• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

索磷布韦-维帕他韦-利巴韦林方案对既往直接抗病毒药物治疗失败的慢性丙型肝炎患者再治疗的疗效:一项来自国家治疗中心的回顾性研究

Efficacy of Sofosbuvir-Velpatasvir-Ribavirin Regimen for Retreatment of Chronic Hepatitis C in Patients With Prior DAA Failure: A Retrospective Study From a National Treatment Center.

作者信息

Singh Sinku, Sengupta Sibangi, Kumar Deepak, Mukherjee Kousik, Hasan Abdulla M D, Sadhukhan Provash, Ahammed Sk Mahiuddin

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.

Department of Hepatology, Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.

出版信息

Int J Hepatol. 2025 Sep 4;2025:9918357. doi: 10.1155/ijh/9918357. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.1155/ijh/9918357
PMID:40948725
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12425630/
Abstract

Direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) are highly effective in treating HCV infection, but a small subset of patients may fail to achieve SVR12 and require further intervention. In resource-limited settings where second-line DAAs (such as SOF/VEL/VOX) may be unavailable, optimizing first-line treatments is essential. This study evaluated the efficacy (SVR12) of a retreatment regimen based on first-line DAAs (SOF/VEL) with ribavirin. This retrospective study screened all viremic patients who attended the apex treatment center (ATC) between January 2019 and December 2023 and received DAAs as per the National Viral Hepatitis Control Program (NVHCP) guidelines. Patients who failed to achieve SVR12 were subsequently retreated with the available first-line regimen (SOF/VEL plus ribavirin). A total of 1814 viremic patients attended the ATC. One thousand two hundred and sixty-two patients completed therapy. One thousand one hundred ninety-eight (94.9%) patients achieved SVR12, and 64 patients (5.1%) failed to achieve SVR12. Additionally, 41 patients with DAA failure were referred from the treatment center (TC) and model treatment center (MTC) for evaluation. After further exclusions, 36 patients were enrolled, and 30 of them were offered retreatment. The majority of patients were male (64.5%) with a median age of 45 years (IQR, 19-68). Five patients were cirrhotic, while the remainder was noncirrhotic. Baseline HCV RNA levels before the retreatment regimen were 87,882 IU/mL (IQR, 9870-484,902). Most patients (96.6%) had Genotype 3 HCV infection. Prior to retreatment, 27 patients had received a 12-week regimen of sofosbuvir and daclatasvir, while only three had been treated with the sofosbuvir-velpatasvir regimen. After retreatment with sofosbuvir, velpatasvir, and ribavirin, 22 patients (73%) achieved SVR12. None of the patients experienced any adverse event. First-line DAAs are highly effective to treat naïve patients. In the absence of second-line options, retreatment with first-line DAAs (SOF/VEL plus ribavirin) is a viable alternative.

摘要

直接作用抗病毒药物(DAAs)在治疗丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)感染方面非常有效,但一小部分患者可能无法实现治疗12周后持续病毒学应答(SVR12),需要进一步干预。在资源有限的环境中,二线DAAs(如索磷布韦/维帕他韦/伏西瑞韦)可能无法获得,因此优化一线治疗至关重要。本研究评估了基于一线DAAs(索磷布韦/维帕他韦)联合利巴韦林的再治疗方案的疗效(SVR12)。这项回顾性研究筛查了2019年1月至2023年12月期间在顶级治疗中心(ATC)就诊并按照国家病毒性肝炎控制项目(NVHCP)指南接受DAAs治疗的所有病毒血症患者。未实现SVR12的患者随后接受可用的一线方案(索磷布韦/维帕他韦加利巴韦林)再治疗。共有1814名病毒血症患者在ATC就诊。1262名患者完成了治疗。1198名(94.9%)患者实现了SVR12,64名(5.1%)患者未实现SVR12。此外,41名DAAs治疗失败的患者从治疗中心(TC)和示范治疗中心(MTC)转诊来进行评估。经过进一步排除,36名患者被纳入研究,其中30名患者接受了再治疗。大多数患者为男性(64.5%),中位年龄为45岁(四分位间距,19 - 68岁)。5名患者为肝硬化患者,其余为非肝硬化患者。再治疗方案前的基线HCV RNA水平为87,882 IU/mL(四分位间距,9870 - 484,902)。大多数患者(96.6%)感染的是3型HCV。再治疗前,27名患者接受了12周的索磷布韦和达卡他韦治疗方案,而只有3名患者接受过索磷布韦 - 维帕他韦治疗方案。在接受索磷布韦、维帕他韦和利巴韦林再治疗后,22名患者(73%)实现了SVR12。没有患者出现任何不良事件。一线DAAs对初治患者非常有效。在没有二线治疗方案的情况下,用一线DAAs(索磷布韦/维帕他韦加利巴韦林)进行再治疗是一种可行的选择。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2fc1/12425630/c0e3842f9775/IJH2025-9918357.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2fc1/12425630/c0e3842f9775/IJH2025-9918357.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2fc1/12425630/c0e3842f9775/IJH2025-9918357.001.jpg

