• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

桶柄状内侧半月板撕裂初次修复28年后因复发性半月板不稳需翻修修复:一例报告

Recurrent Meniscal Instability Requiring Revision Repair 28 Years After the Initial Repair for a Bucket Handle Medial Meniscus Tear: A Case Report.

作者信息

Onishi Shintaro, Iseki Tomoya, Kanto Ryo, Nakayama Hiroshi, Yamaguchi Motoi, Tachibana Toshiya, Yoshiya Shinichi

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Nishinomiya Kaisei Hospital, Nishinomiya, Hyogo, Japan.

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hyogo Medical University, Nishinomiya, Hyogo, Japan.

出版信息

Case Rep Orthop. 2025 Aug 29;2025:7395591. doi: 10.1155/cro/7395591. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.1155/cro/7395591
PMID:40919230
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12413269/
Abstract

In recent decades, arthroscopic meniscal repair has been increasingly indicated for meniscal tears in the last decades. Although literature generally reports favorable surgical outcomes, it remains unclear whether the repaired meniscus maintains its function over the long term while performing its chondroprotective function without recurrent tear after clinical healing. A 43-year-old Japanese man who underwent meniscal repair for a bucket handle tear of the medial meniscus (MM) at the age of 15 years presented with right knee pain and catching symptoms without a preceding traumatic event. Physical examination revealed joint line tenderness and a catching sensation with rotating motion in the medial aspect of the knee. Plain radiographs showed no apparent osteoarthritic changes. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed infiltration of joint fluid at the interface between the MM and the joint capsule. Based on the patient's history and the examination results, a retear of the MM was diagnosed, and revision MM repair was conducted using the inside-out technique. At the 2-year follow-up, the patient remained asymptomatic, physical examination revealed no meniscal symptoms, and radiological examination showed no signs of osteoarthritic progression. The present study details a case involving a retear of a repaired meniscus without an inciting traumatic event after a 28-year asymptomatic period is reported. The long-term results of meniscus repair surgery performed more than 20 years ago have rarely been reported in the literature. This case report indicates that the long-term preservation of articular cartilage following successful meniscal repair can be attributed to the maintenance of meniscal function. On the other hand, even after clinical healing has been achieved, there is a possibility that the risk of meniscal retear will continue over time.

摘要

近几十年来,关节镜下半月板修复术越来越多地用于治疗半月板撕裂。尽管文献普遍报道手术效果良好,但尚不清楚修复后的半月板在长期内是否能维持其功能,同时在临床愈合后发挥软骨保护作用且不复发撕裂。一名43岁的日本男性,15岁时因内侧半月板(MM)桶柄状撕裂接受了半月板修复术,此次无先前创伤事件却出现右膝疼痛和卡顿症状。体格检查发现关节线压痛,膝关节内侧旋转运动时有卡顿感。X线平片未显示明显的骨关节炎改变。磁共振成像(MRI)显示MM与关节囊界面处有关节液浸润。根据患者病史和检查结果,诊断为MM再次撕裂,并采用由内向外技术进行了MM翻修修复术。在2年随访时,患者无症状,体格检查未发现半月板症状,影像学检查也未显示骨关节炎进展迹象。本研究详细报道了一例在28年无症状期后出现无激发性创伤事件的修复半月板再次撕裂的病例。文献中很少报道20多年前进行的半月板修复手术的长期结果。本病例报告表明,半月板修复成功后关节软骨的长期保存可归因于半月板功能的维持。另一方面,即使已经实现临床愈合,随着时间的推移半月板再次撕裂的风险仍有可能持续存在。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0180/12413269/f71e7c51ff8f/CRIOR2025-7395591.005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0180/12413269/ea42a7a7cd47/CRIOR2025-7395591.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0180/12413269/e2e796721759/CRIOR2025-7395591.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0180/12413269/293e988de1e1/CRIOR2025-7395591.003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0180/12413269/5ae030bcbf0d/CRIOR2025-7395591.004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0180/12413269/f71e7c51ff8f/CRIOR2025-7395591.005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0180/12413269/ea42a7a7cd47/CRIOR2025-7395591.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0180/12413269/e2e796721759/CRIOR2025-7395591.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0180/12413269/293e988de1e1/CRIOR2025-7395591.003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0180/12413269/5ae030bcbf0d/CRIOR2025-7395591.004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0180/12413269/f71e7c51ff8f/CRIOR2025-7395591.005.jpg

