Ege G N, Warbick A
Br J Radiol. 1979 Feb;52(614):124-9. doi: 10.1259/0007-1285-52-614-124.
In vitro comparison of 99Tc(m) antimony sulphide colloid and 99Tc(m) stannous phytate as well as in vivo studies in six rabbits and seven patients indicate disparity in the colloidal properties and localization of these two agents. The variability in lymphatic uptake and the relatively poor quality of scintigraphic images following interstitial injection of 99Tc(m) stannous phytate, when compared with 99Tc(m) antimony sulphide colloid, provide evidence of the unsuitability of this agent for lymphoscintigraphy. Maintenance of the diagnostic quality of the lymphoscintigraphic image and adherence to interpretive criteria already established therefore preclude the routine use of 99Tc(m) stannous phytate for interstitial lymphoscintigraphy.
99Tc（m）硫化锑胶体与99Tc（m）植酸亚锡的体外比较以及在六只兔子和七名患者身上进行的体内研究表明，这两种制剂的胶体性质和定位存在差异。与99Tc（m）硫化锑胶体相比，99Tc（m）植酸亚锡间质注射后淋巴摄取的变异性以及闪烁图像质量相对较差，这证明该制剂不适用于淋巴闪烁造影。因此，维持淋巴闪烁造影图像的诊断质量并遵循已确立的解释标准，排除了99Tc（m）植酸亚锡常规用于间质淋巴闪烁造影的可能性。
