Robb T A, Goodwin D A, Davidson G P
Acta Paediatr Scand. 1985 Nov;74(6):942-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.1985.tb10061.x.
In the assessment of carbohydrate malabsorption, it is important to determine if a flat breath hydrogen test is a false negative result. Currently, the only reliable way to do this is with a lactulose test. We determined the reliability of assessing faecal hydrogen production as an indicator of an adequate in vivo hydrogen producing colonic bacterial flora. Unfortunately, the results clearly show that the incidence of falsely positive and negative faecal hydrogen production, when compared with in vivo lactulose testing, is so high that the simple faeces screening test is unsuitable for routine use. Until a simpler alternative is found, centres using the breath hydrogen test to determine carbohydrate malabsorption must continue to rely on lactulose breath testing when it is necessary to exclude potential false negative results.
在评估碳水化合物吸收不良时,确定呼气氢试验是否为假阴性结果很重要。目前,唯一可靠的方法是进行乳果糖试验。我们测定了评估粪便产氢量作为体内产氢结肠菌群充足指标的可靠性。不幸的是,结果清楚地表明,与体内乳果糖试验相比,粪便产氢量假阳性和假阴性的发生率很高,以至于简单的粪便筛查试验不适用于常规使用。在找到更简单的替代方法之前,使用呼气氢试验来确定碳水化合物吸收不良的中心在需要排除潜在假阴性结果时,必须继续依赖乳果糖呼气试验。