• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于估计按他汀类药物暴露分层的动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病(ASCVD)风险的PREVENT和PCE模型。

PREVENT and PCE Models for Estimating ASCVD Risk Stratified by Statin Exposure.

作者信息

Lee Ming-Sum, Onwuzurike James, Wu Yi-Lin, Palmer-Toy Darryl E, An Jaejin, Chen Wansu

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Kaiser Permanente Los Angeles Medical Center, Los Angeles, California.

Department of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena.

出版信息

JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Sep 2;8(9):e2532164. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.32164.

DOI:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.32164
PMID:40956580
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12441873/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

The Predicting Risk of Cardiovascular Disease Events (PREVENT) equations are an updated model developed to improve on the Pooled Cohort Equation (PCE) for estimating 10-year atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk. These equations facilitate patient-clinician discussions on initiating statin therapy and are used to estimate risk without treatment. However, statin exposure during follow-up was not fully accounted for in the development of these equations.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the performance of the PCE and PREVENT equations in estimating ASCVD, accounting for statin exposure during follow-up.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This retrospective cohort study included adults from an integrated health care system with 10-year follow-up data. Adults without diabetes or ASCVD were identified in 2013 and followed-up through December 31, 2023, with analyses performed in January 2025.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary outcome was incident ASCVD. Estimated risks from PCE and PREVENT equations were compared with observed risks, with discrimination assessed via C statistics. The performance of these equations was evaluated in patient populations stratified by statin exposure during follow-up.

RESULTS

Among 193 885 adults (median [IQR] age, 55 [48-63] years; 113 400 [58.5%] women), 6528 experienced an ASCVD event. The C statistic was 0.725 (95% CI, 0.719-0.731) for PCE and 0.723 (95% CI, 0.716-0.729) for PREVENT. In the overall population, regardless of statin exposure, the observed 10-year ASCVD risk was lower than estimated by PCE: 3.6% for individuals with estimated risk of 5% to less than 7.5%, 4.5% for those with estimated risk of 7.5% to less than 10%, and 8.0% for those with estimated risk of 10% or greater. The observed risk more closely aligned with the estimated risk from PREVENT: 5.2% for individuals with estimated risk of 5% to 7.5%, 8.1% for those with estimated risk 7.5% to less than 10%, and 11.6% for those with estimated risk of 10% or greater. In contrast, among patients not exposed to statin therapy during follow-up, PREVENT underestimated risk: observed risk was 8.2% for individuals with estimated risk of 5% to less than 7.5%, and 13.5% for those with estimated risk of 7.5% to less than 10%, while PCE-estimated risk more closely approximated the observed risk.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this retrospective cohort study, the PREVENT model underestimated risk in patients not treated with statins, whereas the PCE estimates more closely reflected what a patient's risk would be without statin therapy.

摘要

重要性

心血管疾病事件预测(PREVENT)方程是一个经过更新的模型,旨在改进汇总队列方程(PCE)以估计10年动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病(ASCVD)风险。这些方程有助于医患之间关于启动他汀类药物治疗的讨论,并用于估计未经治疗时的风险。然而,这些方程的开发过程中并未充分考虑随访期间他汀类药物的暴露情况。

目的

评估PCE和PREVENT方程在估计ASCVD方面的性能,并考虑随访期间他汀类药物的暴露情况。

设计、设置和参与者:这项回顾性队列研究纳入了来自综合医疗保健系统且有10年随访数据的成年人。2013年识别出无糖尿病或ASCVD的成年人,并随访至2023年12月31日,于2025年1月进行分析。

主要结局和测量指标

主要结局是发生ASCVD。将PCE和PREVENT方程估计的风险与观察到的风险进行比较,并通过C统计量评估区分度。在根据随访期间他汀类药物暴露情况分层的患者群体中评估这些方程的性能。