相似文献

1
Efficacy of Sofosbuvir-Velpatasvir-Ribavirin Regimen for Retreatment of Chronic Hepatitis C in Patients With Prior DAA Failure: A Retrospective Study From a National Treatment Center.索磷布韦-维帕他韦-利巴韦林方案对既往直接抗病毒药物治疗失败的慢性丙型肝炎患者再治疗的疗效:一项来自国家治疗中心的回顾性研究
Int J Hepatol. 2025 Sep 4;2025:9918357. doi: 10.1155/ijh/9918357. eCollection 2025.
2
Real-World Treatment Efficacy and Safety Profile of Sofosbuvir- and Velpatasvir-Based HCV Treatment in South Korea: Multicenter Prospective Study.索磷布韦和维帕他韦治疗韩国丙型肝炎病毒的真实世界疗效及安全性:多中心前瞻性研究
Viruses. 2025 Jul 4;17(7):949. doi: 10.3390/v17070949.
3
Treatment Outcomes of Sofosbuvir/Velpatasvir/Voxilaprevir in Direct-Acting Antiviral-Experienced Hepatitis C Virus Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.直接作用抗病毒药物经治慢性丙型肝炎病毒感染者索磷布韦/维帕他韦/沃士韦治疗结局的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Viruses. 2023 Jun 30;15(7):1489. doi: 10.3390/v15071489.
4
Efficacy of Second Generation Direct-Acting Antiviral Agents for Treatment Naïve Hepatitis C Genotype 1: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.第二代直接作用抗病毒药物用于初治丙型肝炎基因1型的疗效:一项系统评价和网状Meta分析
PLoS One. 2015 Dec 31;10(12):e0145953. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0145953. eCollection 2015.
5
Direct-Acting Antiviral Treatment Failure and Retreatment Strategies Following Hepatitis C-Positive Solid Organ Transplantation in Hepatitis C-Negative Recipients: A Multicenter Case Series.丙型肝炎阴性受者中丙型肝炎阳性实体器官移植后直接抗病毒治疗失败及再治疗策略:一项多中心病例系列研究
Transpl Infect Dis. 2025 Mar 24;27(3):e70024. doi: 10.1111/tid.70024.
6
Efficacy and Safety of Velpatasvir Plus Sofosbuvir With or Without Ribavirin in Hepatitis C Patients With Decompensated Cirrhosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.维帕他韦联合索磷布韦加或不加利巴韦林治疗失代偿期肝硬化丙型肝炎患者的疗效和安全性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Viral Hepat. 2025 Oct;32(10):e70078. doi: 10.1111/jvh.70078.
7
Effectiveness of current and future regimens for treating genotype 3 hepatitis C virus infection: a large-scale systematic review.当前及未来治疗丙型肝炎病毒3型感染方案的有效性:一项大规模系统评价
BMC Infect Dis. 2017 Nov 16;17(1):722. doi: 10.1186/s12879-017-2820-z.
8
Daclatasvir and Sofosbuvir Versus Sofosbuvir and Ribavirin in Patients with Chronic Hepatitis C Coinfected with HIV: A Matching-adjusted Indirect Comparison.在合并感染HIV的慢性丙型肝炎患者中,达卡他韦与索磷布韦联合用药对比索磷布韦与利巴韦林联合用药:一项匹配调整间接比较研究
Clin Ther. 2016 Feb;38(2):404-12. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2015.12.017. Epub 2016 Feb 3.
9
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
10
Direct-acting antivirals for chronic hepatitis C.用于慢性丙型肝炎的直接作用抗病毒药物。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Sep 18;9(9):CD012143. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012143.pub3.

