incarcerated in Jails and State Prisons in the US.
美国监狱和州立监狱中被监禁个体的处方药使用估计数。
JAMA Health Forum. 2023 Apr 7;4(4):e230482. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2023.0482.
4
A Human Rights Framework for Advancing the Standard of Medical Care for Incarcerated People in the United States in the Time of COVID-19.推进美国新冠肺炎疫情期间被监禁人群医疗照护标准的人权框架
Health Hum Rights. 2022 Jun;24(1):59-75.
5
Undergraduate nursing students' attitudes towards incarcerated persons and their perceptions of clinical experiences.本科护生对服刑人员的态度及其对临床经验的看法。
J Prof Nurs. 2021 Nov-Dec;37(6):1154-1161. doi: 10.1016/j.profnurs.2021.10.004. Epub 2021 Oct 22.
6
The role of prison nursing: an integrative review.监狱护理的角色:综合述评。
Rev Esp Sanid Penit. 2021 May-Aug;23(2):76-85. doi: 10.18176/resp.00034.
7
COSMIN reporting guideline for studies on measurement properties of patient-reported outcome measures.CONSORT 报告规范:用于评估患者报告结局测量工具测量属性的研究。
Qual Life Res. 2021 Aug;30(8):2197-2218. doi: 10.1007/s11136-021-02822-4. Epub 2021 Apr 5.
8
Caring for Hospitalized Incarcerated Patients: Physician and Nurse Experience.照料住院的被监禁患者:医生和护士的经验。
J Gen Intern Med. 2022 Feb;37(2):485-487. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-06510-w. Epub 2021 Jan 6.
9
The Emotional Burden of the Correctional Health Care Advanced Practice Nurse.监狱医疗保健高级执业护士的情感负担。
J Correct Health Care. 2020 Oct;26(4):315-326. doi: 10.1177/1078345820953219. Epub 2020 Sep 24.
10
The Relationship Among Secondary Trauma, Self-Efficacy, and Correctional Nurses.监管护士的创伤后应激障碍、自我效能与三者之间的关系。
J Correct Health Care. 2020 Jul;26(3):207-214. doi: 10.1177/1078345820937763. Epub 2020 Jul 27.