• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

男性人格因素对家庭形成和解体过程的前瞻性影响:来自瑞典登记数据的证据。

The Prospective Power of Personality Factors for Family Formation and Dissolution Processes Among Males: Evidence from Swedish Register Data.

作者信息

Peters Steffen

机构信息

Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany.

Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.

出版信息

Eur J Popul. 2025 Sep 16;41(1):23. doi: 10.1007/s10680-025-09748-4.

DOI:10.1007/s10680-025-09748-4
PMID:40956469
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12440851/
Abstract

Personality has increasingly become relevant for family formation processes. However, the association between personality and family formation (dissolution) has been underexplored in demographic research. This study contributes to existing research by examining the prospective association between two personality factors [social maturity (SM), and emotional stability (ES)] and family formation and dissolution processes, i.e., (1) marital status, (2) fertility, and (3) partnership dissolution as both (a) divorce and (b) cohabitation dissolution, based on large Swedish register data. Poisson regression, Linear Probability, and Cox proportional hazard models were applied for different outcomes. Findings suggest that males with high scores on SM and ES measured at age of assignment to military service (17-20 years) are more likely to get married by age 39 and above. Regarding fertility, SM and ES show positive associations with offspring counts and negative associations with the probability of remaining childless by age 39 and above. Relationship dissolution is negatively linked with SM and ES, in particular among the lowest personality scores. Further analyses using sibling comparisons support these findings.

摘要

个性在家庭形成过程中越来越重要。然而,人口学研究对个性与家庭形成(解体)之间的关联探讨不足。本研究基于瑞典大型登记数据,通过考察两种个性因素[社会成熟度(SM)和情绪稳定性(ES)]与家庭形成和解体过程之间的前瞻性关联,即(1)婚姻状况、(2)生育情况以及(3)作为离婚和同居关系解体的伴侣关系解体,为现有研究做出了贡献。针对不同结果应用了泊松回归、线性概率和考克斯比例风险模型。研究结果表明,在应征入伍年龄(17 - 20岁)时SM和ES得分较高的男性在39岁及以上时结婚的可能性更大。关于生育情况,SM和ES与子女数量呈正相关,与39岁及以上无子女的概率呈负相关。关系解体与SM和ES呈负相关,尤其是在个性得分最低的人群中。使用兄弟姐妹比较的进一步分析支持了这些发现。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/940b/12440851/c50ab59a2be9/10680_2025_9748_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/940b/12440851/86e58f845508/10680_2025_9748_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/940b/12440851/c50ab59a2be9/10680_2025_9748_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/940b/12440851/86e58f845508/10680_2025_9748_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/940b/12440851/c50ab59a2be9/10680_2025_9748_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
The Prospective Power of Personality Factors for Family Formation and Dissolution Processes Among Males: Evidence from Swedish Register Data.男性人格因素对家庭形成和解体过程的前瞻性影响:来自瑞典登记数据的证据。
Eur J Popul. 2025 Sep 16;41(1):23. doi: 10.1007/s10680-025-09748-4.
2
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
3
Parent-training programmes for improving maternal psychosocial health.改善孕产妇心理社会健康的家长培训项目。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004(1):CD002020. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002020.pub2.
4
[Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data].[容量与健康结果:来自系统评价和意大利医院数据评估的证据]
Epidemiol Prev. 2013 Mar-Jun;37(2-3 Suppl 2):1-100.
5
Aspects of Genetic Diversity, Host Specificity and Public Health Significance of Single-Celled Intestinal Parasites Commonly Observed in Humans and Mostly Referred to as 'Non-Pathogenic'.人类常见且大多被称为“非致病性”的单细胞肠道寄生虫的遗传多样性、宿主特异性及公共卫生意义
APMIS. 2025 Sep;133(9):e70036. doi: 10.1111/apm.70036.
6
Post-pandemic planning for maternity care for local, regional, and national maternity systems across the four nations: a mixed-methods study.针对四个地区的地方、区域和国家孕产妇保健系统的疫情后规划:一项混合方法研究。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Sep;13(35):1-25. doi: 10.3310/HHTE6611.
7
Comparison of Two Modern Survival Prediction Tools, SORG-MLA and METSSS, in Patients With Symptomatic Long-bone Metastases Who Underwent Local Treatment With Surgery Followed by Radiotherapy and With Radiotherapy Alone.两种现代生存预测工具 SORG-MLA 和 METSSS 在接受手术联合放疗和单纯放疗治疗有症状长骨转移患者中的比较。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Dec 1;482(12):2193-2208. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003185. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
8
Investigation and analysis of mental health status of the older adult in western rural areas.西部农村地区老年人心理健康状况的调查与分析
Front Public Health. 2025 Jul 16;13:1612600. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1612600. eCollection 2025.
9
Maternal and neonatal outcomes of elective induction of labor.择期引产的母婴结局
Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2009 Mar(176):1-257.
10
Racial and ethnic disparities in fecundability: a North American preconception cohort study.生育力方面的种族和族裔差异:一项北美孕前队列研究。
Hum Reprod. 2025 Apr 17. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deaf067.

