Che-Mendoza Azael, Guillermo-May Guillermo, Kirstein Oscar D, Chi-Ku Aylin, Pavía-Ruz Norma, Medina-Barreiro Anuar, González-Olvera Gabriela, Devine Gregor, Vazquez-Prokopec Gonzalo, Manrique-Saide Pablo
Unidad Colaborativa para Bioensayos Entomologicos, Universidad Autonoma de Yucatan, Merida, Mexico.
Department of Environmental Sciences, Emory University, Atlanta, GeorgiaUnited States of America.
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2025 Sep 5;19(9):e0012883. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0012883. eCollection 2025 Sep.
Spatial emanators (SE) are innovative tools for controlling indoor Aedes aegypti due to their relatively easy use and high efficacy. Large-scale implementation challenges include community adoption, particularly ensuring proper installation and timely replacement as SE efficacy wanes.
We conducted a three-arm, open-label entomological cluster randomized controlled trial with a crossover design, involving 588 households, to assess the entomological effect of the community use of metofluthrin emanators. Arms were: "no treatment"; "community-led deployment" (CD), where the households were responsible for installing and replacing SE with minimal guidance; and "managed deployment" (MD), where the research team handled SE installation and replacement. Emanators were replaced every 3 weeks across four deployment cycles, followed by a crossover between the CD and MD arms. Indoor resting mosquitoes were collected using Prokopack aspirators, and human landing counts (HLCs) were conducted in a subset of 12 houses (4 by arm) at the first, fourth, fifth, and eighth SE replacement rounds. Values of each endpoint during all sampling periods were compared using generalized linear mixed effects models (GLMM), the coefficients of the best-fitting model estimated that SE intervention reduced the number of Ae. aegypti per house by 32.7% (95%CI = 16.2-46.0%) in the CD arm and 36.8% (21.1-49.3%) in the MD arm. HLCs accounted 74-94% efficacy (MD) and 35-79% (CD). The crossover analysis found no significant difference between periods and arms, demonstrating the community's ability to manage SE as effectively as research team, even without prior training.
CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: This trial suggests that safe, portable SE are suited to deployment by householders as a rapid response to local Aedes-borne disease outbreaks even in the presence of high pyrethroid resistance in the local Aedes population. In urban areas where effective coverage and resourcing is a challenge to control campaigns, community "ownership" of SE products may enhance the impact of insecticidal interventions.
空间散发器(SE)是控制室内埃及伊蚊的创新工具,因其使用相对简便且效果显著。大规模实施面临的挑战包括社区接受度,特别是要确保正确安装以及随着SE效果减弱及时进行更换。
我们开展了一项采用交叉设计的三臂、开放标签的昆虫学整群随机对照试验,涉及588户家庭,以评估社区使用甲氧氟氯菊酯散发器的昆虫学效果。分组情况为:“不进行处理”;“社区主导部署”(CD),即住户在最少指导下负责安装和更换SE;以及“管理式部署”(MD),即由研究团队负责SE的安装和更换。在四个部署周期中,每隔3周更换一次散发器,之后CD组和MD组进行交叉。使用Prokopack吸气器收集室内栖息的蚊子,并在第1、4、5和8次更换SE时,在12所房屋的一个子集中(每组4所)进行人体诱蚊叮咬计数(HLC)。使用广义线性混合效应模型(GLMM)比较所有采样期内每个终点的值,最佳拟合模型的系数估计,SE干预使CD组每户埃及伊蚊数量减少了32.7%(95%CI = 16.2 - 46.0%),MD组减少了36.8%(21.1 - 49.3%)。HLC显示MD组的效果为74 - 9%,CD组为35 - 79%。交叉分析发现各时期和组间无显著差异,表明即使没有事先培训,社区管理SE的能力与研究团队一样有效。
结论/意义:该试验表明,即使当地埃及伊蚊种群对拟除虫菊酯具有高抗性,安全、便携的SE也适合由住户进行部署,作为对当地埃及伊蚊传播疾病爆发的快速应对措施。在城市地区,有效覆盖和资源配置对防控行动构成挑战,SE产品的社区“所有权”可能会增强杀虫干预措施的效果。