Xu Junwei, Wang Qiankun, Marchibayeva Ulbossyn, Bolat Nurdybek, Sagidolla Mukhametkali, Kalym Yelshat, Aidarkhan Kairat, Alam Jan, Zhalel Ali
Physical Education Institute, Henan University of Economics and Law, Zhengzhou, China.
Department of Physical Education and Sports, L.N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University, Astana, Kazakhstan.
Front Sports Act Living. 2025 Aug 21;7:1566717. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2025.1566717. eCollection 2025.
In order to accurately identify the diagnostic index system that can best reflect the technical and tactical performance of table tennis after the implementation of the new ABS material ball, and then more accurately and efficiently diagnose and analyze the technical and tactical ability of players. This paper uses the methods of match observation, mathematical statistics, literature and other methods to carry out an empirical comparative study on the representative segmented diagnostic indicator system constructed by predecessors in the past 20 years. Research suggests that: 1) in the New Ball Era, each segmented diagnostic indicator system has a certain degree of rationality, but in comparison, the five-segment diagnostic indicator system is the most optimal and the most accurate to reveal the technical and tactical performance in the new era. 2) The five segments consist of the serving-attacking segment, receiving-attacking segment, serving-attacking connection segment, receiving-attacking connection segment, and the sustaining segment. 3) The impact of these five segments on the outcome of the match is as follows: The "attacking" segments have the greatest impact on the match outcome, followed by the "connecting" segments, and the "sustaining" segment has the smallest impact. The impact of the receiving and attacking segment on the outcome of the match is higher than that of the serving and attacking segment, and the impact of the serving and attacking connection segment on the outcome of the match is higher than that of the receiving and attacking connection segment. 4) In the New Ball Era, the fifth and sixth strokes of the "connecting" segment have gained prominence, playing a pivotal role for transitioning between offense and defense in the "attacking" segment and the "sustaining" segment. These findings highlight the need for coaches and analysts to adopt the five-segment diagnostic indicator system as a more accurate framework for evaluating performance. Emphasizing training in the receiving-attacking and connecting phases-especially the fifth and sixth strokes, can provide a competitive edge under the dynamics of the New Ball Era. This refined understanding can guide more targeted technical and tactical preparation, better aligning training priorities with the actual determinants of match outcomes.
为了准确识别在新的ABS材质球实施后，能够最佳反映乒乓球技术和战术表现的诊断指标体系，进而更准确、高效地诊断和分析运动员的技术战术能力。本文运用比赛观察、数理统计、文献资料等方法，对前人在过去20年构建的代表性分段诊断指标体系进行实证比较研究。研究表明：1）在新球时代，各分段诊断指标体系都具有一定的合理性，但相比之下，五分段诊断指标体系最为优化，最能准确揭示新时代的技术战术表现。2）这五个分段分别为发球进攻段、接发球进攻段、发球进攻衔接段、接发球进攻衔接段和相持段。3）这五个分段对比赛结果的影响如下：“进攻”段对比赛结果的影响最大，其次是“衔接”段，“相持”段影响最小。接发球进攻段对比赛结果的影响高于发球进攻段，发球进攻衔接段对比赛结果的影响高于接发球进攻衔接段。4）在新球时代，“衔接”段的第五、第六板球作用凸显，在“进攻”段和“相持”段的攻防转换中发挥着关键作用。这些研究结果凸显了教练和分析人员采用五分段诊断指标体系作为评估表现的更准确框架的必要性。强调接发球进攻和衔接阶段的训练——尤其是第五、第六板球，可以在新球时代的动态环境下提供竞争优势。这种更精确的理解可以指导更有针对性的技术战术准备，使训练重点更好地与比赛结果的实际决定因素相匹配。
