Lasfer Chafika, Lahib Amal, Soliman Kariem, Gouda Shahinaz
Emergency Medicine, Fakeeh University Hospital, Dubai, ARE.
Cureus. 2025 Jul 31;17(7):e89106. doi: 10.7759/cureus.89106. eCollection 2025 Jul.
Background Point-of-care testing (POCT) is widely employed in emergency departments (EDs) for rapid clinical decision-making. However, the reliability of POCT for assessing critical electrolytes like potassium (K⁺) and sodium (Na⁺), compared to central laboratory methods, remains under scrutiny. Objective This quality improvement (QI) study aimed to evaluate and improve the reliability of POC venous blood gas (VBG) testing for K⁺ and Na⁺ by comparing results with central laboratory values. Structured within a Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycle, the objectives included quantifying the analytical concordance using Pearson correlation and Bland-Altman methods, identifying systematic bias or clinical outliers, and assessing turnaround time (TAT) to inform iterative improvements in POCT protocol integration within the ED. Methods A retrospective audit was conducted on 120 patients (N = 120, 100%) at Fakeeh University Hospital, Dubai, from March to May 2023. Paired K⁺ and Na⁺ values from POCT VBG analyzers and laboratory reports were compared. Statistical analysis included scatter plots, Pearson correlation, and Bland-Altman agreement. Results Of the 120 patients, 65 (54.2%) were male and 55 (45.8%) were female, with a mean age of 47.3 years (SD = 16.1). Chief presentations included chest pain (N = 38, 31.7%), dyspnea (N = 32, 26.7%), vomiting (N = 23, 19.2%), and signs of dehydration (N = 27, 22.5%). POCT K⁺ and Na⁺ values showed strong correlation with laboratory values (r = 0.91 and r = 0.88, respectively). The mean bias for K⁺ was +0.12 mmol/L, and for Na⁺ it was -1.2 mmol/L. TAT was significantly shorter for POCT (mean = 2.4 minutes) versus laboratory results (mean = 12.3 minutes), with a median delay of 10 minutes. Conclusion POCT demonstrated high reliability for K⁺ and Na⁺ evaluation in EDs. However, caution is advised when interpreting extreme values, especially hyperkalemia (> 5.5 mmol/L). Central laboratory confirmation should be considered in borderline or critical cases.
即时检验(POCT)在急诊科(ED)中被广泛用于快速临床决策。然而,与中心实验室方法相比,POCT用于评估钾(K⁺)和钠(Na⁺)等关键电解质的可靠性仍在受到审查。
本质量改进(QI)研究旨在通过将结果与中心实验室值进行比较,评估并提高POC静脉血气(VBG)检测K⁺和Na⁺的可靠性。该研究以计划-执行-研究-行动(PDSA)循环为框架,目标包括使用Pearson相关性和Bland-Altman方法量化分析一致性,识别系统偏差或临床异常值,并评估周转时间(TAT),以为急诊科内POCT方案整合的迭代改进提供信息。
对迪拜Fakeeh大学医院2023年3月至5月的120例患者(N = 120,100%)进行回顾性审计。比较了POCT VBG分析仪和实验室报告中的配对K⁺和Na⁺值。统计分析包括散点图、Pearson相关性和Bland-Altman一致性分析。
120例患者中,男性65例(54.2%),女性55例(45.8%),平均年龄47.3岁(标准差 = 16.1)。主要临床表现包括胸痛(N = 38,31.7%)、呼吸困难(N = 32,26.7%)、呕吐(N = 23,19.2%)和脱水体征(N = 27,22.5%)。POCT K⁺和Na⁺值与实验室值显示出强相关性(分别为r = 0.91和r = 0.88)。K⁺的平均偏差为+0.12 mmol/L,Na⁺的平均偏差为-1.2 mmol/L。POCT的TAT明显短于实验室结果(平均 = 2.4分钟对平均 = 12.3分钟),中位延迟为10分钟。
POCT在急诊科对K⁺和Na⁺评估显示出高可靠性。然而,在解释极端值时,尤其是高钾血症(> 5.5 mmol/L)时应谨慎。在临界或危急情况下应考虑中心实验室确认。