结果

在193885名成年人中(年龄中位数[四分位间距]为55[48 - 63]岁;113400名[58.5%]为女性),6528人发生了ASCVD事件。PCE的C统计量为0.725(95%置信区间,0.719 - 0.731),PREVENT的C统计量为0.723(95%置信区间,0.716 - 0.729)。在总体人群中,无论他汀类药物暴露情况如何,观察到的10年ASCVD风险均低于PCE估计值:估计风险为5%至低于7.5%的个体为3.6%,估计风险为7.5%至低于10%的个体为4.5%,估计风险为10%或更高的个体为8.0%。观察到的风险与PREVENT估计的风险更为接近:估计风险为5%至7.5%的个体为5.2%,估计风险为7.5%至低于10%的个体为8.1%,估计风险为10%或更高的个体为11.6%。相比之下,在随访期间未接受他汀类药物治疗的患者中,PREVENT低估了风险:估计风险为5%至低于7.5%的个体观察到的风险为8.2%,估计风险为7.5%至低于10%的个体为13.5%,而PCE估计的风险更接近观察到的风险。

结论和相关性

在这项回顾性队列研究中,PREVENT模型低估了未接受他汀类药物治疗患者的风险,而PCE估计值更能准确反映患者在未接受他汀类药物治疗时的风险。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/806c/12441873/dca7e5cce9a0/jamanetwopen-e2532164-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/806c/12441873/9010befcba82/jamanetwopen-e2532164-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/806c/12441873/e1022e6b4386/jamanetwopen-e2532164-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/806c/12441873/dca7e5cce9a0/jamanetwopen-e2532164-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/806c/12441873/9010befcba82/jamanetwopen-e2532164-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/806c/12441873/e1022e6b4386/jamanetwopen-e2532164-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/806c/12441873/dca7e5cce9a0/jamanetwopen-e2532164-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
PREVENT and PCE Models for Estimating ASCVD Risk Stratified by Statin Exposure.用于估计按他汀类药物暴露分层的动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病(ASCVD)风险的PREVENT和PCE模型。
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Sep 2;8(9):e2532164. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.32164.
2
Cardiovascular Disease Risk Estimates in the US CKD Population Using the PREVENT Equation.使用PREVENT方程对美国慢性肾脏病患者群体进行心血管疾病风险评估。
Am J Kidney Dis. 2025 Mar 5. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2025.01.012.
3
Assessment of unmet clinical needs and healthcare resource use among statin-treated patients with or at risk of developing atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease.
J Med Econ. 2025 Dec;28(1):1616-1625. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2025.2558314. Epub 2025 Sep 16.
4
Comparison of Two Modern Survival Prediction Tools, SORG-MLA and METSSS, in Patients With Symptomatic Long-bone Metastases Who Underwent Local Treatment With Surgery Followed by Radiotherapy and With Radiotherapy Alone.两种现代生存预测工具 SORG-MLA 和 METSSS 在接受手术联合放疗和单纯放疗治疗有症状长骨转移患者中的比较。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Dec 1;482(12):2193-2208. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003185. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
5
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
6
Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Risk Estimates Using the New Predicting Risk of Cardiovascular Disease Events Equations: Implications for Statin Use.使用新的心血管疾病事件风险预测方程评估动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病风险:对他汀类药物使用的影响
Curr Cardiol Rep. 2025 Jul 2;27(1):107. doi: 10.1007/s11886-025-02244-5.
7
Performance of the pooled cohort equations and D:A:D risk scores among individuals with HIV in a global cardiovascular disease prevention trial: a cohort study leveraging data from REPRIEVE.在一项全球心血管疾病预防试验中,对感染艾滋病毒个体应用汇总队列方程和D:A:D风险评分的情况:一项利用REPRIEVE研究数据的队列研究
Lancet HIV. 2025 Feb;12(2):e118-e129. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3018(24)00276-5. Epub 2025 Jan 17.
8
Post-pandemic planning for maternity care for local, regional, and national maternity systems across the four nations: a mixed-methods study.针对四个地区的地方、区域和国家孕产妇保健系统的疫情后规划:一项混合方法研究。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Sep;13(35):1-25. doi: 10.3310/HHTE6611.
9
Performance of the American Heart Association PREVENT Cardiovascular Risk Equations in Older Adults.美国心脏协会预防心血管风险方程在老年人中的表现。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2025 Jun;18(6):e011719. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.124.011719. Epub 2025 Apr 28.
10
Risk thresholds for soft versus hard cardiovascular disease outcome models for initiating statin therapy among Chinese adults: a cost-utility analysis.中国成年人中启动他汀类药物治疗的软性与硬性心血管疾病结局模型的风险阈值:一项成本效益分析。
BMC Med. 2025 Jul 1;23(1):353. doi: 10.1186/s12916-025-04222-8.

