• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

泰国慢性非传染性疾病患者精神痛苦量表的编制

Development of the Spiritual Distress Scale for Patients with Chronic Non-communicable Diseases in Thailand.

作者信息

Chaiyasit Yuttachai, Chanbunlawat Khwanprapat

机构信息

Department of Pediatric and Adolescent Nursing, Ubon Ratchathani University, Ubon Ratchathani, Thailand.

Department of Adult and Gerontological Nursing, Faculty of Nursing, Ubon Ratchathani Rajabhat University, Ubon Ratchathani, Thailand.

出版信息

J Caring Sci. 2025 Jun 21;14(2):127-134. doi: 10.34172/jcs.025.33659. eCollection 2025 Jul.

DOI:10.34172/jcs.025.33659
PMID:40894973
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12397512/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

A spiritual distress scale for Thai patients with chronic non-communicable diseases (SDS-Thai-NCDs) has not yet been developed. This study aimed to develop and evaluate its psychometric properties.

METHODS

A methodological approach was applied to develop and verify the quality of the scale through seven steps: defining concepts, formatting the scale, creating items, expert review, item selection, field testing, and psychometric property testing. The sample included 400 Thai patients with chronic NCDs from eight provinces, representing all regions of Thailand. The scale's quality was assessed through content validity, discrimination index, reliability, and exploratory factor analysis.

RESULTS

Initially, the scale contained 48 items, which were reduced to 46 items after expert review, with a content validity index of 0.97. Item analysis and selection revealed 43 items that met the criteria, with corrected item-total correlations greater than 0.30 and discrimination indices ranging from 0.336 to 0.906. The scale demonstrated excellent internal consistency, with a Cronbach's alpha coefficient of 0.986. During the field test and psychometric property testing, the 43 items were grouped into five factors, with eigenvalues ranging from 3.494 to 8.385, explaining 70.80% of the variance. The five factors identified were: Loss of self-esteem, meaning, and purpose of life; Loss of relationships with oneself and others; Loss of hope and inner strength; Loss of relationship with nature and a higher power; and Physical expression.

CONCLUSION

The SDS-Thai-NCDs is an effective tool for assessing spiritual distress and can be used in clinical practice or research to guide interventions aimed at alleviating spiritual distress among patients with chronic NCDs.

摘要

引言

尚未开发出针对泰国慢性非传染性疾病患者的精神痛苦量表(SDS-Thai-NCDs)。本研究旨在开发并评估其心理测量特性。

方法

采用一种方法学途径,通过七个步骤来开发和验证该量表的质量:定义概念、设计量表格式、创建条目、专家评审、条目选择、现场测试和心理测量特性测试。样本包括来自泰国八个省份的400名患有慢性非传染性疾病的泰国患者,代表泰国所有地区。通过内容效度、区分指数、信度和探索性因子分析来评估该量表的质量。

结果

最初,该量表包含48个条目,专家评审后减少至46个条目,内容效度指数为0.97。条目分析和选择显示有43个条目符合标准,校正后的条目与总分相关性大于0.30,区分指数范围为0.336至0.906。该量表显示出极好的内部一致性,克朗巴哈系数为0.986。在现场测试和心理测量特性测试中,43个条目被归为五个因子,特征值范围为3.494至8.385,解释了70.80%的方差。确定的五个因子为:自尊、生活意义和目的的丧失;与自己及他人关系的丧失;希望和内心力量的丧失;与自然及更高力量关系的丧失;以及身体表现。

