• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

“我虽不愿继续,但知道她可能会出现戒断反应”:对门诊环境中临床医生关于阿片类药物管理电子会诊请求的定性分析

"I Am Reluctant to Continue, Yet Know She Could Go into Withdrawal": A Qualitative Analysis of Clinician Requests for eConsults in Opioid Management in the Ambulatory Setting.

作者信息

Khalid Laila, Rikin Sharon, Watnick Dana, Lu Tiffany Y, Carrozzi Gianni, Valle Ana, Starrels Joanna L

机构信息

Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USA.

Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA.

出版信息

J Gen Intern Med. 2025 Sep 2. doi: 10.1007/s11606-025-09811-0.

DOI:10.1007/s11606-025-09811-0
PMID:40897972
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Electronic consultations (eConsults) allow clinicians to submit questions through the electronic health records (EHR) to request specialist input about individual patients' care, but there is paucity of literature describing eConsult programs specifically for opioid management.

OBJECTIVES

  1. To understand clinicians' reasons for seeking eConsults for opioid management. 2. To describe characteristics of clinicians' questions that can be addressed through eConsults without requiring in-person specialist visits.

DESIGN

Retrospective qualitative study of eConsults for opioid management in the ambulatory setting.

PARTICIPANTS

Clinicians who submitted an eConsult request for opioid management.

APPROACH

We conducted a qualitative content analysis of eConsult requests and responses. First, a priori codes were developed and applied to textual data. Through iterative discussion and memoing, thematic codes were identified and applied to the dataset. Subsequently, breadth and depth of codes were explored, collapsed, and redefined, and relationships between codes were discussed. Following theme development, matrix analysis was used to compare eConsults that resulted with or without a recommendation for an in-person specialist visit.

KEY RESULTS

Forty eConsults were requested by 30 unique referring clinicians mostly from general internal medicine (53%) or family medicine (27%). We identified four themes: (1) clinicians were motivated to reduce harm, (2) clinicians had difficulty labeling opioid misuse and use disorder (OUD), (3) clinicians had difficulty articulating discrete questions, and (4) clinician questions revealed knowledge gaps in opioid management. In-person specialist visits were recommended when clinicians needed help with labeling opioid misuse or OUD or when questions were vague and around complex topics.

CONCLUSION

Clinicians have unease and discomfort in treating chronic pain and managing opioids. eConsults are most helpful for low-complexity, discrete questions from clinicians focused on reducing harm. eConsult implementation should integrate EHR enhancements and clinician training in assessing opioid misuse and OUD and articulating discrete questions.

摘要

背景

电子会诊(eConsults)使临床医生能够通过电子健康记录(EHR)提交问题,以请求专科医生对个体患者的治疗提供意见,但专门描述用于阿片类药物管理的电子会诊项目的文献较少。

目的

  1. 了解临床医生寻求阿片类药物管理电子会诊的原因。2. 描述通过电子会诊可以解决而无需专科医生亲自出诊的临床医生问题的特征。

设计

对门诊环境中阿片类药物管理电子会诊的回顾性定性研究。

参与者

提交阿片类药物管理电子会诊请求的临床医生。

方法

我们对电子会诊请求和回复进行了定性内容分析。首先,制定先验编码并应用于文本数据。通过反复讨论和记录,确定主题编码并应用于数据集。随后,探讨、合并和重新定义编码的广度和深度,并讨论编码之间的关系。在主题开发之后,使用矩阵分析比较导致或未导致建议专科医生亲自出诊的电子会诊。

主要结果

30名不同的转诊临床医生共提交了40次电子会诊请求,这些临床医生大多来自普通内科(53%)或家庭医学(27%)。我们确定了四个主题:(1)临床医生有减少伤害的动机,(2)临床医生难以识别阿片类药物滥用和使用障碍(OUD),(3)临床医生难以清晰表达具体问题,(4)临床医生的问题揭示了阿片类药物管理方面的知识差距。当临床医生在识别阿片类药物滥用或OUD方面需要帮助,或者问题模糊且围绕复杂主题时,建议进行专科医生亲自出诊。

结论

临床医生在治疗慢性疼痛和管理阿片类药物方面存在不安和不适。电子会诊对临床医生提出的关注减少伤害的低复杂性、具体问题最有帮助。电子会诊的实施应整合电子健康记录的改进以及临床医生在评估阿片类药物滥用和OUD以及清晰表达具体问题方面的培训。

