Crook Carmel R, Sandell Tiffany E, Taylor Emma V, Thompson Sandra C
The Sax Institute, 30C Wentworth Street Glebe, New South Wales, 2037, Australia.
School of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, University Drive, Callaghan, New South Wales, 2380, Australia.
Lancet Reg Health West Pac. 2025 Jun 29;61:101552. doi: 10.1016/j.lanwpc.2025.101552. eCollection 2025 Aug.
Poorer cancer prevention and control outcomes for First Nations Australians have resulted in a need for improved health literacy, that is their capacity as individuals to access, understand, and use information in ways that promote and maintain good health. This narrative review explores the evidence on how education programs work to improve First Nations Australians' understanding of cancer, and how this leads to more effective use of prevention, screening and treatment services. Limited to the Australian context, a bibliographic search using terms structured around four main concepts: Aboriginal, Cancer, Australia, and Intervention (health literacy, health promotion) was undertaken in May 2024 for publications from January 2000. Studies that evaluated interventions or initiatives aimed to educate (that is, to increase awareness, knowledge and influence behaviours) across the cancer journey (excluding palliative care) were included. Fourteen evaluated initiatives drawn from peer-reviewed papers, published reports and peak body case studies were included in the review. All included papers were assessed with three major areas considered important for determining the effectiveness of cancer education for First Nations Australians: 1) acceptability: delivery in a format that is acceptable to community and health services, 2) impact: having a positive impact on people's access to and understanding of the cancer pathway and/or increases intended or actual participation, and 3) viability: successfully navigating the challenges of viably implementing, sustaining and scaling up an initiative. This review highlights several factors that contribute to the effectiveness of cancer education initiatives targeting First Nations Australians: culturally tailored initiatives, co-design and consultation during development, capacity building to create supportive, trusting environments for accessible cancer education; local ownership and empowerment, integration with existing healthcare systems, flexibility and multi-pronged approaches. Challenges and areas for further efforts in developing cancer health literacy are also described. Relatively few initiatives are evaluated: most of these have focussed on screening and treatment.
澳大利亚原住民在癌症预防和控制方面的成效较差,因此需要提高健康素养,即个人获取、理解和运用信息以促进和维持健康的能力。本叙述性综述探讨了教育项目如何提高澳大利亚原住民对癌症的理解,以及这如何导致更有效地利用预防、筛查和治疗服务。限于澳大利亚的背景,2024年5月进行了一次文献检索,使用围绕四个主要概念构建的术语:原住民、癌症、澳大利亚和干预(健康素养、健康促进),检索2000年1月以来的出版物。纳入了评估旨在在癌症全程(不包括姑息治疗)进行教育(即提高意识、知识和影响行为)的干预措施或倡议的研究。综述纳入了从同行评审论文、已发表报告和行业顶尖机构案例研究中提取的14项经过评估的倡议。所有纳入的论文都在三个主要领域进行了评估,这些领域被认为对确定澳大利亚原住民癌症教育的有效性很重要:1)可接受性:以社区和卫生服务可接受的形式提供;2)影响:对人们获取和理解癌症路径产生积极影响,和/或增加预期或实际参与度;3)可行性:成功应对可行实施、维持和扩大一项倡议所面临的挑战。本综述强调了有助于针对澳大利亚原住民的癌症教育倡议有效性的几个因素:文化定制倡议、开发过程中的共同设计和协商、能力建设以创建支持性、信任性的可及癌症教育环境;地方所有权和赋权、与现有医疗系统整合、灵活性和多管齐下的方法。还描述了在发展癌症健康素养方面的挑战和进一步努力的领域。评估的倡议相对较少:其中大多数集中在筛查和治疗方面。