Nabipoorashrafi Seyed Ali, Seyedi Arsalan, Bahri Razman Arabzadeh, Yadegar Amirhossein, Shomal-Zadeh Mostafa, Mohammadi Fatemeh, Afshari Samira Amin, Firoozeh Negar, Noroozzadeh Navida, Khosravi Farbod, Asadian Sanaz, Chalian Hamid
Cardiothoracic Imaging Section, Department of Radiology, University of Washington, 1959 NE Pacific Street Room RR215F, Box 357115, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.
Endocrinology and Metabolism Research Center (EMRC), School of Medicine, Vali-Asr Hospital, P.O. Box 13145784, Tehran, Iran.
J Imaging Inform Med. 2025 Sep 15. doi: 10.1007/s10278-025-01645-w.
Several artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms have been designed for detection of pulmonary embolism (PE) using computed tomographic pulmonary angiography (CTPA). Due to the rapid development of this field and the lack of an updated meta-analysis, we aimed to systematically review the available literature about the accuracy of AI-based algorithms to diagnose PE via CTPA. We searched EMBASE, PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane for studies assessing the accuracy of AI-based algorithms. Studies that reported sensitivity and specificity were included. The R software was used for univariate meta-analysis and drawing summary receiver operating characteristic (sROC) curves based on bivariate analysis. To explore the source of heterogeneity, sub-group analysis was performed (PROSPERO: CRD42024543107). A total of 1722 articles were found, and after removing duplicated records, 1185 were screened. Twenty studies with 26 AI models/population met inclusion criteria, encompassing 11,950 participants. Univariate meta-analysis showed a pooled sensitivity of 91.5% (95% CI 85.5-95.2) and specificity of 84.3 (95% CI 74.9-90.6) for PE detection. Additionally, in the bivariate sROC, the pooled area under the curved (AUC) was 0.923 out of 1, indicating a very high accuracy of AI algorithms in the detection of PE. Also, subgroup meta-analysis showed geographical area as a potential source of heterogeneity where the I for sensitivity and specificity in the Asian article subgroup were 60% and 6.9%, respectively. Findings highlight the promising role of AI in accurately diagnosing PE while also emphasizing the need for further research to address regional variations and improve generalizability.
已经设计了几种人工智能(AI)算法,用于通过计算机断层扫描肺血管造影(CTPA)检测肺栓塞(PE)。由于该领域的快速发展以及缺乏最新的荟萃分析,我们旨在系统地回顾有关基于AI的算法通过CTPA诊断PE准确性的现有文献。我们在EMBASE、PubMed、科学网和考科蓝数据库中搜索评估基于AI的算法准确性的研究。纳入报告了敏感性和特异性的研究。使用R软件进行单变量荟萃分析,并基于双变量分析绘制汇总接受者操作特征(sROC)曲线。为了探索异质性的来源,进行了亚组分析(国际前瞻性系统评价注册库:CRD42024543107)。共找到1722篇文章,去除重复记录后,筛选出1185篇。20项研究中的26个AI模型/人群符合纳入标准,涵盖11950名参与者。单变量荟萃分析显示,检测PE的合并敏感性为91.5%(95%置信区间85.5-95.2),特异性为84.3(95%置信区间74.9-90.6)。此外,在双变量sROC中,汇总曲线下面积(AUC)为0.923(满分1分),表明AI算法在检测PE方面具有非常高的准确性。亚组荟萃分析还显示,地理区域是异质性的一个潜在来源,亚洲文章亚组中敏感性和特异性的I2分别为60%和6.9%。研究结果突出了AI在准确诊断PE方面的前景,同时也强调需要进一步研究以解决区域差异并提高普遍性。