• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社交网站与幸福感:仅仅是内容的问题吗?

Social Network Sites and Well-Being: Is it Only a Matter of Content?

作者信息

Masciantonio Alexandra, Résibois Maxime, Bouchat Pierre, Bourguignon David

机构信息

Maastricht University, NL.

CRéSaM (Centre de Référence en SantéMentale), BE.

出版信息

Int Rev Soc Psychol. 2023 May 5;36:6. doi: 10.5334/irsp.736. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.5334/irsp.736
PMID:40951803
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12372800/
Abstract

Are social network sites harmful to our well-being? Despite the topicality of this question, the literature is still inconsistent. Possible reasons include the over-use of cross-sectional designs, the centration on Facebook, and the omission of the different ways of using these platforms. Two preregistered experimental studies were therefore conducted to investigate the effects of passive and active usages of Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter on subjective well-being. For both the first (N = 244) and the second (N = 164) study, the results did not yield any significant effects of the type of social network sites and their passive-active usages on subjective well-being. In contrast, surfing content was associated with subjective well-being in Study 2: the more positive the content was, the more life satisfaction increased, and the more the negative affect decreased. Further investigation of this research question will be necessary in larger samples, including longitudinal studies that could provide greater ecological validity while testing the effects of social network sites in the long-term. These findings are therefore to be taken with caution; above all, they open new avenues of research to understand the relationship between social network sites and subjective well-being.

摘要

社交网站对我们的幸福有害吗?尽管这个问题很热门,但相关文献仍存在不一致的观点。可能的原因包括过度使用横断面设计、以脸书为中心以及忽略了使用这些平台的不同方式。因此,进行了两项预先注册的实验研究,以调查被动和主动使用脸书、照片墙和推特对主观幸福感的影响。对于第一项研究(N = 244)和第二项研究(N = 164),结果均未显示社交网站类型及其被动-主动使用方式对主观幸福感有任何显著影响。相比之下,在第二项研究中,浏览内容与主观幸福感相关:内容越积极,生活满意度提高得越多,负面影响减少得越多。在更大的样本中进一步研究这个问题是必要的,包括纵向研究,这类研究在长期测试社交网站的影响时可以提供更高的生态效度。因此,这些发现应谨慎看待;最重要的是,它们为理解社交网站与主观幸福感之间的关系开辟了新的研究途径。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0e15/12372800/325551de355a/irsp-36-736-g7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0e15/12372800/14b8770d9769/irsp-36-736-g1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0e15/12372800/36d9702fc7c3/irsp-36-736-g2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0e15/12372800/30c5608b3c4e/irsp-36-736-g3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0e15/12372800/ded08169ab15/irsp-36-736-g4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0e15/12372800/5982d6c5cdc0/irsp-36-736-g5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0e15/12372800/40e5d35ec1ae/irsp-36-736-g6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0e15/12372800/325551de355a/irsp-36-736-g7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0e15/12372800/14b8770d9769/irsp-36-736-g1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0e15/12372800/36d9702fc7c3/irsp-36-736-g2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0e15/12372800/30c5608b3c4e/irsp-36-736-g3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0e15/12372800/ded08169ab15/irsp-36-736-g4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0e15/12372800/5982d6c5cdc0/irsp-36-736-g5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0e15/12372800/40e5d35ec1ae/irsp-36-736-g6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0e15/12372800/325551de355a/irsp-36-736-g7.jpg

相似文献

1
Social Network Sites and Well-Being: Is it Only a Matter of Content?社交网站与幸福感:仅仅是内容的问题吗?
Int Rev Soc Psychol. 2023 May 5;36:6. doi: 10.5334/irsp.736. eCollection 2023.
2
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
3
"In a State of Flow": A Qualitative Examination of Autistic Adults' Phenomenological Experiences of Task Immersion.“心流状态”:对自闭症成年人任务沉浸现象学体验的质性研究
Autism Adulthood. 2024 Sep 16;6(3):362-373. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0032. eCollection 2024 Sep.
4
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
5
Post-pandemic planning for maternity care for local, regional, and national maternity systems across the four nations: a mixed-methods study.针对四个地区的地方、区域和国家孕产妇保健系统的疫情后规划:一项混合方法研究。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Sep;13(35):1-25. doi: 10.3310/HHTE6611.
6
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
7
Antidepressants for pain management in adults with chronic pain: a network meta-analysis.抗抑郁药治疗成人慢性疼痛的疼痛管理:一项网络荟萃分析。
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Oct;28(62):1-155. doi: 10.3310/MKRT2948.
8
The Black Book of Psychotropic Dosing and Monitoring.《精神药物剂量与监测黑皮书》
Psychopharmacol Bull. 2024 Jul 8;54(3):8-59.
9
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
10
A rapid mixed-methods evaluation of remote home monitoring models during the COVID-19 pandemic in England.英格兰 COVID-19 大流行期间远程家庭监护模式的快速混合方法评估。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2023 Jul;11(13):1-151. doi: 10.3310/FVQW4410.

本文引用的文献

1
Motivation Scale for Using Social Network Sites: Comparative Study between Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, Snapchat and LinkedIn.社交网站使用动机量表:脸书、照片墙、推特、阅后即焚和领英之间的比较研究
Psychol Belg. 2023 Apr 11;63(1):30-43. doi: 10.5334/pb.1161. eCollection 2023.
2
Windows of developmental sensitivity to social media.社交媒体发育敏感期的窗口。
Nat Commun. 2022 Mar 28;13(1):1649. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-29296-3.
3
Social media use and well-being: What we know and what we need to know.社交媒体使用与幸福感:我们已知和未知的。
Curr Opin Psychol. 2022 Jun;45:101294. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.12.006. Epub 2021 Dec 20.
4
Don't put all social network sites in one basket: Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, TikTok, and their relations with well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic.不要把所有的社交网站都放在一个篮子里:Facebook、Instagram、Twitter、TikTok 以及它们在 COVID-19 大流行期间与幸福感的关系。
PLoS One. 2021 Mar 11;16(3):e0248384. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248384. eCollection 2021.
5
A review of theories and models applied in studies of social media addiction and implications for future research.社交媒体成瘾研究中应用的理论与模型综述及对未来研究的启示
Addict Behav. 2021 Mar;114:106699. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2020.106699. Epub 2020 Oct 10.
6
Social Media and Well-Being: Pitfalls, Progress, and Next Steps.社交媒体与幸福感:陷阱、进展与下一步。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2021 Jan;25(1):55-66. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2020.10.005. Epub 2020 Nov 10.
7
The effect of social media on well-being differs from adolescent to adolescent.社交媒体对幸福感的影响因青少年而异。
Sci Rep. 2020 Jul 1;10(1):10763. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-67727-7.
8
Teenagers, screens and social media: a narrative review of reviews and key studies.青少年、屏幕和社交媒体:综述和关键研究的叙述性回顾。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2020 Apr;55(4):407-414. doi: 10.1007/s00127-019-01825-4. Epub 2020 Jan 10.
9
The association between adolescent well-being and digital technology use.青少年福祉与数字技术使用之间的关系。
Nat Hum Behav. 2019 Feb;3(2):173-182. doi: 10.1038/s41562-018-0506-1. Epub 2019 Jan 14.
10
Is social network site usage related to depression? A meta-analysis of Facebook-depression relations.使用社交网站与抑郁有关吗?对 Facebook 与抑郁关系的元分析
J Affect Disord. 2019 Apr 1;248:65-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2019.01.026. Epub 2019 Jan 27.