本文引用的文献

1
Sibling influence on family formation: A study of social interaction effects on fertility, marriage, and divorce.兄弟姐妹对家庭组建的影响:一项关于社会互动对生育、婚姻和离婚影响的研究。
Adv Life Course Res. 2021 Mar;47:100359. doi: 10.1016/j.alcr.2020.100359. Epub 2020 Jul 21.
2
The Swedish military conscription register: opportunities for its use in medical research.瑞典兵役登记册:在医学研究中的应用机会。
Eur J Epidemiol. 2022 Jul;37(7):767-777. doi: 10.1007/s10654-022-00887-0. Epub 2022 Jul 9.
3
How Does Birth Order and Number of Siblings Affect Fertility? A Within-Family Comparison Using Swedish Register Data.
出生顺序和兄弟姐妹数量如何影响生育能力?一项使用瑞典登记数据的家庭内部比较研究。
Eur J Popul. 2019 Apr 30;36(2):197-233. doi: 10.1007/s10680-019-09525-0. eCollection 2020 Apr.
4
RIASEC interests and the Big Five personality traits matter for life success-But do they already matter for educational track choices?职业兴趣 RIASEC 与大五人格特质对生活成功很重要——但它们对教育轨道的选择是否已经很重要?
J Pers. 2020 Oct;88(5):1007-1024. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12547. Epub 2020 Apr 4.
5
Late-adolescent risk factors for suicide and self-harm in middle-aged men: explorative prospective population-based study.中年男性自杀和自残的青春期后期风险因素:探索性前瞻性基于人群的研究。
Br J Psychiatry. 2020 Jul;217(1):370-376. doi: 10.1192/bjp.2019.243.
6
Education, Gender, and Cohort Fertility in the Nordic Countries.北欧国家的教育、性别与同期群生育率
Eur J Popul. 2018 Jun 19;35(3):563-586. doi: 10.1007/s10680-018-9492-2. eCollection 2019 Jul.
7
Cognitive ability and fertility among Swedish men born 1951-1967: evidence from military conscription registers.1951-1967 年出生的瑞典男性的认知能力与生育力:来自兵役登记册的证据。
Proc Biol Sci. 2019 May 15;286(1902):20190359. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2019.0359.
8
Who Delays Childbearing? The Associations Between Time to First Birth, Personality Traits and Education.谁推迟了生育?首次生育时间、人格特质与教育之间的关联
Eur J Popul. 2016 Sep 19;32(4):575-597. doi: 10.1007/s10680-016-9393-1. eCollection 2016 Oct.
9
Facets of conscientiousness and objective markers of health status.尽责性的各个方面和健康状况的客观标志物。
Psychol Health. 2018 Sep;33(9):1100-1115. doi: 10.1080/08870446.2018.1464165. Epub 2018 May 2.
10
Personality change among newlyweds: Patterns, predictors, and associations with marital satisfaction over time.新婚夫妇的个性变化:模式、预测因素以及与婚姻满意度随时间的关系。
Dev Psychol. 2018 Jun;54(6):1172-1185. doi: 10.1037/dev0000491. Epub 2017 Dec 18.