Chan Shih-Hsuan, Chiang Tsung-Lin, Lin Yu-Chin, Chen Chu, Hsu Li-Sun, Wang Hsuan-Yun, Wu Huey-June
Graduate Institute of Sport Coaching Science, Chinese Culture University, Taipei City, Taiwan (R.O.C.).
Department of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, Taiwan (R.O.C.).
J Sports Sci Med. 2025 Sep 1;24(3):555-564. doi: 10.52082/jssm.2025.555. eCollection 2025 Sep.
Resistance training plays a key role in enhancing muscular performance; however, the effects of different combinations of loading intensity and velocity loss (VL) thresholds on muscle oxygen saturation (SmO) dynamics during exercise remain insufficiently understood. This study aimed to investigate the influence of intensity (60% vs. 80% one-repetition maximum [1RM]) and VL (20% vs. 40%) on SmO responses during the back squat exercise. Eighteen resistance-trained males (age: 20.06 ± 1.63 years; height: 176.78 ± 6.45 cm; body mass: 70.26 ± 9.56 kg) performed four back squat protocols - 60%1RM-VL20% (60-20), 60%1RM-VL40% (60-40), 80%1RM-VL20% (80-20), and 80%1RM-VL40% (80-40) - using a repeated-measures, counterbalanced design. Each protocol comprised three sets with 5-minute inter-set rest periods. SmO of the vastus lateralis was continuously monitored to determine changes in its magnitude and slope during exercise and recovery phases. Results revealed no significant differences were observed in the magnitude of SmO decline across conditions, with values ranging from 47.28% to 57.67% across all sets ( > .05). The SmO decline slope was significantly steeper (more negative) in the 80-20 condition (-1.71 to -2.04 %·s) compared to both 60-20 (-0.80 to -1.13 %·s) and 60-40 (-0.53 to -1.00 %·s) across all sets ( < .001). No significant differences were observed in SmO recovery slope during rest (range: 0.36-0.61 %·s; > .05). The present study demonstrated that combining 60% 1RM with a 40% VL% threshold elicited the slowest SmO decline rate, potentially delaying fatigue onset and allowing greater repetition volume. Although both training intensity and velocity loss thresholds influenced muscle oxygenation dynamics, the rate of SmO desaturation was particularly sensitive to changes in VL% thresholds under the 80% 1RM. These findings underscore the importance of integrating training intensity, VL% magnitude, and oxygenation dynamics when designing individualized resistance training protocols.
抗阻训练在增强肌肉性能方面起着关键作用;然而,运动期间负荷强度和速度损失(VL)阈值的不同组合对肌肉氧饱和度(SmO)动态变化的影响仍未得到充分了解。本研究旨在探究强度(60%与80%的一次重复最大值[1RM])和VL(20%与40%)对深蹲运动期间SmO反应的影响。18名经过抗阻训练的男性(年龄:20.06±1.63岁;身高:176.78±6.45厘米;体重:70.26±9.56千克)采用重复测量、平衡设计进行了四项深蹲方案——60%1RM-VL20%(60-20)、60%1RM-VL40%(60-40)、80%1RM-VL20%(80-20)和80%1RM-VL40%(80-40)。每个方案包括三组,组间休息5分钟。持续监测股外侧肌的SmO,以确定运动和恢复阶段其幅度和斜率的变化。结果显示,各条件下SmO下降幅度无显著差异,所有组的值在47.28%至57.67%之间(P>.05)。与60-20(-0.80至-1.13%·秒)和60-40(-0.53至-1.00%·秒)相比,80-20条件下(-1.71至-2.04%·秒)所有组的SmO下降斜率显著更陡(更负)(P<.001)。休息期间SmO恢复斜率无显著差异(范围:0.36-至0.61%·秒;P>.05)。本研究表明,将60%1RM与40%VL阈值相结合会导致SmO下降速率最慢,可能延迟疲劳发作并允许更大的重复量。尽管训练强度和速度损失阈值都影响肌肉氧合动态,但在80%1RM条件下,SmO去饱和速率对VL%阈值的变化尤为敏感。这些发现强调了在设计个性化抗阻训练方案时整合训练强度、VL%幅度和氧合动态的重要性。