Cardellat-González Melania, González-Gómez Luis, Guzmán-Gómez Juan-David, Blanco-Heras Laura, Arana-Rodríguez Andrés, Rodríguez-Domínguez Álvaro-José
Department of Health and Sports, Pablo de Olavide University, 41009 Seville, Spain.
Department of Nursing and Physiotherapy, University of Cadiz, 11009 Cadiz, Spain.
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Sep 3;13(17):2209. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13172209.
: Therapeutic exercise (TE) is recommended as the first line of treatment for low back pain (LBP), but questions remain about the true efficacy of TE in the acute phase. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of isolated TE in reducing pain intensity and disability in patients with acute or subacute LBP. : A systematic review with meta-analysis was conducted following the PRISMA guidelines. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that analyzed therapeutic exercise alone in one of the intervention groups and assessed pain intensity and disability were included; both outcomes were considered primary in this review. The quality of evidence was assessed using the GRADE tool. : Five RCTs were included. Meta-analyses were performed in subgroups according to the comparators: usual care, education, manual therapy, and bed rest. Statistically significant differences in favor of TE were found only when compared to usual care (SMD = -0.23; 95% CI [-0.45, -0.01]; = 0.04). : TE, when prescribed as an isolated intervention, appears to be more effective than usual care in improving short-term disability outcomes in patients with acute LBP. However, the limited quality and number of available studies, together with the typically favorable natural course of acute LBP, suggest that these findings should be interpreted with caution. Current evidence supports the integration of exercise within a comprehensive, multimodal management plan that addresses the physical, psychological, and social dimensions of pain.
治疗性运动(TE)被推荐为腰痛(LBP)的一线治疗方法,但TE在急性期的真正疗效仍存在疑问。本研究旨在评估单独进行TE对减轻急性或亚急性LBP患者疼痛强度和残疾程度的有效性。
按照PRISMA指南进行了一项系统评价和荟萃分析。纳入在其中一个干预组单独分析治疗性运动并评估疼痛强度和残疾程度的随机对照试验(RCT);在本评价中,这两个结果均被视为主要结果。使用GRADE工具评估证据质量。
纳入了五项RCT。根据比较对象进行亚组荟萃分析:常规护理、教育、手法治疗和卧床休息。仅在与常规护理相比时发现有利于TE的统计学显著差异(标准化均数差=-0.23;95%置信区间[-0.45,-0.01];P=0.04)。
当作为单独干预措施开出处方时,TE在改善急性LBP患者短期残疾结局方面似乎比常规护理更有效。然而,现有研究的质量和数量有限,再加上急性LBP通常具有良好的自然病程,这表明这些发现应谨慎解读。目前的证据支持将运动纳入一个全面的多模式管理计划,该计划要解决疼痛的身体、心理和社会层面问题。