本文引用的文献

1
External Validation of the American Heart Association PREVENT Cardiovascular Disease Risk Equations.美国心脏协会预防心血管疾病风险方程的外部验证。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Oct 1;7(10):e2438311. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.38311.
2
Prediction Under Interventions: Evaluation of Counterfactual Performance Using Longitudinal Observational Data.干预下的预测:使用纵向观察数据评估反事实性能。
Epidemiology. 2024 May 1;35(3):329-339. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000001713. Epub 2024 Apr 18.
3
2024 Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics: A Report of US and Global Data From the American Heart Association.
2024 年心脏病与中风统计数据:美国心脏协会发布的美国和全球数据报告。
Circulation. 2024 Feb 20;149(8):e347-e913. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001209. Epub 2024 Jan 24.
4
Novel Prediction Equations for Absolute Risk Assessment of Total Cardiovascular Disease Incorporating Cardiovascular-Kidney-Metabolic Health: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.纳入心血管-肾脏-代谢健康因素的全心血管疾病绝对风险评估新预测方程:美国心脏协会科学声明
Circulation. 2023 Dec 12;148(24):1982-2004. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001191. Epub 2023 Nov 10.
5
Development and Validation of the American Heart Association's PREVENT Equations.美国心脏协会 PREVENT 方程的制定与验证。
Circulation. 2024 Feb 6;149(6):430-449. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.123.067626. Epub 2023 Nov 10.
6
Prediction of Cardiovascular Disease Risk Accounting for Future Initiation of Statin Treatment.考虑未来开始使用他汀类药物治疗的情况下预测心血管疾病风险。
Am J Epidemiol. 2021 Oct 1;190(10):2000-2014. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwab031.
7
A scoping review of causal methods enabling predictions under hypothetical interventions.一项关于能够在假设干预下进行预测的因果方法的范围综述。
Diagn Progn Res. 2021 Feb 4;5(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s41512-021-00092-9.
8
2018 AHA/ACC/AACVPR/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/ADA/AGS/APhA/ASPC/NLA/PCNA Guideline on the Management of Blood Cholesterol: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines.2018 年美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会/美国心血管血管造影和介入学会/美国预防、物理治疗和康复医师学会/美国糖尿病协会/美国老年学会/美国药学会/美国医师协会/美国生理学会/北美介入放射学会/美国国家脂质协会/美国临床内分泌医师协会胆固醇管理指南:美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会临床实践指南工作组的报告。
Circulation. 2019 Jun 18;139(25):e1082-e1143. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000625. Epub 2018 Nov 10.
9
Practical recommendations for reporting Fine-Gray model analyses for competing risk data.关于报告竞争风险数据的Fine-Gray模型分析的实用建议。
Stat Med. 2017 Nov 30;36(27):4391-4400. doi: 10.1002/sim.7501. Epub 2017 Sep 15.
10
Performance of the Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Pooled Cohort Risk Equations by Social Deprivation Status.社会剥夺状况对动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病队列风险方程的表现影响。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2017 Mar 17;6(3):e005676. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.005676.