结论

SDS-Thai-NCDs是评估精神痛苦的有效工具,可用于临床实践或研究,以指导旨在减轻慢性非传染性疾病患者精神痛苦的干预措施。

相似文献

1
Development of the Spiritual Distress Scale for Patients with Chronic Non-communicable Diseases in Thailand.泰国慢性非传染性疾病患者精神痛苦量表的编制
J Caring Sci. 2025 Jun 21;14(2):127-134. doi: 10.34172/jcs.025.33659. eCollection 2025 Jul.
2
A New Measure of Quantified Social Health Is Associated With Levels of Discomfort, Capability, and Mental and General Health Among Patients Seeking Musculoskeletal Specialty Care.一种新的量化社会健康指标与寻求肌肉骨骼专科护理的患者的不适程度、能力以及心理和总体健康水平相关。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Apr 1;483(4):647-663. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003394. Epub 2025 Feb 5.
3
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
4
Translation and Psychometric Validation of Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire: The Urdu Version for Facilitating Multidisciplinary Research in Pakistan.《简短疾病认知问卷的翻译与心理测量学验证:用于促进巴基斯坦多学科研究的乌尔都语版本》
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2025 Aug 20;18:5075-5088. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S536636. eCollection 2025.
5
Transcultural Adaptation, Validation, Psychometric Analysis, and Interpretation of the 22-Item Thai Senior Technology Acceptance Model for Mobile Health Apps: Cross-Sectional Study.22项泰国移动健康应用老年人技术接受模型的跨文化调适、验证、心理测量分析及解读:横断面研究
JMIR Aging. 2025 Mar 11;8:e60156. doi: 10.2196/60156.
6
Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the pros and cons of anorexia nervosa (P-CAN-C) scale: a validation study in patients with anorexia nervosa.神经性厌食症利弊中文版量表(P-CAN-C)的心理测量学特性:一项针对神经性厌食症患者的效度研究
J Eat Disord. 2025 Jun 16;13(1):111. doi: 10.1186/s40337-025-01314-x.
7
Reliability, validity and feasibility of quality of life instruments for adult patients with cancer undergoing chemotherapy: result from a systematic review.癌症化疗成人患者生命质量测评工具的信度、效度和可行性:系统评价结果。
Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2012 Mar;10(1):27-52. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-1609.2012.00252.x.
8
Is It Possible to Develop a Patient-reported Experience Measure With Lower Ceiling Effect?是否有可能开发一种天花板效应较低的患者报告体验测量方法?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Apr 1;483(4):693-703. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003262. Epub 2024 Oct 25.
9
Establishment of nursing needs scale for elderly patients with urinary incontinence and its reliability and validity test.老年尿失禁患者护理需求量表的编制及其信效度检验
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Jul 24;12:1602675. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1602675. eCollection 2025.
10
Development and psychometric test of self-advocacy scale for patients with stroke.中风患者自我维权量表的编制与心理测量学测试
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 26;15(1):27247. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-08109-9.

本文引用的文献

1
Rethinking the Interpretation of Item Discrimination and Factor Loadings.重新思考项目区分度和因子载荷的解释
Educ Psychol Meas. 2019 Dec;79(6):1103-1132. doi: 10.1177/0013164419843164. Epub 2019 May 6.
2
The cultural expression of spiritual distress in Israel.以色列精神困扰的文化表现。
Support Care Cancer. 2018 Sep;26(9):3187-3193. doi: 10.1007/s00520-018-4177-2. Epub 2018 Mar 30.
3
Spiritual Distress Within Inpatient Settings-A Scoping Review of Patients' and Families' Experiences.住院环境中的精神困扰——对患者和家属体验的范围综述。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2018 Jul;56(1):122-145. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2018.03.009. Epub 2018 Mar 14.
4
Signs of Spiritual Distress and its Implications for Practice in Indian Palliative Care.印度姑息治疗中精神困扰的迹象及其对实践的影响。
Indian J Palliat Care. 2017 Jul-Sep;23(3):306-311. doi: 10.4103/IJPC.IJPC_24_17.
5
Impaired religiosity and spiritual distress in people living with HIV/AIDS.感染艾滋病毒/艾滋病者的宗教信仰受损与精神痛苦
Rev Gaucha Enferm. 2017 Jul 13;38(2):e67712. doi: 10.1590/1983-1447.2017.02.67712.
6
Prevalence and Nature of Spiritual Distress Among Palliative Care Patients in India.印度姑息治疗患者精神痛苦的患病率及性质
J Relig Health. 2017 Apr;56(2):530-544. doi: 10.1007/s10943-016-0252-5.
7
Spiritual distress-proposing a new definition and defining characteristics.精神困扰——提出一个新定义及界定特征
Int J Nurs Knowl. 2013 Jun;24(2):77-84. doi: 10.1111/j.2047-3095.2013.01234.x. Epub 2013 Mar 7.
8
Importance and usefulness of evaluating self-esteem in children.重视和评估儿童自尊的重要性和实用性。
Biopsychosoc Med. 2012 Mar 20;6:9. doi: 10.1186/1751-0759-6-9.
9
The spiritual distress assessment tool: an instrument to assess spiritual distress in hospitalised elderly persons.精神痛苦评估工具:一种评估住院老年人精神痛苦的工具。
BMC Geriatr. 2010 Dec 13;10:88. doi: 10.1186/1471-2318-10-88.
10
Establishing the validity of a spiritual distress scale for cancer patients hospitalized in southern Taiwan.建立适用于台湾南部住院癌症患者的精神痛苦量表的效度。
Int J Palliat Nurs. 2010 Mar;16(3):134-8. doi: 10.12968/ijpn.2010.16.3.47325.