Soeno Tatsuya, Sato Takashi, Kobayashi Koichi, Katsumi Ryota, Otani Kazutaka, Kawashima Hiroyuki
Division of Orthopedic Surgery, Department of Regenerative and Transplant Medicine, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Science, Niigata, Japan.
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Niigata Medical Center, Niigata, Japan.
JB JS Open Access. 2025 Sep 8;10(3). doi: 10.2106/JBJS.OA.25.00168. eCollection 2025 Jul-Sep.
Lower extremity alignment in knee osteoarthritis (OA) is conventionally assessed using standing radiographs. However, symptoms often manifest during gait. Understanding dynamic alignment during gait may help characterize disease progression and inform treatment strategies.
Twenty patients (40 knees) with advanced medial knee OA scheduled for arthroplasty were analyzed. Lower extremity alignment in standing (LEA-Standing) and during the midstance phase of gait (LEA-Gait) was evaluated using 3D-2D image matching technique with a ground-referenced and gravity-referenced coordinate system. Alignment parameters included femoral and tibial inclinations (coronal and sagittal), rotation angles, hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA), and tibial joint line angle (TJLA). Parameters were compared between gait and standing. ΔLEA (gait minus standing) was analyzed in relation with patient background and standing alignment. Medial joint space closure was evaluated on static radiographs and during gait.
LEA-Gait showed greater lateral inclination of the tibia and TJLA compared with standing, which resulted in increased varus HKA (all p < 0.01). No significant differences were observed in femoral or tibial rotation. Greater ΔTMA (tibial mechanical axis) and ΔTJLA were observed in knees with milder malalignment in standing. Medial joint space appeared open in 13 knees on standing and 5 on Rosenberg views but was closed in all 40 knees during gait.
LEA-Gait differed significantly from LEA-Standing, revealing medial joint space closure and alignment abnormalities not captured by static evaluations including standing radiographs and Rosenberg views. These findings highlight the importance of considering the possibility of cartilage wear that may not be apparent on static radiographs.
Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
膝关节骨关节炎(OA)的下肢对线通常通过站立位X线片进行评估。然而,症状往往在步态中表现出来。了解步态中的动态对线情况可能有助于描述疾病进展并为治疗策略提供依据。
对20例计划进行关节置换术的晚期膝关节内侧OA患者(40个膝关节)进行分析。采用基于地面参考和重力参考坐标系的3D-2D图像匹配技术评估站立位(LEA-Standing)和步态中期(LEA-Gait)的下肢对线情况。对线参数包括股骨和胫骨的倾斜度(冠状面和矢状面)、旋转角度、髋-膝-踝角(HKA)和胫骨关节线角(TJLA)。比较步态和站立位之间的参数。分析ΔLEA(步态减去站立位)与患者背景和站立位对线的关系。在静态X线片和步态中评估内侧关节间隙闭合情况。
与站立位相比,LEA-Gait显示胫骨的外侧倾斜度和TJLA更大,导致内翻HKA增加(所有p<0.01)。股骨或胫骨旋转未见显著差异。在站立位对线畸形较轻的膝关节中观察到更大的ΔTMA(胫骨机械轴)和ΔTJLA。站立位时13个膝关节的内侧关节间隙在站立位X线片上显示开放,5个在Rosenberg位片上显示开放,但在步态中所有40个膝关节的内侧关节间隙均闭合。
LEA-Gait与LEA-Standing有显著差异,揭示了静态评估(包括站立位X线片和Rosenberg位片)未捕捉到的内侧关节间隙闭合和对线异常。这些发现强调了考虑静态X线片上可能不明显的软骨磨损可能性的重要性。
II级。有关证据水平的完整描述,请参阅作者指南。