• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

输尿管支架症状:比较米拉贝隆和坦索罗辛使用情况的系统评价和荟萃分析

Ureteral stent symptoms: A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing the use of mirabegron and tamsulosin.

作者信息

Madarshahian Daniel, Habeeb Abdulrasheed, Chandra-Segaran Nimeshan, Subramonian Kesavapilla, Patel Keval

机构信息

Department of Urology University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust Birmingham UK.

Department of General Surgery University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust Birmingham UK.

出版信息

BJUI Compass. 2025 Sep 11;6(9):e2485. doi: 10.1002/bco2.485. eCollection 2025 Sep.

DOI:10.1002/bco2.485
PMID:40949003
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12425636/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Ureteral stent insertion, crucial for managing ureteral obstructions, often results in stent-related symptoms (SRSs) adversely affecting patient quality of life. This meta-analysis compares the effectiveness of tamsulosin or mirabegron versus placebo in alleviating these symptoms.

METHODS

Following PRISMA guidelines, we systematically reviewed randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing mirabegron or tamsulosin to placebo in managing SRSs. Data sources included PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and CENTRAL, up to November 2023. The inclusion criteria focused on studies reporting on Ureteral Stent Symptom Questionnaire (USSQ), International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), quality of life (QoL) assessments, analgesic usage and adverse events. Meta-analysis employed a random-effects model, assessing heterogeneity and publication bias. For assessing the risk of bias in the included randomized trials, we employed the Cochrane Collaboration's tool. This protocol was registered at the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (registration number: CRD42024511842).

RESULTS

Sixteen RCTs with 1635 patients met the inclusion criteria. Tamsulosin significantly improved body pain (MD -1.80; 95% CI -3.53 to -0.07;  = 0.04), sexual function (MD -0.63; 95% CI -1.16 to -0.10;  = 0.02) and improved quality of life score (MD -2.36; 95% CI -3.56 to -1.17;  = 0.0001), while mirabegron was more effective in reducing urinary symptoms (MD -8.71; 95% CI -15.81 to -1.61;  = 0.02), enhancing general health (MD -2.58; 95% CI -3.78 to -1.37;  < 0.0001) and reducing analgesia use (MD -1.56; 95% CI -2.70 to -0.41;  = 0.008). Both medications significantly reduced total International Prostate Symptom Score (Tamsulosin MD -8.4; 95% CI -15.63 to -1.22;  = 0.02; Mirabegron MD -6.29; 95% CI -8.50 to -4.08;  < 0.00001) without a significant rise in adverse events (tamsulosin OR 1.90; 95% CI 0.40-9.18; mirabegron  = 0.42 and OR 0.93; 95% CI 0.30-2.88;  = 0.89).

CONCLUSIONS

Tamsulosin and mirabegron effectively manage SRSs, with distinct benefits in different symptom domains. This suggests a potential for complementary therapeutic strategies. Future high-quality RCTs are needed to explore their combined efficacy.

摘要

背景

输尿管支架置入术对于处理输尿管梗阻至关重要,但常常会导致与支架相关的症状(SRSs),对患者生活质量产生不利影响。本荟萃分析比较坦索罗辛或米拉贝隆与安慰剂在缓解这些症状方面的有效性。

方法

遵循PRISMA指南,我们系统回顾了比较米拉贝隆或坦索罗辛与安慰剂治疗SRSs的随机对照试验(RCTs)。数据来源包括截至2023年11月的PubMed、Embase、Web of Science和CENTRAL。纳入标准聚焦于报告输尿管支架症状问卷(USSQ)、国际前列腺症状评分(IPSS)、生活质量(QoL)评估、镇痛药物使用及不良事件的研究。荟萃分析采用随机效应模型,评估异质性和发表偏倚。为评估纳入的随机试验中的偏倚风险,我们采用了Cochrane协作组的工具。本方案已在国际前瞻性系统评价注册库注册(注册号:CRD42024511842)。

