McNicholas K, de Leval M, Stark J, Taylor J F, Macartney F J
Br Heart J. 1979 Feb;41(2):133-8. doi: 10.1136/hrt.41.2.133.
Results of primary closure of ventricular septal defects are compared with those of two-stage repair, with banding of the pulmonary artery followed by debanding and closure. Apart from the high incidence of unsatisfactory results after banding and a significant morbidity with the two-stage approach, the mortality for primary repair (2.4%) is considerably lower than that achieved with the staged repair (19.3%). Primary repair of ventricular septal defect is advocated for infants resistant to maximal medical treatment. A more flexible policy is adopted for patients with multiple ventricular septal defects and those with associated anomalies.
将室间隔缺损一期修补的结果与两阶段修复的结果进行比较,后者先对肺动脉进行束带,然后解除束带并进行闭合。除了束带后效果不理想的发生率高以及两阶段方法存在显著的发病率外,一期修补的死亡率(2.4%)远低于分期修复的死亡率(19.3%)。对于最大程度药物治疗无效的婴儿,提倡进行室间隔缺损一期修补。对于有多个室间隔缺损的患者以及伴有相关异常的患者,采取更灵活的策略。