Musci Rashelle J, Kush Joseph, Pas Elise T, Bradshaw Catherine P
Department of Mental Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 624 N. Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205.
Department of Psychology, James Madison University, 298 Port Republic Road, Harrisonburg, VA 22807.
J Exp Educ. 2024 Aug 9. doi: 10.1080/00220973.2024.2386983.
Given the increased focus of educational research on what works for whom and under what circumstances over the last decade, educational researchers are increasingly turning toward mixture models to identify heterogeneous subgroups among students. Such data are inherently nested, as students are nested within classrooms and schools. Yet there has been limited guidance on which specifications are most appropriate for enumerating latent classes when data are nested. This study utilized longitudinal, state-collected student data to demonstrate the impact of different specifications (i.e., ignoring nested data, using a post-hoc adjustment, and a parametric and non-parametric approach) of a latent class model when analyzing nested data. The overarching goal of this study was to provide the implications of four different model specifications commonly used to adjust for clustering in the context of mixture modeling. We highlight factors that may influence researchers' decisions to employ one approach over another when conducting multilevel mixture modeling. We conclude with a set of recommendations that may be particularly helpful for the use of these methods in educational settings, where nested data is common.
鉴于在过去十年中,教育研究越来越关注什么对谁有效以及在什么情况下有效,教育研究人员越来越倾向于使用混合模型来识别学生中的异质子群体。这类数据本质上是嵌套的,因为学生嵌套在班级和学校之中。然而,对于在数据嵌套时哪种规格最适合枚举潜在类别,指导却很有限。本研究利用国家收集的纵向学生数据,来展示在分析嵌套数据时,潜在类别模型的不同规格(即忽略嵌套数据、使用事后调整以及参数和非参数方法)所产生的影响。本研究的总体目标是提供在混合建模背景下通常用于调整聚类的四种不同模型规格的影响。我们强调了在进行多层次混合建模时,可能影响研究人员选择一种方法而非另一种方法的因素。我们最后给出了一组建议,这些建议对于在嵌套数据常见的教育环境中使用这些方法可能特别有帮助。