Katz D H, Hamaoka T, Benacerraf B
J Exp Med. 1973 Jun 1;137(6):1405-18. doi: 10.1084/jem.137.6.1405.
Several experimental approaches, designed specifically to circumvent the possible contribution of a complicating "allogeneic effect," have been successfully used to answer the question of physiologic cooperative interactions between histoincompatible T and B lymphocytes in antibody responses to hapten-protein conjugates. This was accomplished for in vivo cell transfer studies by using an F(1) hybrid host as the recipient of irradiated, carrier-primed T lymphocytes from one parent and 2,4-dinitrophenyl (DNP)-primed B lymphocytes from the opposite strain. Under these conditions, very good T-B cell cooperative interactions were observed to occur between T and B lymphocyte populations derived from syngeneic donors, whereas no cooperative response was obtained when T cells were derived from one parental strain and B cells from the other. Corroborative experiments were performed in a totally in vitro system in which DNP-primed B cells developed good secondary anti-DNP antibody responses in vitro to soluble DNP-keyhole limpet hemocyanin (KLH) when cultured in the presence of irradiated KLH-primed T cells derived from syngenic donors but not from allogeneic donors. The failure of histoincompatible T and B lymphocytes to effect physiologic cooperative interactions has important implications for our understanding of how such interactions normally occur. The possibility that these results reflect the existence of a "block" of some sort to cell-cell interaction by virtue of the presence of a foreign major histocompatibility antigen on the surface of either cell has been definitively ruled out in the present studies. These observations demonstrate that the gene(s) that conditions the capability for physiologic T-B cell cooperation must be shared in common by the respective cell types, and suggest, furthermore, that this gene (or genes) belongs to the major histocompatibility system of the mouse. These findings, together with other relevant phenomena described previously, have led us to postulate that there exists on the B lymphocyte surface an "acceptor" molecule either for the putative active T cell product or for the T cell itself. The important genetic considerations and the possible sequence of events surrounding the actual T-B cell interaction implied by these postulates are discussed in detail.
为了规避复杂的“同种异体效应”可能产生的影响,人们专门设计了几种实验方法,这些方法已成功用于解答组织不相容的T淋巴细胞和B淋巴细胞在对半抗原 - 蛋白质偶联物的抗体应答中生理协同相互作用的问题。在体内细胞转移研究中,通过使用F(1)杂种宿主作为受体来实现这一点,该宿主接受来自一个亲本的经辐照的、用载体致敏的T淋巴细胞和来自另一品系的用2,4 - 二硝基苯基(DNP)致敏的B淋巴细胞。在这些条件下,观察到来自同基因供体的T淋巴细胞和B淋巴细胞群体之间发生了非常良好的T - B细胞协同相互作用,而当T细胞来自一个亲本品系且B细胞来自另一个亲本品系时,则未获得协同应答。在一个完全体外系统中进行了确证实验,在用辐照过的、用钥孔戚血蓝蛋白(KLH)致敏的来自同基因供体而非异基因供体的T细胞存在的情况下培养时,用DNP致敏的B细胞在体外对可溶性DNP - 钥孔戚血蓝蛋白(KLH)产生了良好的二次抗DNP抗体应答。组织不相容的T淋巴细胞和B淋巴细胞无法实现生理协同相互作用,这对于我们理解这种相互作用通常如何发生具有重要意义。在本研究中,已经明确排除了这些结果反映由于任一细胞表面存在外来主要组织相容性抗原而对细胞间相互作用存在某种“阻碍”的可能性。这些观察结果表明,调节生理性T - B细胞合作能力的基因必须由各自的细胞类型共同拥有,并且进一步表明该基因(或这些基因)属于小鼠的主要组织相容性系统。这些发现,连同先前描述的其他相关现象,使我们推测在B淋巴细胞表面存在一种“受体”分子,它要么针对假定的活性T细胞产物,要么针对T细胞本身。详细讨论了这些假设所隐含的重要遗传因素以及围绕实际T - B细胞相互作用的可能事件顺序。