David Ellie, Plantady Clarisse, Poissonnier Sophiane, Elliott Josie F K, Kenck Elodie, Le Boulch Justine, Gutierrez Arnaud, Chevallereau Anne
Université Paris Cité, CNRS, INSERM, Institut Cochin, 75014 Paris, France.
Phaxiam Therapeutics, 60 Avenue Rockefeller, Bâtiment Bioserra, 69008 Lyon, France.
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2025 Sep 4;380(1934):20240067. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2024.0067.
Bacterial resistance to bacteriophages (phages) relies on two primary strategies: preventing phage attachment and blocking post-attachment steps. These post-attachment mechanisms are mediated by diverse defence systems, including DNA-degrading systems such as restriction-modification and CRISPR-Cas, along with abortive infection systems that induce cell death or dormancy. Computational analyses suggest that bacterial genomes encode multiple defence systems, which may act synergistically to enhance phage resistance. However, the regulation, interactions and ecological roles of these systems in native hosts remain poorly understood. This study explored the role of eight predicted defence systems in the clinical isolate NILS69 of by testing its susceptibility to 93 phages. Infectivity and adsorption assays using mutants defective in these systems revealed that only PD-T4-3 and restriction-modification systems restricted phages that were able to adsorb. The restriction-modification system acted via a predicted type IV endonuclease and was also able to limit plasmid conjugation if the plasmid was transferred from a donor strain lacking a methylase, which is the hallmark of type I, II or III restriction-modification systems. Other defence systems showed no detectable activity, likely owing to phage specificity, environmental regulation or cofactor requirements. These findings underscore the need for further studies to investigate the regulation and ecological roles of bacterial defence systems in their native host contexts.This article is part of the discussion meeting issue 'The ecology and evolution of bacterial immune systems'.
阻止噬菌体附着和阻断附着后的步骤。这些附着后机制由多种防御系统介导,包括DNA降解系统,如限制修饰系统和CRISPR-Cas系统,以及诱导细胞死亡或休眠的流产感染系统。计算分析表明,细菌基因组编码多种防御系统,这些系统可能协同作用以增强噬菌体抗性。然而,这些系统在天然宿主中的调控、相互作用和生态作用仍知之甚少。本研究通过测试临床分离株NILS69对93种噬菌体的敏感性,探索了8种预测的防御系统的作用。使用这些系统有缺陷的突变体进行的感染性和吸附试验表明,只有PD-T4-3和限制修饰系统限制了能够吸附的噬菌体。限制修饰系统通过一种预测的IV型核酸内切酶起作用,并且如果质粒是从缺乏甲基化酶的供体菌株转移而来,它也能够限制质粒的接合,这是I型、II型或III型限制修饰系统的标志。其他防御系统未显示出可检测到的活性,可能是由于噬菌体特异性、环境调控或辅因子需求。这些发现强调了需要进一步研究以调查细菌防御系统在其天然宿主环境中的调控和生态作用。本文是“细菌免疫系统的生态学和进化”讨论会议题的一部分。