• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Bifactor Modeling of the Social Interaction Anxiety Scale-6 and the Social Phobia Scale-6 in a Korean Community Sample.韩国社区样本中社交互动焦虑量表-6和社交恐惧症量表-6的双因素模型
Alpha Psychiatry. 2025 Aug 28;26(4):46107. doi: 10.31083/AP46107. eCollection 2025 Aug.
2
Sex differences in seizure effects on social anxiety in persons with epilepsy.癫痫发作对癫痫患者社交焦虑影响中的性别差异。
Epilepsy Behav. 2021 Sep 21;124:108318. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2021.108318.
3
A New Measure of Quantified Social Health Is Associated With Levels of Discomfort, Capability, and Mental and General Health Among Patients Seeking Musculoskeletal Specialty Care.一种新的量化社会健康指标与寻求肌肉骨骼专科护理的患者的不适程度、能力以及心理和总体健康水平相关。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Apr 1;483(4):647-663. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003394. Epub 2025 Feb 5.
4
Investigation and analysis of mental health status of the older adult in western rural areas.西部农村地区老年人心理健康状况的调查与分析
Front Public Health. 2025 Jul 16;13:1612600. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1612600. eCollection 2025.
5
A Bifactor-ESEM Representation of the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support.感知社会支持多维量表的双因素-扩展结构方程模型表示
Psychol Rep. 2023 Oct 20:332941231206992. doi: 10.1177/00332941231206992.
6
Psychometric properties of the brief fear of negative evaluation scale-Straightforward items.简短负性评价恐惧量表-直接项目的心理测量学特性
Front Psychol. 2025 Jun 13;16:1572752. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1572752. eCollection 2025.
7
Factor structure of the Social Phobia Scale (SPS) and the Social Interaction Anxiety Scale (SIAS) in a clinical sample recruited from the community.从社区招募的临床样本中社会恐惧症量表（SPS）和社会交往焦虑量表（SIAS）的因子结构。
BMC Psychiatry. 2023 Sep 4;23(1):646. doi: 10.1186/s12888-023-05142-8.
8
Therapist-supported Internet cognitive behavioural therapy for anxiety disorders in adults.成人焦虑症的治疗师辅助互联网认知行为疗法。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Mar 5(3):CD011565. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011565.
9
Factorial structure, validity, and gender invariance of the UCLA-R loneliness scale in ecuadorian adolescents.厄瓜多尔青少年中加州大学洛杉矶分校孤独感量表的因子结构、效度及性别不变性
PLoS One. 2025 Aug 4;20(8):e0328163. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0328163. eCollection 2025.
10
Therapist-supported Internet cognitive behavioural therapy for anxiety disorders in adults.治疗师支持的针对成人焦虑症的互联网认知行为疗法。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Mar 12;3(3):CD011565. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011565.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
Vulnerabilities in social anxiety: Integrating intra- and interpersonal perspectives.社交焦虑的脆弱性：整合内部和人际视角。
Clin Psychol Rev. 2024 Apr;109:102415. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2024.102415. Epub 2024 Mar 11.
2
Factor structure of the Social Phobia Scale (SPS) and the Social Interaction Anxiety Scale (SIAS) in a clinical sample recruited from the community.从社区招募的临床样本中社会恐惧症量表（SPS）和社会交往焦虑量表（SIAS）的因子结构。
BMC Psychiatry. 2023 Sep 4;23(1):646. doi: 10.1186/s12888-023-05142-8.
3
Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling: Practical Guidelines and Tutorial With a Convenient Online Tool for Mplus.探索性结构方程建模：实用指南及使用Mplus便捷在线工具的教程
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Jan 7;12:795672. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.795672. eCollection 2021.
4
Psychometric properties of the social interaction anxiety scale and the social phobia scale in Hungarian adults and adolescents.匈牙利成年人和青少年社交互动焦虑量表与社交恐惧症量表的心理测量特性
BMC Psychiatry. 2021 Mar 26;21(1):171. doi: 10.1186/s12888-021-03174-6.
5
Psychometric Properties of the Short Forms of the Social Interaction Anxiety Scale and the Social Phobia Scale in a Chinese College Sample.社交互动焦虑量表和社交恐怖症量表简版在中国大学生样本中的心理测量特性
Front Psychol. 2020 Oct 21;11:2214. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02214. eCollection 2020.
6
Comparing Scores From Full Length, Short Form, and Adaptive Tests of the Social Interaction Anxiety and Social Phobia Scales.比较社交互动焦虑和社交恐惧症量表的全长、短版和自适应测试的分数。
Assessment. 2020 Apr;27(3):518-532. doi: 10.1177/1073191119832657. Epub 2019 Mar 15.
7
Social and academic functioning in adolescents with anxiety disorders: A systematic review.焦虑障碍青少年的社会和学业功能：系统评价。
J Affect Disord. 2018 Apr 1;230:108-117. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2018.01.008. Epub 2018 Jan 31.
8
The cross-national epidemiology of social anxiety disorder: Data from the World Mental Health Survey Initiative.社交焦虑障碍的跨国流行病学：来自世界心理健康调查倡议的数据。
BMC Med. 2017 Jul 31;15(1):143. doi: 10.1186/s12916-017-0889-2.
9
Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the Combined Social Phobia Scale and Social Interaction Anxiety Scale: Support for a Bifactor Model.社交恐惧症量表与社交互动焦虑量表合并版的验证性因素分析：对双因素模型的支持
Front Psychol. 2017 Feb 2;8:70. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00070. eCollection 2017.
10
A Review of Scales to Measure Social Anxiety Disorder in Clinical and Epidemiological Studies.临床和流行病学研究中用于测量社交焦虑障碍的量表综述
Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2016 Apr;18(4):38. doi: 10.1007/s11920-016-0677-2.