结果

16项RCTs(共1635例患者)符合纳入标准。坦索罗辛显著改善了身体疼痛(MD -1.80;95% CI -3.53至-0.07;P = 0.04)、性功能(MD -0.63;95% CI -1.16至-0.10;P = 0.02)并提高了生活质量评分(MD -2.36;95% CI -3.56至-1.17;P = 0.0001),而米拉贝隆在减轻尿路症状方面更有效(MD -8.71;95% CI -15.81至-1.61;P = 0.02),增强总体健康状况(MD -2.58;95% CI -3.78至-1.37;P < 0.0001)并减少镇痛药物使用(MD -1.56;95% CI -2.70至-0.41;P = 0.008)。两种药物均显著降低了国际前列腺症状总分(坦索罗辛MD -8.4;95% CI -15.63至-1.22;P = 0.02;米拉贝隆MD -6.29;95% CI -8.50至-4.08;P < 0.00001),且不良事件无显著增加(坦索罗辛OR 1.90;95% CI 0.40 - 9.18;米拉贝隆P = 0.42且OR 0.93;95% CI 0.30 - 2.88;P = 0.89)。

结论

坦索罗辛和米拉贝隆可有效管理SRSs,在不同症状领域有不同益处。这提示了互补治疗策略的可能性。未来需要高质量的RCTs来探索它们的联合疗效。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a6df/12425636/03816812239b/BCO2-6-e2485-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a6df/12425636/95cf2230602a/BCO2-6-e2485-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a6df/12425636/f4d09e0a895a/BCO2-6-e2485-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a6df/12425636/03816812239b/BCO2-6-e2485-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a6df/12425636/95cf2230602a/BCO2-6-e2485-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a6df/12425636/f4d09e0a895a/BCO2-6-e2485-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a6df/12425636/03816812239b/BCO2-6-e2485-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Ureteral stent symptoms: A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing the use of mirabegron and tamsulosin.输尿管支架症状:比较米拉贝隆和坦索罗辛使用情况的系统评价和荟萃分析
BJUI Compass. 2025 Sep 11;6(9):e2485. doi: 10.1002/bco2.485. eCollection 2025 Sep.
2
Comparative efficacy of solifenacin and tamsulosin in alleviating stent-related symptoms: A systematic review and meta-analysis.索利那新与坦索罗辛缓解支架相关症状的疗效比较:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
Narra J. 2025 Aug;5(2):e1683. doi: 10.52225/narra.v5i2.1683. Epub 2025 Apr 21.
3
Mirabegron for the Treatment of Ureteral Stent-related Symptoms: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.米拉贝隆治疗输尿管支架相关症状:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
Eur Urol Focus. 2022 Jul;8(4):1031-1041. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2021.10.002. Epub 2021 Oct 20.
4
Selective progesterone receptor modulators (SPRMs) for uterine fibroids.用于子宫肌瘤的选择性孕激素受体调节剂(SPRMs)
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Apr 26;4(4):CD010770. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010770.pub2.
5
The Beneficial Effects of Alpha-Blockers, Antimuscarinics, Beta 3-Agonist, and PDE5-Inhibitors for Ureteral Stent-Related Discomfort: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis from KSER Update Series.α受体阻滞剂、抗毒蕈碱药物、β3激动剂和磷酸二酯酶5抑制剂对输尿管支架相关不适的有益作用:KSER更新系列的系统评价和荟萃分析
Medicina (Kaunas). 2025 Jan 27;61(2):232. doi: 10.3390/medicina61020232.
6
The role of solifenacin, as monotherapy or combination with tamsulosin in ureteral stent-related symptoms: a systematic review and meta-analysis.索利那新单药或与坦索罗辛联合治疗输尿管支架相关症状的作用:系统评价和荟萃分析。
World J Urol. 2017 Nov;35(11):1669-1680. doi: 10.1007/s00345-017-2051-3. Epub 2017 May 26.
7
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
8
Minimally invasive treatments for lower urinary tract symptoms in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia: a network meta-analysis.男性良性前列腺增生症下尿路症状的微创治疗:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Jul 15;7(7):CD013656. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013656.pub2.
