Aguirre Siliezar Kimberly, Patel Sonny, Chande Reema, Joiner Alaina, Hoover MacKenzie C, Mathis Mary W, Hendrickson Janet, Siliezar Julio, Jankowski Kristin
University of California Davis School of Veterinary Medicine, Davis, CA, USA.
Mercer University School of Medicine, Macon, GA, USA.
J Prim Care Community Health. 2025 Jan-Dec;16:21501319251369270. doi: 10.1177/21501319251369270. Epub 2025 Sep 9.
INTRODUCTION/OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this descriptive study was to strengthen understanding of the human-animal bond and the impact of One Health Clinics (OHCs) on the communities they serve. We aimed to assess how joint access to veterinary care and human health services enables community members to engage with healthcare for themselves.
Individuals attending 2 OHCs in the United States were surveyed to gain insight into reasons for attending OHCs, attitudes on the human-animal bond, healthcare access and utilization, and pet owner satisfaction and trust toward medical and veterinary professionals. Both clinics operated in areas with limited medical and veterinary healthcare access, but varied in clinic structure and availability of human healthcare volunteers.
A total of 175 surveys were analyzed. Most participants attended primarily for veterinary services (Clinic A: 91%, Clinic B: 75%). However, a significantly higher proportion of Clinic B participants received health screenings (91% vs 32%, < .0001), learned new health information (48% vs 31%, = .0129), and were provided with follow-up health resources (84% vs 51%, = .000007). Across both sites, the majority expressed high trust in medical and veterinary providers (Clinic A: 84%-95%, Clinic B: 90%-98%) and reported high satisfaction with the care received. Most participants considered their pets vital family members (Clinic A: 81%, Clinic B: 93%), and many credited their pets with supporting physical activity and reducing feelings of depression and loneliness. Importantly, a majority of respondents at both clinics indicated they were more likely to seek healthcare for themselves if veterinary services were also available (Clinic A: 56%, Clinic B: 72%).
These findings suggest that OHCs have the potential to enhance access to human healthcare in underserved communities by utilizing veterinary services as a point of engagement. Participants reported a strong bond with their pet. Based on reported levels of trust and satisfaction, the OHC model may help strengthen relationships between underserved communities and human healthcare and veterinary professionals.
引言/目标:本描述性研究的目的是加强对人宠关系以及“同一健康诊所”(OHC)对其所服务社区的影响的理解。我们旨在评估联合提供兽医护理和人类健康服务如何使社区成员参与自身的医疗保健。
对在美国两家OHC就诊的个体进行了调查,以深入了解就诊OHC的原因、对人宠关系的态度、医疗保健的获取与利用情况,以及宠物主人对医疗和兽医专业人员的满意度与信任度。两家诊所均位于医疗和兽医保健服务获取有限的地区,但诊所结构以及人类医疗保健志愿者的可获得性有所不同。
共分析了175份调查问卷。大多数参与者主要是为了兽医服务而来就诊(诊所A:91%,诊所B:75%)。然而,诊所B的参与者接受健康筛查的比例显著更高(91%对32%,<0.0001),了解到新的健康信息的比例更高(48%对31%,=0.0129),并且获得后续健康资源的比例更高(84%对51%,=0.000007)。在两个地点,大多数人对医疗和兽医服务提供者表示高度信任(诊所A:84% - 95%,诊所B:90% - 98%),并对所接受的护理表示高度满意。大多数参与者认为他们的宠物是至关重要的家庭成员(诊所A:81%,诊所B:93%),许多人认为他们的宠物有助于进行体育活动,并减少抑郁和孤独感。重要的是,两家诊所的大多数受访者表示,如果也能获得兽医服务,他们自己更有可能寻求医疗保健(诊所A:56%,诊所B:72%)。
这些发现表明,OHC有潜力通过将兽医服务作为切入点,在服务不足的社区中增加人类医疗保健的可及性。参与者报告称与他们的宠物关系密切。基于所报告的信任和满意度水平,OHC模式可能有助于加强服务不足社区与人类医疗保健及兽医专业人员之间的关系。