Torres Luna Jessica D, Tomalieh Basel T, Rebellow Delvy, Kasagga Alousious, Kabir Areeba, Murugesan Karthika, Chavez Cavalie Paolo S
Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Universidad Tecnologica Centroamericana (UNITEC), Tegucigalpa, HND.
Radiology, Aintree University Hospital, Liverpool, GBR.
Cureus. 2025 Sep 11;17(9):e92058. doi: 10.7759/cureus.92058. eCollection 2025 Sep.
Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) remains the most common and heterogeneous type of non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Accurate diagnosis is crucial but intensive. AI has emerged in the field as a potential to support the digital pathology workflow. This study is a systematic review of the performance and clinical utility of AI applied to digital pathology and classification of DLBCL through articles published from 2020 to 2025. We followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines. A total of 734 records were screened, and 11 studies met the inclusion criteria. QUADAS-2 and risk-of-bias VISualization(robvis) were used to assess bias. Data extraction included AI model architecture, diagnostic tasks, validation methods, and performance metrics. Eleven studies met the inclusion criteria, employing architectures such as convolutional neural networks, multiple instance learning, Vision Transformers, EfficientNet, U-Net, and HoVer-Net. Diagnostic metrics were consistently high: accuracies ranged from 87% to 100%, sensitivities from 90% to 100%, specificities from 52% to 100%, and area under the curve values up to 0.999. Several models outperformed pathologists in speed and precision, particularly in biomarker quantification and MYC rearrangement prediction. Risk of bias was low in index tests and reference standards, but patient selection was frequently rated as of high concern. AI-driven digital pathology demonstrates strong classification and diagnostic potential for DLBCL, achieving high accuracy across diverse methods and datasets. However, selection bias, limited external validation, and lack of standardization remain barriers. Continued research with multicenter, prospective validation is needed before routine clinical integration. Further research and standardization are needed for broader clinical integration in the field of digital pathology.
弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤(DLBCL)仍然是最常见且异质性最高的非霍奇金淋巴瘤类型。准确诊断至关重要但难度较大。人工智能已在该领域崭露头角,有望支持数字病理学工作流程。本研究通过对2020年至2025年发表的文章进行系统综述,探讨人工智能应用于数字病理学及DLBCL分类的性能和临床效用。我们遵循了系统评价与Meta分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)2020指南。共筛选了734条记录,11项研究符合纳入标准。采用QUADAS - 2和偏倚风险可视化(robvis)来评估偏倚。数据提取包括人工智能模型架构、诊断任务、验证方法和性能指标。11项研究符合纳入标准,采用了卷积神经网络、多实例学习、视觉Transformer、EfficientNet、U - Net和HoVer - Net等架构。诊断指标一直很高:准确率在87%至100%之间,灵敏度在90%至100%之间,特异性在52%至100%之间,曲线下面积值高达至0.999。在速度和精度方面,有几种模型优于病理学家,特别是在生物标志物定量和MYC重排预测方面。索引测试和参考标准中的偏倚风险较低,但患者选择经常被评为高度关注问题。人工智能驱动的数字病理学对DLBCL显示出强大的分类和诊断潜力,在各种方法和数据集中都能实现高精度。然而,选择偏倚、有限的外部验证和缺乏标准化仍然是障碍。在常规临床应用之前,需要进行多中心、前瞻性验证的持续研究。数字病理学领域需要进一步的研究和标准化,以实现更广泛的临床应用。