韩国社区样本中社交互动焦虑量表-6和社交恐惧症量表-6的双因素模型

Bifactor Modeling of the Social Interaction Anxiety Scale-6 and the Social Phobia Scale-6 in a Korean Community Sample.

作者信息

Lim Young-Jin

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Gachon University, 13120 Seongnam, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Alpha Psychiatry. 2025 Aug 28;26(4):46107. doi: 10.31083/AP46107. eCollection 2025 Aug.

DOI:10.31083/AP46107
PMID:40926817
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12416050/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Social Interaction Anxiety Scale-6 (SIAS-6) and Social Phobia Scale-6 (SPS-6) are self-reported measures of social anxiety. The aim of this study was to identify the best model for SIAS-6 and SPS-6 using the newly advanced method of exploratory structural equation modeling (ESEM).

METHODS

Both confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and ESEM were utilized to assess the factor structure of the SIAS-6 and SPS-6. Three hundred Korean adults ( = 150, aged: 39.28 ± 10.91 years) participated in an online survey and responded to the SIAS-6 and SPS-6 questionnaires.

RESULTS

The findings showed that the bifactor ESEM and bifactor CFA models were a better fit than the other models. General factors had high loading values and reliability coefficients, whereas specific factors had moderate loading values and reliability coefficients. Additionally, measurement invariance across sexes was established.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated that bifactor models provide a unified perspective on the varying viewpoints regarding the relationship between social interaction and social performance anxiety.

摘要

背景

社交互动焦虑量表 -6（SIAS -6）和社交恐惧症量表 -6（SPS -6）是社交焦虑的自我报告测量工具。本研究的目的是使用探索性结构方程建模（ESEM）这一最新先进方法，确定适用于 SIAS -6 和 SPS -6 的最佳模型。

方法

采用验证性因素分析（CFA）和 ESEM 来评估 SIAS -6 和 SPS -6 的因素结构。300 名韩国成年人（男性 = 150 名，年龄：39.28 ± 10.91 岁）参与了一项在线调查，并对 SIAS -6 和 SPS -6 问卷进行了回答。

结果

研究结果表明，双因素 ESEM 和双因素 CFA 模型比其他模型拟合度更好。一般因素具有较高的载荷值和信度系数，而特定因素具有中等的载荷值和信度系数。此外，还建立了跨性别的测量不变性。

结论

本研究表明，双因素模型为社交互动与社交表现焦虑之间关系的不同观点提供了统一的视角。