Su Luyang, Yao Jingrun, Ai Xiaohang, Ren Yanan, Xu Ren, Wu Xiaoqian, Zhao Shixia, Liu Weilan, Song Liyun, Du Zeqing
Physical Examination Center, Hebei General Hospital, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Fourth Hospital of Shijiazhuang, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China.
Digit Health. 2025 Sep 15;11:20552076251379340. doi: 10.1177/20552076251379340. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
Numerous HPV vaccine-related videos are available on Kwai, Bilibili, and TikTok; however, their quality and professionalism vary considerably. This study evaluates the quality and reliability of HPV vaccine-related videos on these platforms to offer Chinese-speaking users a reference for informed vaccination decisions.
A keyword search for the top 100 relevant videos on "HPV vaccine" was performed on Kwai, Bilibili, and TikTok, yielding a total of 238 eligible videos. A comparative analysis was conducted on video characteristics, uploader profiles, content categories, uploader attitudes, and public responses. The Global Quality Score (GQS) and the modified DISCERN (mDISCERN) instrument were applied to assess video quality and reliability.
TikTok had the highest median number of likes (1744.5) and shares (1338), while Bilibili led in median comments (179.25) and favorites (527). Public support for the HPV vaccine was highest on Kwai (63.2%), whereas TikTok showed notable opposition (15.8%). Interestingly, only Bilibili lacked a neutral stance. The proportion of physician uploaders was highest on TikTok (61.8%), whereas Bilibili had the largest share of self-media contributors (66.3%). Among professional uploaders, 92.3% supported the HPV vaccine, and their videos received 55.4% public approval-significantly higher than the 34.6% for individual users ( = 0.021). Significant differences in mDISCERN scores were observed across all three platforms (all pairwise comparisons, < 0.001).
Videos uploaded by professionals tend to have higher engagement and greater informational reliability, making them more effective in promoting public support for vaccination. TikTok videos scored highest on both GQS and mDISCERN metrics and had the largest proportion of professional uploaders, indicating superior overall quality and reliability. These findings should be interpreted within the context of the mainland-Chinese short-video ecosystem and may not be generalizable to non-Chinese-speaking populations.
在快手、哔哩哔哩和抖音上有大量与HPV疫苗相关的视频;然而,它们的质量和专业性差异很大。本研究评估了这些平台上与HPV疫苗相关视频的质量和可靠性,为说中文的用户提供参考,以便他们做出明智的疫苗接种决策。
在快手、哔哩哔哩和抖音上对“HPV疫苗”相关的前100个视频进行关键词搜索,共获得238个符合条件的视频。对视频特征、上传者资料、内容类别、上传者态度和公众反应进行了比较分析。应用全球质量评分(GQS)和改良的DISCERN(mDISCERN)工具来评估视频质量和可靠性。
抖音的点赞中位数(1744.5)和分享数(1338)最高,而哔哩哔哩的评论中位数(179.25)和收藏数(527)领先。快手对HPV疫苗的公众支持率最高(63.2%),而抖音则有显著的反对率(15.8%)。有趣的是,只有哔哩哔哩没有中立立场。医生上传者的比例在抖音上最高(61.8%),而哔哩哔哩的自媒体贡献者比例最大(66.3%)。在专业上传者中,92.3%支持HPV疫苗,他们的视频获得了55.4%的公众认可,显著高于个人用户的34.6%(P = = 0.021)。在所有三个平台上,mDISCERN评分均存在显著差异(所有两两比较,P < < 0.001)。
专业人士上传的视频往往具有更高的参与度和更高的信息可靠性,使其在促进公众对疫苗接种的支持方面更有效。抖音视频在GQS和mDISCERN指标上得分最高,专业上传者比例最大,表明其整体质量和可靠性更高。这些发现应在中国大陆短视频生态系统的背景下进行解读,可能不适用于非说中文的人群。