Lim Rachel S, Menahem Samuel
Department of Medical Education, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Department of Paediatrics, School of Clinical Sciences, Monash University, Monash Health, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
Transl Pediatr. 2025 Aug 31;14(8):2001-2008. doi: 10.21037/tp-2025-301. Epub 2025 Aug 27.
Smartwatches are commonly used within the community, especially amongst its younger population. These devices have a wide range of capabilities, including measuring the heart rate, generating electrocardiographic traces, and issuing alerts when 'abnormal' activity is detected. This information has potential benefits but also potential risks if the health-related measurements lead to inappropriate clinical interventions. This study aimed to evaluate the current literature on the prevalence, perception and interpretation of smartwatches that document and record cardiac information as it impacts on children, adolescents and their parents.
We conducted a scoping review based on the principles of Arksey and O'Malley, which followed the scoping review checklist of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR).
The selection criteria yielded 29 papers. They reported that smartwatch usage in children ranged from 15% to 40%, depending on the country of residence. The number of children presenting with smartwatch-based heart concerns had increased, with many false positives and few true arrhythmia diagnoses. Although there was good accuracy of heart rate measurements, there were poor automated algorithms for heart rhythm classification for the paediatric population. In addition, a few studies reported paediatric smartwatch user anxiety arising from the information generated by the devices.
The wearing of smartwatches has increased in children and adolescents. While they are able to record heart rates and provide corresponding electrocardiographic tracings virtually continuously and non-invasively, misinterpretation of the data arising from poor algorithms have led to increased healthcare presentations, as well as child and/or parental concern. There remains a need for ongoing education to understand the variability of the heart rate, especially in children. Furthermore, better algorithms for the interpretation of the information gleaned are required for this relatively well young population, so as to allay the anxiety that may be experienced. The issues related to medicolegal liability, privacy and cybersecurity remain to be resolved.
智能手表在社区中广泛使用,尤其是在年轻人中。这些设备具有广泛的功能,包括测量心率、生成心电图轨迹以及在检测到“异常”活动时发出警报。如果与健康相关的测量导致不适当的临床干预,这些信息既有潜在益处,也有潜在风险。本研究旨在评估当前关于记录和存储心脏信息的智能手表在儿童、青少年及其父母中的流行程度、认知和解读的文献。
我们基于阿克西和奥马利的原则进行了一项范围综述,遵循系统评价和Meta分析扩展的范围综述首选报告项目清单(PRISMA-ScR)。
选择标准产生了29篇论文。他们报告说,儿童使用智能手表的比例在15%至40%之间,具体取决于居住国家。因智能手表引发心脏问题的儿童数量有所增加,其中许多是误报,真正诊断为心律失常的很少。虽然心率测量的准确性较高,但针对儿科人群的心律分类自动算法较差。此外,一些研究报告了儿科智能手表用户因设备生成的信息而产生焦虑。
儿童和青少年佩戴智能手表的情况有所增加。虽然它们能够几乎连续且无创地记录心率并提供相应的心电图描记,但算法不佳导致的数据误读增加了医疗就诊次数,以及儿童和/或家长的担忧。仍然需要持续开展教育,以了解心率的变异性,尤其是在儿童中。此外,对于这个相对年轻的人群,需要更好的算法来解读所收集的信息,以减轻可能出现的焦虑。与法医学责任、隐私和网络安全相关的问题仍有待解决。