相似文献

1
"I Am Reluctant to Continue, Yet Know She Could Go into Withdrawal": A Qualitative Analysis of Clinician Requests for eConsults in Opioid Management in the Ambulatory Setting.“我虽不愿继续,但知道她可能会出现戒断反应”:对门诊环境中临床医生关于阿片类药物管理电子会诊请求的定性分析
J Gen Intern Med. 2025 Sep 2. doi: 10.1007/s11606-025-09811-0.
2
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
3
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
4
Can We Enhance Shared Decision-making for Periacetabular Osteotomy Surgery? A Qualitative Study of Patient Experiences.我们能否加强髋臼周围截骨术的共同决策?一项关于患者体验的定性研究。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Jan 1;483(1):120-136. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003198. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
5
Factors that influence participation in physical activity for people with bipolar disorder: a synthesis of qualitative evidence.影响双相障碍患者参与体育活动的因素:定性证据的综合分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Jun 4;6(6):CD013557. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013557.pub2.
6
A New Measure of Quantified Social Health Is Associated With Levels of Discomfort, Capability, and Mental and General Health Among Patients Seeking Musculoskeletal Specialty Care.一种新的量化社会健康指标与寻求肌肉骨骼专科护理的患者的不适程度、能力以及心理和总体健康水平相关。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Apr 1;483(4):647-663. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003394. Epub 2025 Feb 5.
7
How Do Individuals Perceive Diagnostic Labels and Explanations for Hip Pain? A Qualitative Study Among Adults With Persistent Hip Pain.个体如何看待髋关节疼痛的诊断标签和解释?一项针对持续性髋关节疼痛成年人的定性研究。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Mar 5. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003445.
8
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
9
Adapting Safety Plans for Autistic Adults with Involvement from the Autism Community.在自闭症群体的参与下为成年自闭症患者调整安全计划。
Autism Adulthood. 2025 May 28;7(3):293-302. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0124. eCollection 2025 Jun.
10
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.在基层医疗机构或医院门诊环境中,如果患者出现以下症状和体征,可判断其是否患有 COVID-19。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3.

本文引用的文献

1
CDC Clinical Practice Guideline for Prescribing Opioids for Pain - United States, 2022.美国疾病预防控制中心 2022 年《疼痛阿片类药物处方临床实践指南》。
MMWR Recomm Rep. 2022 Nov 4;71(3):1-95. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.rr7103a1.
2
Prescribing Opioids for Pain - The New CDC Clinical Practice Guideline.疼痛治疗中阿片类药物的处方——美国疾病控制与预防中心新临床实践指南
N Engl J Med. 2022 Dec 1;387(22):2011-2013. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp2211040. Epub 2022 Nov 3.
3
The Use of Electronic Consultations in Outpatient Surgery Clinics: Synthesized Narrative Review.
门诊手术诊所中电子会诊的应用:综合叙述性综述
JMIR Perioper Med. 2022 Apr 14;5(1):e34661. doi: 10.2196/34661.
4
Identifying Content Themes in Primary Care Physician and Rheumatologist Communications Within Electronic Consultations: A Qualitative Study.识别电子会诊中初级保健医生和风湿病学家沟通中的内容主题:一项定性研究。
ACR Open Rheumatol. 2021 Oct;3(10):715-722. doi: 10.1002/acr2.11317. Epub 2021 Aug 7.
5
Clinical Effectiveness of an Outpatient Multidisciplinary Chronic Pain Management Telementoring Service.门诊多学科慢性疼痛管理远程指导服务的临床效果。
Clin J Pain. 2021 Oct 1;37(10):740-746. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000967.
6
Characterizing Patients after Opioid Taper in a VA Medical Center.在退伍军人医疗中心对阿片类药物减量后的患者进行特征描述。
J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother. 2021 Jun;35(2):84-90. doi: 10.1080/15360288.2021.1900492. Epub 2021 May 6.
7
Impact of an Opt-In eConsult Program on Primary Care Demand for Specialty Visits: Stepped-Wedge Cluster Randomized Implementation Study.电子咨询计划对初级保健专科就诊需求的影响:逐步楔形集群随机实施研究。
J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Nov;35(Suppl 2):832-838. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-06101-9. Epub 2020 Aug 10.
8
Utility, Appropriateness, and Content of Electronic Consultations Across Medical Subspecialties.电子咨询在医学亚专科中的实用性、适宜性和内容。
Ann Intern Med. 2020 May 19;172(10):641-647. doi: 10.7326/M19-3852. Epub 2020 Apr 14.
9
Improving Residency Education on Chronic Pain and Opioid Use Disorder: Evaluation of CDC Guideline-Based Education.改善慢性疼痛和阿片类药物使用障碍的住院医师教育:基于 CDC 指南的教育评估。
Subst Use Misuse. 2020;55(4):684-690. doi: 10.1080/10826084.2019.1691600. Epub 2019 Nov 22.
10
Electronic consultations (E-consults) and their outcomes: a systematic review.电子咨询(E-consults)及其结果:系统评价。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2020 Mar 1;27(3):471-479. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocz185.