9
Pharmacotherapy for anxiety and comorbid alcohol use disorders.焦虑症合并酒精使用障碍的药物治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jan 20;1(1):CD007505. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007505.pub2.
10
Smartphone and tablet self management apps for asthma.用于哮喘的智能手机和平板电脑自我管理应用程序。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Nov 27;2013(11):CD010013. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010013.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparing efficacy and safety of mirabegron, tamsulosin, and solifenacin in ureteral stent-related symptoms: outcomes from a network meta-analysis.米拉贝隆、坦索罗辛和索利那新治疗输尿管支架相关症状的疗效和安全性比较:网状Meta分析结果
Transl Androl Urol. 2024 May 31;13(5):699-707. doi: 10.21037/tau-23-642. Epub 2024 May 16.
2
Tamsulosin Versus Mirabegron in Relieving Ureteric Stent-Related Symptoms: A Prospective, Double-Blinded, Randomized Controlled Trial.坦索罗辛与米拉贝隆缓解输尿管支架相关症状的比较:一项前瞻性、双盲、随机对照试验。
Cureus. 2023 Dec 14;15(12):e50502. doi: 10.7759/cureus.50502. eCollection 2023 Dec.
3
Mirabegron and antimuscarinics for treating ureteral stent-related symptoms: a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs.
米拉贝隆与抗毒蕈碱药物治疗输尿管支架相关症状:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
Front Pharmacol. 2023 Oct 18;14:1266636. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1266636. eCollection 2023.
4
Comparison of Mirabegron plus Tamsulosin and Tamsulosin Monotherapy for the Treatment of Ureteral Stent-Related Symptoms: A Prospective Randomized Study.米拉贝隆联合坦索罗辛与坦索罗辛单药治疗输尿管支架相关症状的比较:一项前瞻性随机研究。
Urol Int. 2022;106(12):1226-1232. doi: 10.1159/000526607. Epub 2022 Oct 14.
5
Mirabegron vs. solifenacin in control of endoscopically inserted ureteral stent-related symptoms.米拉贝隆与索利那新控制内镜下置入输尿管支架相关症状的比较。
World J Urol. 2022 Aug;40(8):2113-2119. doi: 10.1007/s00345-022-04068-2. Epub 2022 Jun 27.
6
Mirabegron for the Treatment of Ureteral Stent-related Symptoms: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.米拉贝隆治疗输尿管支架相关症状:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
Eur Urol Focus. 2022 Jul;8(4):1031-1041. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2021.10.002. Epub 2021 Oct 20.
7
Comparison of stent related symptoms in patients taking mirabegron, solifenacin, or tamsulosin: A double blinded randomized clinical trial.服用米拉贝隆、索利那新或坦索罗辛的患者支架相关症状比较:一项双盲随机临床试验。
Urologia. 2022 Nov;89(4):589-596. doi: 10.1177/03915603211048153. Epub 2021 Oct 1.
8
The efficacy and safety of mirabegron in treating ureteral stent-related symptoms: A systematic review and meta-analysis.米拉贝隆治疗输尿管支架相关症状的疗效和安全性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Low Urin Tract Symptoms. 2022 Jan;14(1):27-34. doi: 10.1111/luts.12405. Epub 2021 Aug 6.
9
The role of mirabegron in relieving double-J stent-related discomfort: a randomized controlled clinical trial.米拉贝隆在缓解双J管相关不适中的作用:一项随机对照临床试验。
Cent European J Urol. 2021;74(1):76-80. doi: 10.5173/ceju.2021.0273.R2. Epub 2021 Feb 12.
10
Does tamsulosin or mirabegron improve ureteral stent-related symptoms? A prospective placebo-controlled study.坦索罗辛或米拉贝隆能否改善输尿管支架相关症状?一项前瞻性安慰剂对照研究。
Low Urin Tract Symptoms. 2021 Jan;13(1):17-21. doi: 10.1111/luts.12320. Epub 2020 May 14.