本文引用的文献

1
Hepatitis C Retreatment With First-Line Direct Acting Antiviral Drugs.使用一线直接作用抗病毒药物进行丙型肝炎再治疗
J Clin Exp Hepatol. 2023 Sep-Oct;13(5):736-741. doi: 10.1016/j.jceh.2023.03.007. Epub 2023 Mar 24.
2
Hepatitis C Guidance 2023 Update: AASLD-IDSA Recommendations for Testing, Managing, and Treating Hepatitis C Virus Infection.《2023年丙型肝炎指南更新:美国肝病研究学会-美国感染病学会关于丙型肝炎病毒感染检测、管理及治疗的建议》
Clin Infect Dis. 2023 May 25. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciad319.
3
Corrigendum to 'EASL recommendations on treatment of hepatitis C: Final update of the series [J Hepatol 73 (2020) 1170-1218].
《欧洲肝脏研究学会丙型肝炎治疗推荐:系列最终更新版》勘误 [《肝脏病学杂志》73卷(2020年)1170 - 1218页]
J Hepatol. 2023 Feb;78(2):452. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2022.10.006. Epub 2022 Dec 1.
4
Impact of non-invasive biomarkers on hepatology practice: Past, present and future.非侵入性生物标志物对肝脏病学实践的影响:过去、现在和未来。
J Hepatol. 2022 Jun;76(6):1362-1378. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2022.03.026.
5
Seroprevalence and burden of hepatitis C virus infection in WHO South-East Asia Region: A systematic review.世界卫生组织东南亚区域丙型肝炎病毒感染的血清流行率及负担:一项系统评价
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022 Jun;37(6):964-972. doi: 10.1111/jgh.15827. Epub 2022 Mar 18.
6
Real-world efficacy and safety of pangenotypic direct-acting antivirals against hepatitis C virus infection in Taiwan.台湾地区泛基因型直接作用抗病毒药物治疗丙型肝炎病毒感染的真实世界疗效和安全性。
Sci Rep. 2021 Jun 29;11(1):13543. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-93095-x.
7
Real-world re-treatment outcomes of direct-acting antiviral therapy failure in patients with chronic hepatitis C.直接作用抗病毒治疗失败的慢性丙型肝炎患者的真实世界再治疗结局。
J Med Virol. 2021 Aug;93(8):4982-4991. doi: 10.1002/jmv.26971. Epub 2021 Apr 13.
8
Progress towards elimination goals for viral hepatitis.迈向消除病毒性肝炎目标的进展。
Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020 Sep;17(9):533-542. doi: 10.1038/s41575-020-0332-6. Epub 2020 Jul 23.
9
Decentralized care with generic direct-acting antivirals in the management of chronic hepatitis C in a public health care setting.在公共医疗保健环境中,使用通用直接作用抗病毒药物进行去中心化护理,以管理慢性丙型肝炎。
J Hepatol. 2019 Dec;71(6):1076-1085. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2019.07.006. Epub 2019 Jul 17.
10
Sofosbuvir, Velpatasvir, and Voxilaprevir for Previously Treated HCV Infection.索磷布韦、维帕他韦和沃西拉韦治疗既往 HCV 感染。
N Engl J Med. 2017 Jun 1;376(22):2134-2146. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1613512.