相似文献

1
Recurrent Meniscal Instability Requiring Revision Repair 28 Years After the Initial Repair for a Bucket Handle Medial Meniscus Tear: A Case Report.桶柄状内侧半月板撕裂初次修复28年后因复发性半月板不稳需翻修修复:一例报告
Case Rep Orthop. 2025 Aug 29;2025:7395591. doi: 10.1155/cro/7395591. eCollection 2025.
2
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
3
Medial Meniscal Extrusion Increased on 6-Month Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Despite Successful Posterior Root Repair With or Without a Centralization Suture: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.内侧半月板挤出在6个月时磁共振成像显示增加,尽管后根部修复成功(无论是否使用中心化缝线):一项随机对照临床试验。
Am J Sports Med. 2025 Sep 3:3635465251366443. doi: 10.1177/03635465251366443.
4
Anterior Approach Total Ankle Arthroplasty with Patient-Specific Cut Guides.使用患者特异性截骨导向器的前路全踝关节置换术。
JBJS Essent Surg Tech. 2025 Aug 15;15(3). doi: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.23.00027. eCollection 2025 Jul-Sep.
5
Nineteen percent of meniscus repairs are being revised and failures frequently occur after the second postoperative year: a systematic review and meta-analysis with a minimum follow-up of 5 years.19%的半月板修复术需要翻修,且术后第二年常出现失败:一项至少随访 5 年的系统回顾和荟萃分析。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2022 Jul;30(7):2267-2276. doi: 10.1007/s00167-021-06770-x. Epub 2021 Oct 20.
6
In elite athletes with meniscal injuries, always repair the lateral, think about the medial! A systematic review.在半月板损伤的精英运动员中,始终修复外侧半月板,考虑内侧半月板!系统评价。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2023 Jun;31(6):2500-2510. doi: 10.1007/s00167-022-07208-8. Epub 2022 Nov 2.
7
Inside-Out Repair Technique Results in Less Medial Meniscal Extrusion Than All-Inside Repair Technique for Complete Radial Tears of the Medial Meniscus Posterior Segment: A Cadaveric Study.对于内侧半月板后段完全放射状撕裂,由内向外修复技术比全内修复技术导致的内侧半月板挤出更少:一项尸体研究。
Orthop J Sports Med. 2025 Aug 20;13(8):23259671251356695. doi: 10.1177/23259671251356695. eCollection 2025 Aug.
8
High failure rate in meniscal repair when preceding anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: An analysis of two-stage surgery for concomitant ACL injury and traumatic meniscus tear.前交叉韧带重建术前进行半月板修复时失败率较高:对伴有前交叉韧带损伤和创伤性半月板撕裂的两阶段手术的分析。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2025 Jul;33(7):2323-2333. doi: 10.1002/ksa.12593. Epub 2025 Jan 29.
9
Arthroscopic meniscal posterior root repair combined with centralization reduces medial menicus extrusion associated with posterior root tears: One-year clinical outcomes.关节镜下半月板后根修复联合半月板复位术可减少与后根撕裂相关的内侧半月板挤压:一年临床结果
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2024 Nov 14. doi: 10.1002/ksa.12533.
10
The 'Floating Medial Meniscus' Lesion in KD3M Knee Dislocations.KD3M型膝关节脱位中的“浮动内侧半月板”损伤
Indian J Orthop. 2024 Dec 31;59(4):494-500. doi: 10.1007/s43465-024-01320-2. eCollection 2025 Apr.

本文引用的文献

1
Isolated meniscus injuries in skeletally immature children and adolescents: state of the art.骨骼未成熟儿童和青少年的孤立性半月板损伤:最新进展
J ISAKOS. 2022 Feb;7(1):19-26. doi: 10.1136/jisakos-2020-000496. Epub 2022 Jan 11.
2
Outcomes and failure rates after revision meniscal repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis.翻修后半月板修复的结果和失败率:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int Orthop. 2022 Jul;46(7):1557-1562. doi: 10.1007/s00264-022-05413-1. Epub 2022 Apr 27.
3
Long-term follow-up of bucket-handle meniscal repairs: chondroprotective effect outweighs high failure risk.
桶柄状半月板修复的长期随访:软骨保护作用大于高失败风险。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2022 Jul;30(7):2209-2214. doi: 10.1007/s00167-021-06787-2. Epub 2021 Nov 6.
4
Nineteen percent of meniscus repairs are being revised and failures frequently occur after the second postoperative year: a systematic review and meta-analysis with a minimum follow-up of 5 years.19%的半月板修复术需要翻修,且术后第二年常出现失败:一项至少随访 5 年的系统回顾和荟萃分析。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2022 Jul;30(7):2267-2276. doi: 10.1007/s00167-021-06770-x. Epub 2021 Oct 20.
5
What Is the Failure Rate After Arthroscopic Repair of Bucket-Handle Meniscal Tears? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.桶柄状半月板撕裂关节镜修复术后的失败率是多少?一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Am J Sports Med. 2022 May;50(6):1742-1752. doi: 10.1177/03635465211015425. Epub 2021 Jun 23.
6
A systematic review about long-term results after meniscus repair.关于半月板修复后长期结果的系统评价。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2022 May;142(5):835-844. doi: 10.1007/s00402-021-03906-z. Epub 2021 Apr 28.
7
All-Inside Repair of Bucket-Handle Meniscal Tears: Clinical Outcomes and Prognostic Factors.全内修复桶柄状半月板撕裂:临床结果和预后因素。
Am J Sports Med. 2020 Nov;48(13):3386-3393. doi: 10.1177/0363546520906141. Epub 2020 Mar 20.
8
Meniscal Repair in Pediatric Populations: A Systematic Review of Outcomes.儿童人群的半月板修复:结局的系统评价
Orthop J Sports Med. 2019 May 13;7(5):2325967119843355. doi: 10.1177/2325967119843355. eCollection 2019 May.
9
Long-term Results After Repair of Isolated Meniscal Tears Among Patients Aged 18 Years and Younger: An 18-Year Follow-up Study.18 岁及以下患者孤立性半月板撕裂修复的长期结果:18 年随访研究。
Am J Sports Med. 2019 Mar;47(4):799-806. doi: 10.1177/0363546519826088. Epub 2019 Feb 25.
10
Isolated revision meniscal repair - failure rates, clinical outcome, and patient satisfaction.孤立性半月板修复翻修术——失败率、临床结果及患者满意度
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2018 Dec 21;19(1):446. doi: 10.1186/s12891-018-2368-0.